@@ -268,30 +268,6 @@ define void @gather_qps(<8 x i64> %ind, <8 x float> %src,
ptr %base, ptr %stbuf)
ret void
}
-declare void @llvm.x86.avx512.gatherpf.qps.512(i8, <8 x i64>, ptr , i32, i32);
phoebewang wrote:
Surprise to see they were working without a
@@ -8,16 +8,12 @@ target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
define dso_local i32 @main() local_unnamed_addr #0 !dbg !7 {
entry:
tail call void @llvm.prefetch(ptr inttoptr (i64 291 to ptr), i32 0, i32 0,
i32 1), !dbg !9
- tail call void @llvm.x86.avx512.gatherpf.dpd.512(i8
erichkeane wrote:
> > Hmm... I'm not sure this meets our requirements for inclusion as an
> > attribute. The semantics of this are pretty opaque, no obvious significant
> > motivation/applicability in the base languages, etc. There doesn't seem to
> > be any reasonable use case that I can see.
@@ -92,3 +92,35 @@ extern __attribute__((address_space(0))) int
type_attr_test_2; // expec
void invalid_param_fn(__attribute__((address_space(1))) int i); //
expected-error {{parameter may not be qualified with an address space}}
typeof(invalid_param_fn) invalid_param
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92767
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2092,8 +2096,8 @@ class alignas(TypeAlignment) Type : public
ExtQualsTypeCommonBase {
LLVM_PREFERRED_TYPE(TypeBitfields)
unsigned : NumTypeBits;
-LLVM_PREFERRED_TYPE(bool)
-unsigned IsUnqual : 1; // If true: typeof_unqual, else: typeof
+LLVM_PREFERRED_
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
The changes generally LG, but there's a merge conflict preventing the PR from
going through precommit CI.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92767
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.or
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
I think this looks ok, I'd love it if @cor3ntin took another look, but I'm as
happy as before.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92527
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llv
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91720
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/alexey-bataev approved this pull request.
LG
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92808
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -182,17 +182,34 @@ class OMPLoopScope : public
CodeGenFunction::RunCleanupsScope {
}
return false;
});
- PreInits = cast_or_null(LD->getPreInits());
+ PreInits = LD->getPreInits();
} else if (const auto *Tile = dyn_cast(&S))
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
The original patch changed some of the ParsedStmtContext's in ParseOMP that
might need to be changed back? Looking back, I think the intent there was in
part to not specify OMP standalone directives, so that part should be reverted
as well perhaps?
AaronBallman wrote:
I'm less certain, but CC @jdoerfert @mikerice1969 for more opinions.
The original changes actually fixed a bug in OpenMP related to standalone
directives.
> Note, this seems to have fixed an issue with some OpenMP stand-alone
directives not being properly diagnosed as per:
@@ -1230,11 +1230,11 @@ namespace cwg598 { // cwg598: yes
int &t = h(N::i);
}
-namespace cwg599 { // cwg599: partial
+namespace cwg599 { // cwg599: 19
typedef int Fn();
struct S { operator void*(); };
struct T { operator Fn*(); };
- struct U { operator int*(); oper
@@ -1245,12 +1245,7 @@ namespace cwg599 { // cwg599: partial
// expected-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void'
type 'void *'}}
delete t;
// expected-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression of type 'T'}}
-// FIXME: This is valid, but is rejected
MitalAshok wrote:
I've also found and fixed a related bug where types were compared with `==` not
`hasSameType`, leading to two conversion operators appearing to be different
when they are the same and Clang not compiling valid code:
https://godbolt.org/z/nY7svGKn8
https://github.com/llvm/llv
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92814
>From 43e9f8fe5cdb19c0f57a00b352592e56e470ffe7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 20:18:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Change how the argument of a delete expression is
c
https://github.com/erichkeane closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92808
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92814
>From 43e9f8fe5cdb19c0f57a00b352592e56e470ffe7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 20:18:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Change how the argument of a delete expression is
c
