https://github.com/kito-cheng commented:
Don't forgot `llvm/docs/RISCVUsage.rst`, otherwise LGTM :P
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90818
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
cor3ntin wrote:
@zwuis Thanks for your contribution. Will you need me to merge that for you?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89713
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-com
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90625
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
lukel97 wrote:
Hi, this seems to uncover an unfortunate error in xalan-c
https://github.com/apache/xalan-c/blob/c326619da4813acfc845c2830d904a4860f9afe1/src/xalanc/XMLSupport/XalanOtherEncodingWriter.hpp#L323
which is present in one of the SPEC CPU 2017 benchmarks (and prevents SPEC CPU
2017 f
Author: Oleksandr T
Date: 2024-05-02T09:22:59+02:00
New Revision: cd132dcbeb0fc79fd657bd5e0a8e9244c3fb5da6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cd132dcbeb0fc79fd657bd5e0a8e9244c3fb5da6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cd132dcbeb0fc79fd657bd5e0a8e9244c3fb5da6.diff
L
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89850
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@a-tarasyuk Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into
the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested
by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a problem with
a bui
zwuis wrote:
> @zwuis Thanks for your contribution. Will you need me to merge that for you?
Yes. Thanks for your review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89713
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi
Endilll wrote:
> Sounds like should perhaps note that we are implementing our own resolution,
> until there's an update to the cwg issue that can be referred to?
Our tooling is not ready for describing own own resolutions, unfortunately.
Ideally if we have a
davemgreen wrote:
Hi - We've ran into a couple of places where this causes problems, one of them
in running Spec as above. Is it possible to turn off this error for older
codebases with a flag, turning it into a warning? It doesn't seem like a very
useful error if it applies to code that is ne
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm < %s
efriedma-quic wrote:
Can you integrate this test into some existing file that's testing something
similar?
Please leave the bug number in a comment: something like `//GH88917`.
Please use FileCheck CHECK line
@@ -5702,13 +5702,16 @@ CodeGenModule::getLLVMLinkageVarDefinition(const
VarDecl *VD) {
static void replaceUsesOfNonProtoConstant(llvm::Constant *old,
llvm::Function *newFn) {
// Fast path.
- if (old->use_empty()) return;
+ if (old
Author: David Spickett
Date: 2024-05-02T08:44:32+01:00
New Revision: 16096325a5ff66d26b7e3424e7fac029c3dd35ea
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/16096325a5ff66d26b7e3424e7fac029c3dd35ea
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/16096325a5ff66d26b7e3424e7fac029c3dd35ea.diff
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90734
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cHackz18 wrote:
Hello and good morning from the UK!
It looks as though this change caused a test failure on the following buildbot:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/216/builds/38446
Are you able to take a look see?
many thanks for yoru time,
Tom W
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90830
Add new check readability-mark-static to dectect variable and function can be
marked as static.
>From 7f42888a6c7ee2bdb21c8d84b36b0821d32ffcc7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Thu, 2 May 2
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Congcong Cai (HerrCai0907)
Changes
Add new check readability-mark-static to dectect variable and function can be
marked as static.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90830.diff
11 Files Affected:
- (modified
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90830
>From ec7ddff8aedaa9d42796b5f952ff7ca77465dfd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 15:44:45 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] new check readability-mark-static
Add new check r
https://github.com/lanza created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90831
None
>From e57548737a72c5308e23fb442774b9bd9eca0bfa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Lanza
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 07:55:36 +
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20initia?=
=?U
https://github.com/lanza converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90831
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Nathan Lanza (lanza)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90831.diff
12 Files Affected:
- (added) clang/include/clang/CIR/CIRGenerator.h (+28)
- (added) clang/include/clang/CIRFrontendAction/CIRGenAction.h
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff e3f42b02a4129947ca2dd820bfb63ffed83027b7
e57548737a72c5308e23fb442774b9bd9eca0bfa --
DavidSpickett wrote:
@wzssyqa thanks for working with us on this. Bare metal is always a wild card
but I think in the end we'll all have cleaner builds because of these changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89638
___
cfe-commits mailing l
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --filter "call.*(frexp|modf)" --version 4
mgabka wrote:
sincos (which also takes linear pointers) has tests inside
veclib-function-calls.ll, so I would sugges
https://github.com/ostannard created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90832
When using a hard-float ABI for a target without FP registers, it's not
possible to correctly generate code for functions with arguments which must be
passed in floating-point registers. This is diagnosed in C
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: None (ostannard)
Changes
