@@ -1028,6 +1029,14 @@
PassBuilder::buildModuleSimplificationPipeline(OptimizationLevel Level,
Phase != ThinOrFullLTOPhase::ThinLTOPostLink)
MPM.addPass(SampleProfileProbePass(TM));
+ // Instrument function entry and exit before all inlining.
+ if (Phase != ThinOr
Author: Serge Pavlov
Date: 2024-05-15T23:12:57+07:00
New Revision: 9bbefb7f600019c9d7025281132dd160729bfff2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9bbefb7f600019c9d7025281132dd160729bfff2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9bbefb7f600019c9d7025281132dd160729bfff2.diff
https://github.com/spavloff closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92146
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91082
>From 7e36c4d9f736b9b2eff29e565d22e01c29744c1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fangrui Song
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 13:10:21 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20initia?=
=?UTF-
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91082
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/saiislam created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92290
Legacy toolchain to handle multiple target architectures specified
using `-Xopenmp-target= -march=` was only
processing a single architecture. This patch also fixes the use of
comma to specify multiple archs for
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu
Author: Saiyedul Islam (saiislam)
Changes
Legacy toolchain to handle multiple target architectures specified
using `-Xopenmp-target= -march=` was only
processing a single architecture. This patch also fixes the use of
comma t
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Saiyedul Islam (saiislam)
Changes
Legacy toolchain to handle multiple target architectures specified
using `-Xopenmp-target= -march=` was only
processing a single architecture. This patch also fixes the use of
comma to specify
https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
This is interesting.. I like it in that its a "Leave" ... but part of me would
like this choice of default behind an option. As with the previous changes in
this area I'm uncomfortable about us changing how it behaves, but would like
saiislam wrote:
It will fix tests like:
[targetid_multi_image](https://github.com/ROCm/aomp/tree/aomp-dev/test/smoke/targetid_multi_image)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92290
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://
https://github.com/mydeveloperday commented:
Nice
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91930
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 9bbefb7f600019c9d7025281132dd160729bfff2
a6611634d03d102a8b69df8ff20d324efd81ae48 --
https://github.com/azat created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92291
In case of this is frame of signal handler, the IP should be incremented,
because the IP saved in the signal handler points to first non-executed
instruction, while FDE/CIE expects IP to be after the first non-execu
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2024-05-15T09:18:39-07:00
New Revision: 03c53c69a367008da689f0d2940e2197eb4a955c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/03c53c69a367008da689f0d2940e2197eb4a955c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/03c53c69a367008da689f0d2940e2197eb4a955c.diff
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91082
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libunwind
Author: Azat Khuzhin (azat)
Changes
In case of this is frame of signal handler, the IP should be incremented,
because the IP saved in the signal handler points to first non-executed
instruction, while FDE/CIE expects IP to be after the first
jhuber6 wrote:
I don't think we want to support this. `-march` was the wrong option to use in
the first place, and upstream LLVM never supported specifying multiple device
images with `-march` so there isn't a legacy argument in trunk. However, AOMP
did support this and if it's deemed too disr
ZequanWu wrote:
Can we revert this change while you are investigating if this fix is not
trivial?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87933
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/c
kparzysz wrote:
It's still used:
```
/work/kparzysz/git/llvm.org/mlir/lib/Target/LLVM/ROCDL/Target.cpp: In member
function ‘std::optional >
mlir::ROCDL::SerializeGPUModuleBase::assembleIsa(llvm::StringRef)’:
/work/kparzysz/git/llvm.org/mlir/lib/Target/LLVM/ROCDL/Target.cpp:302:15: error:
‘clas
arsenm wrote:
> It's still used:
>
> ```
> /work/kparzysz/git/llvm.org/mlir/lib/Target/LLVM/ROCDL/Target.cpp: In member
> function ‘std::optional >
> mlir::ROCDL::SerializeGPUModuleBase::assembleIsa(llvm::StringRef)’:
> /work/kparzysz/git/llvm.org/mlir/lib/Target/LLVM/ROCDL/Target.cpp:302:15:
kparzysz wrote:
> But why? I don't know what business MLIR could possibly have touching this,
> for AMDGPU of all things
I don't know why, but my build is failing now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91082
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-c
https://github.com/weiguozhi commented:
Looks good to me.