https://github.com/tmatheson-arm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90612
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -182,17 +182,34 @@ class OMPLoopScope : public
CodeGenFunction::RunCleanupsScope {
}
return false;
});
- PreInits = cast_or_null(LD->getPreInits());
+ PreInits = LD->getPreInits();
} else if (const auto *Tile = dyn_cast(&S))
@@ -3013,6 +3013,62 @@ Sema::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(FunctionDecl *FDecl,
unsigned BuiltinID,
break;
}
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_selectvector: {
+if (checkArgCount(*this, TheCall, 3))
+ return ExprError();
+
+ExprResult LHS = TheCall->getArg(0);
+Ex
@@ -3013,6 +3013,62 @@ Sema::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(FunctionDecl *FDecl,
unsigned BuiltinID,
break;
}
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_selectvector: {
+if (checkArgCount(*this, TheCall, 3))
+ return ExprError();
+
+ExprResult LHS = TheCall->getArg(0);
+Ex
@@ -1176,6 +1176,12 @@ def ConvertVector : Builtin {
let Prototype = "void(...)";
}
+def SelectVector : Builtin {
+ let Spellings = ["__builtin_selectvector"];
+ let Attributes = [NoThrow, Const, CustomTypeChecking];
AaronBallman wrote:
Should this also b
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
Also, please be sure to add a release note about the new functionality.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91306
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91306
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1459,11 +1460,11 @@ static AccessResult CheckEffectiveAccess(Sema &S,
llvm_unreachable("invalid access result");
}
-static Sema::AccessResult CheckAccess(Sema &S, SourceLocation Loc,
- AccessTarget &Entity) {
+static SemaAccess::Acces
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-05-21T17:12:35+03:00
New Revision: 7c640d1d43d7a151100e92c678757e0ce897bcc2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7c640d1d43d7a151100e92c678757e0ce897bcc2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7c640d1d43d7a151100e92c678757e0ce897bcc2.
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92674
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92674
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1230,11 +1230,11 @@ namespace cwg598 { // cwg598: yes
int &t = h(N::i);
}
-namespace cwg599 { // cwg599: partial
+namespace cwg599 { // cwg599: 19
typedef int Fn();
struct S { operator void*(); };
struct T { operator Fn*(); };
- struct U { operator int*(); oper
mizvekov wrote:
@erichkeane this is kind of the same as
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92854, but for NTTP instead of
type-parameters.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92852
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -1245,12 +1245,7 @@ namespace cwg599 { // cwg599: partial
// expected-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression with pointer-to-'void'
type 'void *'}}
delete t;
// expected-error@-1 {{cannot delete expression of type 'T'}}
-// FIXME: This is valid, but is rejected
@@ -15097,14 +15125,75 @@ bool SemaOpenMP::checkTransformableLoopNest(
llvm_unreachable("Unhandled loop transformation");
if (!DependentPreInits)
return;
-llvm::append_range(OriginalInits.back(),
- cast(DependentPreI
@@ -9924,11 +9941,24 @@ checkOpenMPLoop(OpenMPDirectiveKind DKind, Expr
*CollapseLoopCountExpr,
Stmt *DependentPreInits = Transform->getPreInits();
if (!DependentPreInits)
return;
-for (Decl *C : cast(DependentPreInits)->getDec
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92814
>From 43e9f8fe5cdb19c0f57a00b352592e56e470ffe7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 20:18:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] Change how the argument of a delete expression is
c
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89804
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -407,6 +406,16 @@ void IncrementalParser::CleanUpPTU(PartialTranslationUnit
&PTU) {
}
}
}
+
+ // FIXME: We should de-allocate MostRecentTU
+ for (Decl *D : MostRecentTU->decls()) {
+auto *ND = dyn_cast(D);
+if (!ND)
+ continue;
+// Check if we
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM with a possible improvement in the code (take it or leave it, your call).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89804
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://l
AaronBallman wrote:
> What part of the "camelBack" is visible to the user of the API? (we're not
> talking about method names or class names here I believe)
Parameter names, which show up in tooltips in IDEs, etc.
