https://github.com/wzssyqa closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89638
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jyu2-git unassigned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90800
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90717
>From 94c812abc4e528d3d3cb96fa3c3b7f78b6a87a91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 11:03:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][PGO] Apply artificial DebugLoc to
llvm.instrprof.in
https://github.com/sdkrystian edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90760
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
wjristow wrote:
Hi @spavloff.
Regarding:
> With that goal in mind, having `optnone` and `-O0` be deliberately different
> here makes no sense.
There's no need for them to behave differently here. And in fact, we _want_
them to behave the same. There's a subtle point about FP contraction, in
https://github.com/dougsonos updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90702
>From 4c312af7af5d0e419269c5b2304b0f898363bb85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Doug Wyatt
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 21:43:16 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] In AArch64's DataLayout, specify a minimum function
alignment
https://github.com/bharadwajy created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90809
An earlier commit provided a way to decouple DXIL version from Shader Model
version
by representing the DXIL version as `SubArch` in the DXIL Target Triple and
adding
corresponding valid DXIL Arch types.
Th
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-ir
@llvm/pr-subscribers-hlsl
Author: S. Bharadwaj Yadavalli (bharadwajy)
Changes
An earlier commit provided a way to decouple DXIL version from Shader Model
version
by representing the DXIL version as `SubArch` in the DXIL Target Triple and
adding
@@ -115,6 +115,30 @@ StringRef Triple::getArchName(ArchType Kind, SubArchType
SubArch) {
if (SubArch == AArch64SubArch_arm64e)
return "arm64e";
break;
+ case Triple::dxil:
+switch (SubArch) {
+case Triple::NoSubArch:
+case Triple::DXILSubArch_v1_0:
+
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -DWIN -verify -std=c++23 -fsyntax-only %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -std=c++23 -fsyntax-only %s
+
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+
+#ifdef WIN
+#define INFINITY ((float)(1e+300 * 1e+300))
+#define NAN (-(float)(INFINITY * 0.0F))
+#else
https://github.com/hubert-reinterpretcast edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
haoNoQ wrote:
@mikhailramalho long time no see!
I think @rniwa is right on this one. "Inline" is completely orthogonal to
"safe". Fundamentally it only matters what the function _actually does_; it
doesn't matter how it's defined or where or how the code is generated for it.
These checkers do
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90813
None
>From fb7b2eec7dcd065ff3edfa0f76efc012e8439a63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 10:36:11 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [NFC][clang-tidy] update check list document
---
clang-
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Congcong Cai (HerrCai0907)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90813.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst (+1-1)
``diff
diff --git a/clang-to
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Congcong Cai (HerrCai0907)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90813.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst (+1-1)
``diff
diff --git a/c
@@ -380,3 +387,20 @@ namespace PR51861 {
// CHECK-FIXES: {{^}}PR51861::Foo::getBar();{{$}}
}
}
+
+namespace PR75163 {
PiotrZSL wrote:
PR = Problem Report (in this context)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90736
_
Author: Congcong Cai
Date: 2024-05-02T10:41:39+08:00
New Revision: a370d57b9ff9e385e9a51bf6b1d366890f4091cd
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a370d57b9ff9e385e9a51bf6b1d366890f4091cd
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a370d57b9ff9e385e9a51bf6b1d366890f4091cd.diff
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90813
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Piotr Zegar
Date: 2024-05-02T04:42:42+02:00
New Revision: 889e60db2daf93c0bb3f7ae0db0a60bfefb86d89
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/889e60db2daf93c0bb3f7ae0db0a60bfefb86d89
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/889e60db2daf93c0bb3f7ae0db0a60bfefb86d89.diff
L
https://github.com/PiotrZSL closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90566
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Piotr Zegar
Date: 2024-05-02T04:43:35+02:00
New Revision: 1f1a417925624a67cb6cb2bbbdd901e0e90ee237
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1f1a417925624a67cb6cb2bbbdd901e0e90ee237
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1f1a417925624a67cb6cb2bbbdd901e0e90ee237.diff
L
https://github.com/PiotrZSL closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90560
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yetingk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89727
>From a43014cf3daa1b0fd9092bfe41da979205ba64aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yeting Kuo
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 02:16:04 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [RISCV] Teach .option arch to support experimental
extensions.