Please wait for AArch64 maintainer's approval.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91046
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
@@ -3768,6 +3768,12 @@ def err_conflicting_attributes_arm_state : Error<
"conflicting attributes for state '%0'">;
def err_sme_streaming_cannot_be_multiversioned : Error<
"streaming function cannot be multi-versioned">;
+def err_sme_streaming_mode_change_no_sve : Error<
+
@@ -8287,6 +8289,13 @@ AArch64TargetLowering::LowerCall(CallLoweringInfo &CLI,
SDValue InGlue;
if (RequiresSMChange) {
+
+if (Subtarget->hasSVE()) {
efriedma-quic wrote:
I'm not sure I follow what the issue is... I think we discussed before that we
w
kparzysz wrote:
Problem solved in 29c2475f215110d9e6b3955d5eb2832b3f719c2f.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91082
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/topperc approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92167
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: John Ericson
Date: 2024-05-15T12:43:55-04:00
New Revision: be10746f3a4381456eb5082a968766201c17ab5d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/be10746f3a4381456eb5082a968766201c17ab5d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/be10746f3a4381456eb5082a968766201c17ab5d.diff
https://github.com/Ericson2314 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92183
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
JOE1994 wrote:
> Do we know why GCC elected to go that route? This seems like something that
> should be enabled by default because the false positive rate should be quite
> low.
It seems like `gcc` doesn't enable `-Wparentheses` by default, while `clang`
enables it by default.
I will add a
@@ -2477,6 +2493,15 @@ void LoopAccessInfo::analyzeLoop(AAResults *AA, LoopInfo
*LI,
// Save 'store' instructions. Abort if other instructions write to
memory.
if (I.mayWriteToMemory()) {
+// We can safety handle math functions that have vectorized
+
https://github.com/cdai2 commented:
LGTM. Compilation is verified.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91950
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Ericson2314 wrote:
/cherry-pick be10746
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92183
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SunilKuravinakop updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92055
>From 6946c9f1285d5a27eafcdbf13f79c0641736198d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sunil Kuravinakop
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 12:09:15 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Avoiding DeclRefExpr with "non_odr_use_unevaluate
@@ -6088,6 +6088,9 @@ RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitBuiltinExpr(const GlobalDecl
GD, unsigned BuiltinID,
StringRef Prefix =
llvm::Triple::getArchTypePrefix(getTarget().getTriple().getArch());
if (!Prefix.empty()) {
+if (Prefix == "spv" &&
+getTarget().getTr
llvmbot wrote:
>/cherry-pick be10746
Error: Command failed due to missing milestone.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92183
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Ericson2314 milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92183
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Ericson2314 wrote:
/cherry-pick be10746
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92183
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
Realistically, I don't think we can deprecate the extension in general:
https://sourcegraph.com/search?q=context:global+%5BA-Za-z0-9_%5D%2B%5Cs%5BA-Za-z0-9_%5D%2B%5C%5B0%5C%5D%3B+-file:.*test.*+-file:.*clang.*+count:10&patternType=re
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86652
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5143,6 +5143,10 @@ static bool EvaluateUnaryTypeTrait(Sema &Self, TypeTrait
UTT,
case UTT_IsFloatingPoint:
return T->isFloatingType();
case UTT_IsArray:
+// zero-sized arrays aren't considered arrays in partial specializations,
+// so __is_array shouldn't c
@@ -5143,6 +5143,10 @@ static bool EvaluateUnaryTypeTrait(Sema &Self, TypeTrait
UTT,
case UTT_IsFloatingPoint:
return T->isFloatingType();
case UTT_IsArray:
+// zero-sized arrays aren't considered arrays in partial specializations,
AaronBallman wro
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#92293
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92183
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -14878,6 +14878,11 @@ ExprResult Sema::CreateBuiltinBinOp(SourceLocation
OpLoc,
case BO_GT:
ConvertHalfVec = true;
ResultTy = CheckCompareOperands(LHS, RHS, OpLoc, Opc);
+
+if (const auto *BI = dyn_cast(LHSExpr))
+ if (BI->isComparisonOp())
+Diag(
@@ -215,3 +215,10 @@ namespace PR20735 {
// fix-it:"{{.*}}":{[[@LINE-9]]:20-[[@LINE-9]]:20}:")"
}
}
+
+void consecutive_builtin_compare(int x, int y, int z) {
+ (void)(x < y < z); // expected-warning {{comparisons like 'X<=Y<=Z' don't
have their mathematical meaning}}
https://github.com/JOE1994 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92200
>From 2c7f9a083c129df70a79d019286b6a29643a8973 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Youngsuk Kim
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 17:42:59 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][Sema] Warn consecutive builtin comparisons in an
expr
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff c5cd049566a795ba5de88dfbb2eb563cad4a9d8a
b3cc457efc40a345d4b67c776edd470e35f73de2 --
https://github.com/lamb-j created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92294
None
>From cbeb6bcbd4442af709823af75ca82a2d33be9482 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacob Lambert
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 10:12:45 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [NFC][amdgpuarch] Correct file names in file header comments
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Jacob Lambert (lamb-j)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92294.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/tools/amdgpu-arch/AMDGPUArchByHIP.cpp (+1-1)
- (modified) clang/tools/amdgpu-arch/AMDGPUArchByHSA.
https://github.com/yxsamliu approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92294
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92295
This patch allows attributes to be attached to C++20 concepts, implementing
[CWG2428](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2428.html).