But again, the important thing is to at least be self-consistent. e.g.,
```
C
@@ -1230,11 +1230,11 @@ namespace cwg598 { // cwg598: yes
int &t = h(N::i);
}
-namespace cwg599 { // cwg599: partial
+namespace cwg599 { // cwg599: 19
typedef int Fn();
struct S { operator void*(); };
struct T { operator Fn*(); };
- struct U { operator int*(); oper
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92767
>From f87cb4c754a477515746e2ac2f8906b93ccd1fe3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 15:58:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang] [C23] Fix typeof_unqual for qualified array types
P
AaronBallman wrote:
> > I have no idea whether that returns a `SourceLocation`, a `PresumedLoc`, a
> > `FullSourceLoc`, etc, so I don't think that is a use of `auto` I would want
> > to have to reason about as a reviewer. That said, if the only use of `loc`
> > is: `Diag(loc, diag::err_someth
AtariDreams wrote:
> Correct, apple-m1 does not have BTI, but BTI is required for v8.5. My mistake.
Not sure if you are involved in writing the optimization guide itself at Apple,
but the way the chip is described as having 8.5 minus BTI is a bit confusing
since that would technically make the
perry-ca wrote:
@MaskRay no worries. This brittle test issue was a reason I trying to keep the
default for zLinux unchanged by this.
I have posted a new commit that eliminates the cmake variable for z/OS.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89854
yronglin wrote:
> I think this looks ok, I'd love it if @cor3ntin took another look, but I'm as
> happy as before.
Thanks for your review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92527
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:/
https://github.com/sbc100 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92840
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
AdityaShantanu wrote:
bump.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66553
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MitalAshok edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78060
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
goldsteinn wrote:
LGTM. Wait on some additional approvals to push please.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90824
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MitalAshok edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78060
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -27,6 +27,80 @@ class MemInit {
C m = s;
};
+namespace std {
+typedef decltype(sizeof(int)) size_t;
+
+// libc++'s implementation
+template class initializer_list {
+ const _E *__begin_;
+ size_t __size_;
+
+ initializer_list(const _E *__b, size_t __s) : __begin_(__b)
Author: Steven Wu
Date: 2024-05-21T09:15:37-07:00
New Revision: 7c19058d2a8e05383988b92cf4004c4cd8a54951
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7c19058d2a8e05383988b92cf4004c4cd8a54951
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7c19058d2a8e05383988b92cf4004c4cd8a54951.diff
LOG
https://github.com/cachemeifyoucan closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92297
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Momchil Velikov
Date: 2024-05-21T17:16:11+01:00
New Revision: f52d29c9ab7d3c712d36c28d00adc95fe7d52805
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f52d29c9ab7d3c712d36c28d00adc95fe7d52805
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f52d29c9ab7d3c712d36c28d00adc95fe7d52805.dif
https://github.com/momchil-velikov closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92778
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78060
>From 6ed7cad5d4993603221c3d9a777463675d69643b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 18:03:15 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [SemaCXX] Implement CWG2351 `void{}`
---
clang/docs/Releas
MitalAshok wrote:
@zygoloid The commit message was a bit outdated, it now takes the void type
from `T` instead of the initializer list (this also preserves extra info like
if it came from a typedef)
I've also changed it to `CK_ToVoid`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78060
__
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
LGTM. I had thought I added you in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92820, but you're still listed as
"request". I saw your avatar and just assumed you were a reviewer. Also, I
guess I missed the clang test, when I was checking lo
@@ -407,6 +406,16 @@ void IncrementalParser::CleanUpPTU(PartialTranslationUnit
&PTU) {
}
}
}
+
+ // FIXME: We should de-allocate MostRecentTU
+ for (Decl *D : MostRecentTU->decls()) {
+auto *ND = dyn_cast(D);
+if (!ND)
+ continue;
+// Check if we
MaskRay wrote:
Oh, I didn't know #92820! Thanks. Landing...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92856
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2024-05-21T09:27:03-07:00
New Revision: 446f66d685c2470bc7744b1d1538c4728e838e43