@@ -2824,8 +2826,12 @@ bool RISCVAsmParser::parseDirectiveOption() {
break;
}
- auto Ext = llvm::lower_bound(RISCVFeatureKV, Arch);
- if (Ext == std::end(RISCVFeatureKV) || StringRef(Ext->Key) != Arch ||
+ std::string Feature = RISCVISAInfo::getTar
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ STATISTIC(RISCVNumInstrsCompressed,
static cl::opt AddBuildAttributes("riscv-add-build-attributes",
cl::init(false));
-
yetingk wrote:
Done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89727
___
https://github.com/soukatch updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90012
>From 9007597af4f138d2744405bb7980fce4555d7508 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Sukach
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:50:50 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] MangledSymbol: remove pointless copy of vector
---
@@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ using namespace clang::targets;
TargetInfo *
TargetInfo::CreateTargetInfo(DiagnosticsEngine &Diags,
const std::shared_ptr &Opts) {
- llvm::Triple Triple(Opts->Triple);
+ llvm::Triple Triple(llvm::Triple::normalize(Opts->Triple)
https://github.com/topperc created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90818
None
>From ef8985a4bb9fe78c273d9d3cb2af17b0d65459c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Craig Topper
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 20:27:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [RISCV] Add smstateen extension
---
clang/test/Preprocessor
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mc
Author: Craig Topper (topperc)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90818.diff
5 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/test/Preprocessor/riscv-target-features.c (+9)
- (modified) llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFeatures.td (+
Author: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: 2024-05-01T20:29:25-07:00
New Revision: df91cde4da62aec22e4d384b1bc800590c7f561a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/df91cde4da62aec22e4d384b1bc800590c7f561a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/df91cde4da62aec22e4d384b1bc800590c7f561a.diff
https://github.com/rniwa closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90704
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ using namespace clang::targets;
TargetInfo *
TargetInfo::CreateTargetInfo(DiagnosticsEngine &Diags,
const std::shared_ptr &Opts) {
- llvm::Triple Triple(Opts->Triple);
+ llvm::Triple Triple(llvm::Triple::normalize(Opts->Triple)
Author: Matheus Izvekov
Date: 2024-05-02T02:02:35-03:00
New Revision: b86e0992bfa6c58be077d82d824016f590ac5d90
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b86e0992bfa6c58be077d82d824016f590ac5d90
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b86e0992bfa6c58be077d82d824016f590ac5d90.dif
https://github.com/mizvekov closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90820
This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template template
parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the negative impact of
enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by default.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Matheus Izvekov (mizvekov)
Changes
This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template template
parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the negative impact of
enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by de
@@ -27,3 +26,20 @@ namespace rdar10544564 {
X (Y::*func_mem_ptr1)() = &Y::memfunc1;
X (Y::*func_mem_ptr2)() = &Y::memfunc2;
}
+
+namespace test2 {
+ struct A {
+int val;
+void func() {}
+ };
+
+ void test() {
+decltype(&(A::val)) ptr1; // expected-error {{inv
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90786
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90820
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/h-vetinari edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90820
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/h-vetinari commented:
Despite CWG2398 not being voted in yet, the status in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/e3f42b02a4129947ca2dd820bfb63ffed83027b7/clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html#L14195-L14200
should be updated.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90820
__
h-vetinari wrote:
AFAIU, for this to be picked up by
[make_cxx_dr_status](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/www/make_cxx_dr_status)
correctly, this file should have a comment near the top like:
```
// cwg2398: 19 drafting 2016-12-03
```
and
https://github.com/zwuis updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89713
>From f6fd1e5e5f42b3c72cb5aeaf9e6d4e91d5424bee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YanzuoLiu
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 14:56:12 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Add missing check when making pointer to member
---
clang/lib/Sema
https://github.com/TSWorld1314 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85795
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zwuis updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89713
>From f6fd1e5e5f42b3c72cb5aeaf9e6d4e91d5424bee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YanzuoLiu
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 14:56:12 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Add missing check when making pointer to member
---
clang/lib/Sema
mizvekov wrote:
I had some discussion about that with @Endilll on the previous MR regarding
this core issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807
Since there is no posting at all in core about any possible solutions, I wanted
to get feedback from t
https://github.com/mizvekov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90820
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nikic created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90824
This implements the `nusw` and `nuw` flags for `getelementptr` as proposed at
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-add-nusw-and-nuw-flags-for-getelementptr/78672.