>From a0d5a234431f3db2f0283ffa0909bf8c254aa611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Fr
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll)
Changes
This patch allows attributes to be attached to C++20 concepts, implementing
[CWG2428](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2428.html).
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92295.d
https://github.com/teresajohnson approved this pull request.
compiler-rt changes lgtm
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91857
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92295
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
Please be sure to add a release note about implementing the DR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92295
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
@@ -10698,7 +10698,7 @@ C++ defect report implementation
status
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/1815.html";>1815
CD4
Lifetime extension in aggregate initialization
-Clang 19
+Yes
AaronBallman wrote:
Unrelated changes snuck in.
http
@@ -45,6 +45,34 @@ void fallthrough(int n) {
#endif
}
+namespace cwg2428 { // cwg2428: 19
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+template
+concept C [[deprecated]] = true; // #C
AaronBallman wrote:
I'd like an additional test for rejecting:
```
template
[[deprecated]
@@ -10698,7 +10698,7 @@ C++ defect report implementation
status
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/1815.html";>1815
CD4
Lifetime extension in aggregate initialization
-Clang 19
+Yes
Endilll wrote:
This particular one is an unfortunate
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92295
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MitalAshok created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92299
Fixes #92284
>From 98d773a3a0a2faa407fddb20a63db7bf01890a98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 18:50:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] [Sema] Fix some assertions not looking thr
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90786
>From e6fb7a3374ada3d02b4c89263ffd14a037a7e56a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 13:56:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [BoundsSafety] Allow 'counted_by' attribute on pointers in
structs i
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Mital Ashok (MitalAshok)
Changes
Fixes #92284
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92299.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp (+1-1)
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp (+1-1)
- (
https://github.com/MitalAshok edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92299
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92299
>From b6cb1c53a20637255bf869617b60155bfb636c60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 18:50:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Fix some assertions not looking through type sugar
Fixe
@@ -1,13 +1,15 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm -triple arm64-- -o - %s -O0 | FileCheck %s
--check-prefix=CHECK-O0
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-optzns -triple arm64-- -o - %s -O3
| FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-O3
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated
saiislam wrote:
> I don't think we want to support this. `-march` was the wrong option to use
> in the first place, and upstream LLVM never supported specifying multiple
> device images with `-march` so there isn't a legacy argument in trunk.
> However, AOMP did support this and if it's deemed
jhuber6 wrote:
> > I don't think we want to support this. `-march` was the wrong option to use
> > in the first place, and upstream LLVM never supported specifying multiple
> > device images with `-march` so there isn't a legacy argument in trunk.
> > However, AOMP did support this and if it's
https://github.com/mizvekov approved this pull request.
LGTM, Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92299
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/JOE1994 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92200
>From 2c7f9a083c129df70a79d019286b6a29643a8973 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Youngsuk Kim
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 17:42:59 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][Sema] Warn consecutive builtin comparisons in an
expr
https://github.com/JOE1994 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92200
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/JOE1994 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92200
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
saiislam wrote:
> > > I don't think we want to support this. `-march` was the wrong option to
> > > use in the first place, and upstream LLVM never supported specifying
> > > multiple device images with `-march` so there isn't a legacy argument in
> > > trunk. However, AOMP did support this an
jhuber6 wrote:
> If `-march` is the wrong option then let's start deprecating it and remove it
> altogether in the next llvm release. But, as long as it is here, it should be
> equivalent to `--offload-arch`.
Honestly not a bad idea. I could make a patch warning users to use
`--offload-arch`
https://github.com/fanbo-meng updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91384
>From 6428b9603044031aa5c58b2d75a0e9310bc3af6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fanbo Meng
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 13:36:38 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [SystemZ][z/OS] Implement z/OS XPLINK ABI
The XPLINK calling
@@ -529,9 +530,401 @@ bool SystemZTargetCodeGenInfo::isVectorTypeBased(const
Type *Ty,
return false;
}
+//===--===//
+// z/OS XPLINK ABI Implementation
+//===
saiislam wrote:
> > If `-march` is the wrong option then let's start deprecating it and remove
> > it altogether in the next llvm release. But, as long as it is here, it
> > should be equivalent to `--offload-arch`.
>
> Honestly not a bad idea. I could make a patch warning users to use
> `--o
jhuber6 wrote:
> > > If `-march` is the wrong option then let's start deprecating it and
> > > remove it altogether in the next llvm release. But, as long as it is
> > > here, it should be equivalent to `--offload-arch`.