When using a hard-float ABI for a target without FP registers, it's not
possible to correctly generate code for functions with arguments which must be
passed in floating-point registers. This is diagnose
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: None (ostannard)
Changes
When using a hard-float ABI for a target without FP registers, it's not
possible to correctly generate code for functions with arguments which must be
passed in floating-point registers. This is diagnosed
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 16bd10a38730fed27a3bf111076b8ef7a7e7b3ee
b562b354a7bb955c3c46cd79753fd3d2d72d48fe --
https://github.com/ostannard updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90832
>From b562b354a7bb955c3c46cd79753fd3d2d72d48fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Stannard
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:40:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AArch64] Diagnose more functions when FP not enabled
Wh
@@ -1480,11 +1480,11 @@ AArch64leTargetInfo::AArch64leTargetInfo(const
llvm::Triple &Triple,
void AArch64leTargetInfo::setDataLayout() {
if (getTriple().isOSBinFormatMachO()) {
if(getTriple().isArch32Bit())
- resetDataLayout("e-m:o-p:32:32-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S12
https://github.com/ckandeler updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83412
>From 349edc160e9c13068c42b35321814296bb713a09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christian Kandeler
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 12:26:52 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clangd] Remove potential prefix from enum value names
..
ckandeler wrote:
Underscore separators get removed now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83412
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/phoebewang closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88245
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PiotrZSL edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90830
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+//===--- MarkStaticCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - readability-mark-static
+
+readability-mark-static
+===
+
+Detects variable and function can be marked as static.
+
+Static functions and variables are scoped to a single file. Marking functions
+and variables as static
https://github.com/PiotrZSL requested changes to this pull request.
1. Wrong check name, maybe readability-unessesary-external-linkage or
something, maybe it should even be an performance check [as there it will bring
more benefits] (current check suggest more an "static methods").
2. Add suppo
HerrCai0907 wrote:
> Add support for unity builds (.cpp files included from single .cpp file =
> isInMainFile is not sufficient)
For unity build, it looks like a project level decision. Then they can ignore
this check. Maybe I can provide an option to treat some extension as main file
also.
Author: Krishna Narayanan
Date: 2024-05-02T10:42:34+01:00
New Revision: f17b1fb6673e9ed6a7d9180230586113bb99748c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f17b1fb6673e9ed6a7d9180230586113bb99748c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f17b1fb6673e9ed6a7d9180230586113bb99748c.d
https://github.com/RKSimon closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89362
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Sven van Haastregt
Date: 2024-05-02T11:43:56+02:00
New Revision: b6328db80b4294cf83a3471ecdfab33003fa742d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b6328db80b4294cf83a3471ecdfab33003fa742d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b6328db80b4294cf83a3471ecdfab33003fa742d.
https://github.com/svenvh closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90048
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1480,11 +1480,11 @@ AArch64leTargetInfo::AArch64leTargetInfo(const
llvm::Triple &Triple,
void AArch64leTargetInfo::setDataLayout() {
if (getTriple().isOSBinFormatMachO()) {
if(getTriple().isArch32Bit())
- resetDataLayout("e-m:o-p:32:32-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S12
https://github.com/karka228 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90377
>From 80836f51573c8ba474a0b5d5890a489d5f0c7034 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Karl-Johan Karlsson
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:04:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Pre-commit reproducer for fast-math flags on calls
Ad
https://github.com/martinboehme created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90842
# Observed erroneous behavior
Prior to this change, a `MemberExpr` that accesses an anonymous class might have
a prvalue as its base (even though C++ mandates that the base of a `MemberExpr`
must be a glvalu
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (martinboehme)
Changes
# Observed erroneous behavior
Prior to this change, a `MemberExpr` that accesses an anonymous class might have
a prvalue as its base (even though C++ mandates that the base of a `MemberExpr`
must be a glvalue),
https://github.com/fhahn approved this pull request.
LGTM, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90702
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
firewave wrote:
Isn't this already covered by `-Wmissing-prototypes`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90830
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/fhahn updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90702
>From 4c312af7af5d0e419269c5b2304b0f898363bb85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Doug Wyatt
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 21:43:16 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] In AArch64's DataLayout, specify a minimum function
alignment of 4
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - readability-mark-static
+
+readability-mark-static
+===
+
+Detects variable and function can be marked as static.