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/446f66d685c2470bc7744b1d1538c4728e838e43
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/446f66d685c2470bc7744b1d1538c4728e838e43.diff
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92856
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/momchil-velikov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91965
>From b1b69ffcaf4525a66dde1ae7f1a022c85204a579 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Momchil Velikov
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 16:25:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][AArch64][SVE] Allow write to SVE vector ele
momchil-velikov wrote:
Rebased.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91965
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5028,3 +5050,376 @@ void AutoType::Profile(llvm::FoldingSetNodeID &ID,
const ASTContext &Context) {
Profile(ID, Context, getDeducedType(), getKeyword(), isDependentType(),
getTypeConstraintConcept(), getTypeConstraintArguments());
}
+
+FunctionEffect::Kind Func
@@ -5028,3 +5050,376 @@ void AutoType::Profile(llvm::FoldingSetNodeID &ID,
const ASTContext &Context) {
Profile(ID, Context, getDeducedType(), getKeyword(), isDependentType(),
getTypeConstraintConcept(), getTypeConstraintArguments());
}
+
+FunctionEffect::Kind Func
@@ -7963,6 +7967,148 @@ static Attr *getCCTypeAttr(ASTContext &Ctx, ParsedAttr
&Attr) {
llvm_unreachable("unexpected attribute kind!");
}
+ExprResult Sema::ActOnEffectExpression(Expr *CondExpr, FunctionEffectMode
&Mode,
+ bool RequireC
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
Generally looks good, but it seems that some parts of this PR are also
incorporated into another PR, so it's a bit hard to review.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89811
___
cfe-commits mailing list
@@ -42,6 +42,9 @@
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include "llvm/TargetParser/Host.h"
+
+#include
AaronBallman wrote:
`` instead?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89811
__
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89811
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -7963,6 +7967,148 @@ static Attr *getCCTypeAttr(ASTContext &Ctx, ParsedAttr
&Attr) {
llvm_unreachable("unexpected attribute kind!");
}
+ExprResult Sema::ActOnEffectExpression(Expr *CondExpr, FunctionEffectMode
&Mode,
+ bool RequireC
https://github.com/dougsonos edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -7963,6 +7967,148 @@ static Attr *getCCTypeAttr(ASTContext &Ctx, ParsedAttr
&Attr) {
llvm_unreachable("unexpected attribute kind!");
}
+ExprResult Sema::ActOnEffectExpression(Expr *CondExpr, FunctionEffectMode
&Mode,
+ bool RequireC
@@ -7963,6 +7967,148 @@ static Attr *getCCTypeAttr(ASTContext &Ctx, ParsedAttr
&Attr) {
llvm_unreachable("unexpected attribute kind!");
}
+ExprResult Sema::ActOnEffectExpression(Expr *CondExpr, FunctionEffectMode
&Mode,
+ bool RequireC
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
+; RUN: not llc -mtriple=x86_64 %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ERR
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64 -mattr=+egpr < %s | FileCheck %s
--check-prefix=EGPR
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
+; RUN: not llc -mtriple=x86_64 < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ERR
+; RUN: not llc -mtriple=x86_64 -mattr=+egpr < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
--check-prefix=ERR
+; RUN: llc -mtripl
keith wrote:
looks like the .bazelrc still has mentions of this
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92865
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
JDevlieghere wrote:
No objections in the context of LLDB. We don't use terminfo directly (although
I think editline does, but that isn't affected by this) and if we want the TUI
we depend on curses anyway.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92865
__
vgvassilev wrote:
The failures on windows are due to "out of heap" error. Let's land this to test
on the "real" bots.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89804
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bi
Author: Vassil Vassilev
Date: 2024-05-21T20:21:32+03:00
New Revision: 253c28fa829cee0104c2fc59ed1a958980b5138c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/253c28fa829cee0104c2fc59ed1a958980b5138c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/253c28fa829cee0104c2fc59ed1a958980b5138c.dif
https://github.com/vgvassilev closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89804
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vgvassilev updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89811
>From 4a73cd3c3daca1cb1856a8e175dc9cb531ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vassil Vassilev
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:33:00 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-repl] Lay the foundation of pretty printing for C.