> >
> >
> > Honestly not a bad idea. I could make a patch warning users
@@ -290,13 +295,13 @@ widenKeyToValueMap(const llvm::MapVector
&CurMap,
namespace {
// Visitor that builds a map from record prvalues to result objects.
-// This traverses the body of the function to be analyzed; for each result
-// object that it encounters, it propagates th
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+//===-- llvm/GEPNoWrapFlags.h - NoWrap flags for GEPs ---*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/aeubanks edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90824
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/aeubanks approved this pull request.
thanks, I think abstracting out GEPNoWrapFlags is good
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90824
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailma
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+//===-- llvm/GEPNoWrapFlags.h - NoWrap flags for GEPs ---*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
joanahalili wrote:
Hello @ mizvekov
We are seeing a widespread breakage due to this commit and could use having the
flag `-fno-relaxed-template-template-args` un-deprecated for a while. This
would help do a cleanup on our end.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807
_
shiltian wrote:
> > > > If `-march` is the wrong option then let's start deprecating it and
> > > > remove it altogether in the next llvm release. But, as long as it is
> > > > here, it should be equivalent to `--offload-arch`.
> > >
> > >
> > > Honestly not a bad idea. I could make a patch w
@@ -403,4 +405,35 @@ TEST_F(EnvironmentTest,
Contains(Member));
}
+TEST_F(EnvironmentTest, Stmt) {
+ using namespace ast_matchers;
+
+ std::string Code = R"cc(
+ struct S {int i;};
+ void foo() {
+S AnS = S{1};
+ }
martin
@@ -10698,7 +10698,7 @@ C++ defect report implementation
status
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/1815.html";>1815
CD4
Lifetime extension in aggregate initialization
-Clang 19
+Yes
AaronBallman wrote:
It's usually better to apply the
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92294
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cachemeifyoucan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92297
>From dcdad613db40ce325c1ffbe98df02c454daa3771 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steven Wu
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 10:35:55 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-05-15T23:12:02+04:00
New Revision: d542eb7aa830e94490b943a3ea0937506fece15b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d542eb7aa830e94490b943a3ea0937506fece15b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d542eb7aa830e94490b943a3ea0937506fece15b.
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92113
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
I think this is a reasonable compromise.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92214
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
https://github.com/5chmidti edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89553
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
5chmidti wrote:
Somehow I couldn't link that issue the normal way through the `Development`
entry on the side, so I eddited in a `Fixed` message into the initial comment.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89553
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe
@@ -403,4 +405,35 @@ TEST_F(EnvironmentTest,
Contains(Member));
}
+TEST_F(EnvironmentTest, Stmt) {
+ using namespace ast_matchers;
+
+ std::string Code = R"cc(
+ struct S {int i;};
+ void foo() {
+S AnS = S{1};
+ }
martin
@@ -146,6 +146,30 @@ TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisTest,
DiagnoseFunctionDiagnoserCalledOnEachElement) {
" (Lifetime ends)\n")));
}
+TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisTest, CanAnalyzeStmt) {
+ std::string Code = R"cc(
+ struct S {int i;};
+ S getAn
https://github.com/martinboehme approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91616
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/fanbo-meng updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91384
>From 6428b9603044031aa5c58b2d75a0e9310bc3af6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fanbo Meng
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 13:36:38 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [SystemZ][z/OS] Implement z/OS XPLINK ABI
The XPLINK calling
@@ -1551,6 +1567,58 @@ bool
Preprocessor::isPPInSafeBufferOptOutRegion(SourceLocation &StartLoc) {
return InSafeBufferOptOutRegion;
}
+SmallVector
+Preprocessor::serializeSafeBufferOptOutMap() const {
+ assert(!InSafeBufferOptOutRegion &&
ziqingluo-90 wrot
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple s390x-ibm-zos \
+// RUN: -emit-llvm -no-enable-noundef-analysis -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple s390x-ibm-zos -target-feature +vector \
+// RUN: -emit-llvm -no-enable-noundef-analysis -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+// R
ziqingluo-90 wrote:
> I'm very happy that this is going somewhere! Everything makes sense to me but
> I also don't know a lot about this stuff.
>
> > During serialization, it only serializes regions of the current translation
> > unit. Regions from loaded files are not serialized.
>
> Hmm how
danakj wrote:
I am curious so I will ask: why did this take an approach of serializing the
output of the pragmas (the maps) instead of serializing the pragmas themselves
as AST nodes, so that the maps would be constructed in the same way as from
parsing the text directly? that's how other prag
201 - 300 of 445 matches
Mail list logo