+
+Static functions and variables are scoped to a single file. Marking functions
+and variables as static
PiotrZSL wrote:
> Isn't this already covered by `-Wmissing-prototypes`?
No, because -Wmissing-prototypes will not provide warning, when both
declaration and definition is in .cpp
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90830
___
cfe-commits mailing
PiotrZSL wrote:
> Maybe I can provide an option to treat some extension as main file also.
Clang-tidy already got those options, check just need to utilize them.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90830
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits
https://github.com/martinboehme edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/martinboehme edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/martinboehme edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/5chmidti approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83412
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
martinboehme wrote:
@AaronBallman You're probably not the right person to review this yourself, but
I'm told you probably have an idea of who might be an appropriate reviewer?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90842
___
cfe-commits mailing lis
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - readability-mark-static
+
+readability-mark-static
+===
+
+Detects variable and function can be marked as static.
+
+Static functions and variables are scoped to a single file. Marking functions
+and variables as static
https://github.com/ckandeler closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83412
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ckandeler reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83412
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - readability-mark-static
+
+readability-mark-static
+===
+
+Detects variable and function can be marked as static.
+
+Static functions and variables are scoped to a single file. Marking functions
+and variables as static
komalverma04 wrote:
> Thanks for looking into this. Because this is touching a lot of checks, there
> was bound to be some conversation about which matchers need the
> `ignoringParenImpCasts` and which don't. I think we should check that now
> instead of later, so don't be alarmed about the nu
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - readability-mark-static
+
+readability-mark-static
+===
+
+Detects variable and function can be marked as static.
+
+Static functions and variables are scoped to a single file. Marking functions
+and variables as static
https://github.com/5chmidti updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90273
>From 9b5bf4e1d53b3a55f9290199aeccb02c20a1e2cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Schmidt
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 22:49:38 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-tidy] fix false-positives for templates in
`bugpron
Krishna-13-cyber wrote:
> LGTM
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89362
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bjope created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90845
Make sure that the result from the popcnt/ctlz/cttz intrinsics is unsigned
casted to int, rather than casted as a signed value, when expanding the
__builtin_popcountg/__builtin_ctzg/__builtin_clzg builtins.
An exa
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Björn Pettersson (bjope)
Changes
Make sure that the result from the popcnt/ctlz/cttz intrinsics is unsigned
casted to int, rather than casted as a signed value, when expanding the
__builtin_popcountg/__builtin_ctzg/__builtin_clzg builtins
@@ -3216,7 +3216,8 @@ RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitBuiltinExpr(const GlobalDecl
GD, unsigned BuiltinID,
case Builtin::BI__popcnt64:
case Builtin::BI__builtin_popcount:
case Builtin::BI__builtin_popcountl:
- case Builtin::BI__builtin_popcountll: {
+ case Builtin::BI__bui
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff d9fc5babb96ca9c75f36f9cf3d3f2a55ddc0ab4d
bab0da08c41ed13935ad607e633939b6870d4ffb --
sdkrystian wrote:
@davemgreen you can try using `-fdelayed-template-parsing` to fix the error. A
compatibility flag could be added for older code bases -- but I'd like guidance
from @erichkeane, @cor3ntin, and/or @AaronBallman on that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90152
__
Author: Weaver
Date: 2024-05-02T11:51:45+01:00
New Revision: 2252c5c42b95dd12dda0c7fb1b2811f943b21949
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2252c5c42b95dd12dda0c7fb1b2811f943b21949
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2252c5c42b95dd12dda0c7fb1b2811f943b21949.diff
LOG: R
TomWeaver18 wrote:
Reverted in 2252c5c42b95dd12dda0c7fb1b2811f943b21949
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90438
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tmatheson-arm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90320
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
alexey-bataev wrote:
A test?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90800
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/alexey-bataev edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90796
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/alexey-bataev edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90796
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -503,12 +512,211 @@ ExprResult SemaOpenACC::ActOnArraySectionExpr(Expr
*Base, SourceLocation LBLoc,
SourceLocation RBLoc) {
ASTContext &Context = getASTContext();
- // TODO OpenACC: We likely have to reproduce a lot of the s
https://github.com/alexey-bataev approved this pull request.