-
https://github.com/MitalAshok edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78060
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MitalAshok edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90353
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90353
>From 73f6c4ee69399011a781a61283316efd491b3d28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 19:15:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [SemaCXX] Qualified functions can't decay into pointers
Fixes #
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90353
>From c6cd95926b0de2687f56a4966ebb5babd30ba33f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 19:15:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Qualified functions can't decay into pointers
Fixes #27
efriedma-quic wrote:
I think the underlying functionality is pretty clearly useful: identical code
folding gives significant codesize reductions. In fact, on Windows, the linker
does this kind of folding automatically by default (despite the fact that it
isn't standards-compliant). I imagine
https://github.com/vgvassilev updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89811
>From 3e922935bc551dd5c3f76dae22a94318d0abd210 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vassil Vassilev
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:33:00 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-repl] Lay the foundation of pretty printing for C.
-
@@ -42,6 +42,9 @@
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include "llvm/TargetParser/Host.h"
+
+#include
vgvassilev wrote:
Fixed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89811
_
vgvassilev wrote:
> Generally looks good, but it seems that some parts of this PR are also
> incorporated into another PR, so it's a bit hard to review.
Rebased, should be only the commit in question now, as the other one landed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89811
@@ -156,9 +156,9 @@ extern "C" void body(...) {}
// IR-EMPTY:
// IR-NEXT: [[FOR_INC]]:
// IR-NEXT:%[[TMP34:.+]] = load i32, ptr %[[DOTTILE_0_IV_I]], align 4
-// IR-NEXT:%[[INC:.+]] = add nsw i32 %[[TMP34]], 1
+// IR-NEXT:%[[INC:.+]] = add i32 %[[TMP34]], 1
@@ -9924,11 +9954,24 @@ checkOpenMPLoop(OpenMPDirectiveKind DKind, Expr
*CollapseLoopCountExpr,
Stmt *DependentPreInits = Transform->getPreInits();
if (!DependentPreInits)
return;
-for (Decl *C : cast(DependentPreInits)->getDec
@@ -15095,16 +15136,70 @@ bool SemaOpenMP::checkTransformableLoopNest(
DependentPreInits = Dir->getPreInits();
else
llvm_unreachable("Unhandled loop transformation");
-if (!DependentPreInits)
- return;
-llvm::append_range(Ori
https://github.com/NuriAmari updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92331
>From 66ddf609c0e77867ec48c17136fb80d1e482041d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nuri Amari
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:33:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Run ObjCContractPass in Distributed Thin-LTO Pipeline
Prior t
Author: Zaara Syeda
Date: 2024-05-21T14:00:24-04:00
New Revision: 194e7cc7aabe2ffb153ca66527ffb6b500fa4c50
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/194e7cc7aabe2ffb153ca66527ffb6b500fa4c50
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/194e7cc7aabe2ffb153ca66527ffb6b500fa4c50.diff
L
https://github.com/syzaara closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90619
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/TApplencourt created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92945
None
>From b42fda1b00f2f5ca8ae312cf0d372e04582c5e4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Applencourt
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 13:00:37 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fix Typo on cindex.py
---
clang/bindings/python
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-05-21T21:01:21+03:00
New Revision: e6b14b6f8bfeeea8d24c8dccb17053ba491d5879
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e6b14b6f8bfeeea8d24c8dccb17053ba491d5879
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e6b14b6f8bfeeea8d24c8dccb17053ba491d5879.
101 - 200 of 407 matches
Mail list logo