There are a bunch of places annotated with `TODO(gep_no
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu
Author: Nikita Popov (nikic)
Changes
This implements the `nusw` and `nuw` flags for `getelementptr` as proposed at
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-add-nusw-and-nuw-flags-for-getelementptr/78672.
There are a bunch of places annotated wit
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Nikita Popov (nikic)
Changes
This implements the `nusw` and `nuw` flags for `getelementptr` as proposed at
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-add-nusw-and-nuw-flags-for-getelementptr/78672.
There are a bunch of places annotated wi
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 3d65bd935a91439c483c56a966edc283a2b1130d
e6d87106fd677c98422efa97dffef600b053853c --
@@ -350,6 +350,13 @@ class ResultObjectVisitor : public
RecursiveASTVisitor {
return RecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseDecl(D);
}
+ bool TraverseDecltypeTypeLoc(DecltypeTypeLoc Node) {
martinboehme wrote:
Makes sense, I'll take a look at that!
https://git
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-05-02T08:35:13+02:00
New Revision: 597a3150e932a9423c65b5ea4b53dd431aff5865
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/597a3150e932a9423c65b5ea4b53dd431aff5865
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/597a3150e932a9423c65b5ea4b53dd431aff5865.diff
Endilll wrote:
This file is not going to be picked up by the `make_cxx_dr_status`, because
it's not in `clang/test/CXX/drs`. If we're implementing what Jason Merill
speaks of (_In deduction we can determine that P is more specialized than B,
then substitute B
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90438
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nikic updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90824
>From eb27a1b94ec807323d204b51d5c01cc22056e1c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikita Popov
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 12:11:18 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add support for getelementptr nusw and nuw
---
llvm/docs/LangRef
@@ -1133,8 +1133,8 @@ C++17 implementation status
Matching template template parameters to compatible arguments
- https://wg21.link/p0522r0";>P0522R0
- Partial (10)
+ https://wg21.link/p0522r0";>P0522R0 (DR)
+ Clang 19 (10)
c
tschuett wrote:
Could you please add a TODO here:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/e3f42b02a4129947ca2dd820bfb63ffed83027b7/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineInstr.cpp#L565
Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90824
___
cfe-commits mailing
mizvekov wrote:
Note we are not implementing the solution Jason posted on the core mailing
list, neither on the previous patch, as we have a better solution than current
GCC on this, nor on this MR, as GCC implements no such workaround and still
fails this te
Endilll wrote:
> Also, this needs to test a non-conforming mode until we finally remove the
> corresponding flag, and that is against the rules for the DR suite.
You should be able to split conforming part of the test into DR test, though.
https://github.com/
h-vetinari wrote:
> Note we are not implementing the solution Jason posted on the core mailing
> list, neither on the previous patch, as we have a better solution than
> current GCC on this, nor on this MR, as GCC implements no such workaround and
> still fai
mizvekov wrote:
It would not be splitting though, it would be wholesale duplication in that
case.
This file is the only part of the suite still testing the old non-conformant
mode, and I fail to see a test case we wouldn't be wanting to test on both.
https://
mizvekov wrote:
> Sounds like should perhaps note that we are implementing our own resolution,
> until there's an update to the cwg issue that can be referred to?
That could be. Is there another similar issue we could use as a reference on
the format for this
301 - 363 of 363 matches
Mail list logo