LG with a nit
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90796
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Christian Kandeler
Date: 2024-05-02T13:18:59+02:00
New Revision: f2daa32fcaa061daa04546c343198d876e635def
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f2daa32fcaa061daa04546c343198d876e635def
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f2daa32fcaa061daa04546c343198d876e635def.
https://github.com/ckandeler closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83412
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ckandeler wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69704
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-05-02T13:20:04+02:00
New Revision: 5d9889a6c6c97c92380c8eee48eaa35067f63766
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5d9889a6c6c97c92380c8eee48eaa35067f63766
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5d9889a6c6c97c92380c8eee48eaa35067f63766.diff
LO
ckandeler wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67802
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -O3 -emit-llvm -o - %s \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK %s
+
+// Reproducer for issue #87758
+// The testca
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-05-02T13:43:06+02:00
New Revision: e5fb6564358f10c01d7533f2f805eedd7d663417
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e5fb6564358f10c01d7533f2f805eedd7d663417
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e5fb6564358f10c01d7533f2f805eedd7d663417.diff
LO
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-05-02T13:43:06+02:00
New Revision: 3d8a44d542b15ac9bc21f9fd3494f1649fca1aa9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3d8a44d542b15ac9bc21f9fd3494f1649fca1aa9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3d8a44d542b15ac9bc21f9fd3494f1649fca1aa9.diff
LO
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-05-02T13:43:07+02:00
New Revision: de04e6cd90b891215f1dfc83ec886d037a7c2ed0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/de04e6cd90b891215f1dfc83ec886d037a7c2ed0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/de04e6cd90b891215f1dfc83ec886d037a7c2ed0.diff
LO
Pierre-vh wrote:
I changed it so it's one or more string arguments:
```
__builtin_amdgcn_masked_fence(__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST, "workgroup", "local", "global")
```
I'm now wondering if adding a new builtin is needed at all, or if it should
just be part of the original builtin? It's an additive change.
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-05-02T13:51:50+02:00
New Revision: 1c7673b91d4d3bab4e296f5c67751d3879fb21a2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1c7673b91d4d3bab4e296f5c67751d3879fb21a2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1c7673b91d4d3bab4e296f5c67751d3879fb21a2.diff
LO
@@ -275,6 +275,13 @@ Response HandleFunction(Sema &SemaRef, const FunctionDecl
*Function,
TemplateArgs->asArray(),
/*Final=*/false);
+if (RelativeToPrimary &&
+(Function->getTemplateSpeciali
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-05-02T14:01:09+02:00
New Revision: ebcb04ae8825b15fd6aa249a8da0617b877b4705
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ebcb04ae8825b15fd6aa249a8da0617b877b4705
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ebcb04ae8825b15fd6aa249a8da0617b877b4705.diff
LO
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-05-02T14:03:48+02:00
New Revision: 427c5bfd39ebb9d008b621370579444fbf2a60d7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/427c5bfd39ebb9d008b621370579444fbf2a60d7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/427c5bfd39ebb9d008b621370579444fbf2a60d7.diff
LO
https://github.com/jcsxky updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90646
>From 50aa5b64f6d2cf98706bfb4792f274bd071e3b9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qizhi Hu <836744...@qq.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 02:25:04 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][Sema] fix a bug on constraint check with t
@@ -275,6 +275,13 @@ Response HandleFunction(Sema &SemaRef, const FunctionDecl
*Function,
TemplateArgs->asArray(),
/*Final=*/false);
+if (RelativeToPrimary &&
+(Function->getTemplateSpeciali
https://github.com/sdkrystian edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88963
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jcsxky wrote:
> I agree with @sdkrystian, even though the test crashes for maybe yet another
> reason, it demonstrates you can friend a function from a different template
> context, so comparing the depths from different branches is not helpful.
@mizvekov I missed the case which friend functio
https://github.com/jthackray approved this pull request.
LGTM (presumably these were mechanically renamed, given the diff size).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90320
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.
https://github.com/Lukacma created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90849
Adding lifetime markers to pointers to temporary stack allocated objects,
allows compiler to make more efficient use of the stack. Currently these
markers are not added to indirectly called aggregate types so th
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (Lukacma)
Changes
Adding lifetime markers to pointers to temporary stack allocated objects,
allows compiler to make more efficient use of the stack. Currently these
markers are not added to indirectly called aggregate types so this p
Lukacma wrote:
As this pull request is using _BitInt datatype as motivating example, this PR
is dependent on #90741
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90849
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/
1 - 100 of 397 matches
Mail list logo
