@@ -2503,6 +2505,26 @@ Stmt *BlockExpr::getBody() {
// Generic Expression Routines
//===--===//
+bool Expr::mayBranchOut() const {
+ struct BranchDetector : public RecursiveASTVisitor {
+bool HasBranch =
@@ -2503,6 +2505,26 @@ Stmt *BlockExpr::getBody() {
// Generic Expression Routines
//===--===//
+bool Expr::mayBranchOut() const {
+ struct BranchDetector : public RecursiveASTVisitor {
+bool HasBranch =
egorzhdan wrote:
@compnerd I think I addressed all of your comments, let me know if this is good
to go!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84773
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-03-25T14:08:25+01:00
New Revision: e6f63a942a45e3545332cd9a43982a69a4d5667b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e6f63a942a45e3545332cd9a43982a69a4d5667b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e6f63a942a45e3545332cd9a43982a69a4d5667b.diff
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86479
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
Splitting the code across a few implementation files might be a reasonable
approach, but in general, I'm fine with how this is proceeding.
I reviewed t
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84159
___
cfe-commits
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
Basically LGTM, just a few minor things.
https://github.com/
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1912,6 +1929,10 @@ inline bool NoRet(InterpState &S, CodePtr OpPC) {
inline bool NarrowPtr(InterpS
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -199,6 +207,41 @@ bool ByteCodeExprGen::VisitCastExpr(const
CastExpr *CE) {
return true;
}
+ case CK_IntegralToPoin
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -2218,6 +2238,14 @@ inline bool GetFnPtr(InterpState &S, CodePtr OpPC, const
Function *Func) {
return true;
}
+template
amy-kwan wrote:
Hi @Abhinkop!
I was wondering if there was any progress regarding the patch to resolve the
stage 2 failure, as our bot is still red
(https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/36/builds/43929/steps/12/logs/stdio).
Please let me know if you would also like me to test any patches, a
https://github.com/llvm-beanz approved this pull request.
Nice catch! Thank you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86407
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
LGTM but this should be testable because `getAsString()` uses `printPretty()`:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/e6f63a942a45e3545332cd9a43982a69a4d5667b/clang/lib/AST/Interp/FunctionPointer.h#L53,
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/e6f
tru wrote:
> I think .natvis files should be CRLF (those are used with Visual Studio for
> debug visualizers).
Agreed, Visual Studio should handle this correctly, but who knows 🤷🏼
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86318
___
cfe-commits maili
@@ -5061,11 +5061,15 @@ void Parser::ParseMicrosoftAttributes(ParsedAttributes
&Attrs) {
IdentifierInfo *II = Tok.getIdentifierInfo();
SourceLocation NameLoc = Tok.getLocation();
ConsumeToken();
-ParsedAttr::Kind AttrKind =
-ParsedAt
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - bugprone-exception-rethrow
+
+bugprone-exception-rethrow
+==
+
+Identifies problematic exception rethrowing, especially with caught exception
+variables or empty throw statements outside catch blocks.
+
+In C++ exce
Abhinkop wrote:
> Hi @Abhinkop! I was wondering if there was any progress regarding the patch
> to resolve the stage 2 failure, as our bot is still red
> (https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/36/builds/43929/steps/12/logs/stdio).
> Please let me know if you would also like me to test any p
@@ -2503,6 +2505,26 @@ Stmt *BlockExpr::getBody() {
// Generic Expression Routines
//===--===//
+bool Expr::mayBranchOut() const {
+ struct BranchDetector : public RecursiveASTVisitor {
+bool HasBranch =
https://github.com/zahiraam ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86339
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ldrumm wrote:
On Mon Mar 25, 2024 at 1:48 PM GMT, Tobias Hieta wrote:
> > I think .natvis files should be CRLF (those are used with Visual Studio for
> > debug visualizers).
>
> Agreed, Visual Studio should handle this correctly, but who knows
> 🤷🏼
>
Thanks. I'll add a rule and update
https:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Zahira Ammarguellat (zahiraam)
Changes
Fixed the printing of templated argument list and added test case.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86339.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/TypePrinter.cpp (
llvm-beanz wrote:
Philosophically I agree with this change, but I think some subprojects may need
to adopt specific policies about how they handle files that are expected to be
specific line endings. Specifically, Clang needs testing that verifies correct
behavior on both CRLF and LF files in
@@ -2503,6 +2505,26 @@ Stmt *BlockExpr::getBody() {
// Generic Expression Routines
//===--===//
+bool Expr::mayBranchOut() const {
+ struct BranchDetector : public RecursiveASTVisitor {
+bool HasBranch =
@@ -2503,6 +2505,26 @@ Stmt *BlockExpr::getBody() {
// Generic Expression Routines
//===--===//
+bool Expr::mayBranchOut() const {
+ struct BranchDetector : public RecursiveASTVisitor {
+bool HasBranch =
@@ -2503,6 +2505,26 @@ Stmt *BlockExpr::getBody() {
// Generic Expression Routines
//===--===//
+bool Expr::mayBranchOut() const {
+ struct BranchDetector : public RecursiveASTVisitor {
+bool HasBranch =
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85398
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1295,11 +1295,13 @@ double4 trunc(double4);
/// true, across
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1295,11 +1295,13 @@ double4
https://github.com/usx95 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85398
>From 0654f624b3b60026398e8b0168623a85e3129630 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 13:19:36 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [codegen] Emit cleanups for branch in stmt-expr and coro
suspe
ycdtosa wrote:
@AaronBallman I finally got some time to prepare this PR, but I am not familiar
with the approval process.
It also seems that you have commit rights, so there!
Still, I fell the test might be incomplete.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86486
___
Author: Chris B
Date: 2024-03-25T09:16:18-05:00
New Revision: ded6252dfd96ee8904b6d2250bc9e4841ca5c802
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ded6252dfd96ee8904b6d2250bc9e4841ca5c802
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ded6252dfd96ee8904b6d2250bc9e4841ca5c802.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/llvm-beanz closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86323
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85398
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85398
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
Author: Balazs Benics
Date: 2024-03-25T15:24:03+01:00
New Revision: 32b828306e346bc8e86c0b763f3514329de60ed1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/32b828306e346bc8e86c0b763f3514329de60ed1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/32b828306e346bc8e86c0b763f3514329de60ed1.diff
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84823
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
I didn't look too hard at the codegen bits, but the Expr bits look good to me.
Perhaps we want this test to live in CodeGen rather than CodeGenCoroutines
given that it covers so many non-coroutine test cases as well?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86486
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86486
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85398
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Tom Honermann
Date: 2024-03-25T10:39:05-04:00
New Revision: bea17ff652bc49b2de8d6be04f77d28170a78be9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bea17ff652bc49b2de8d6be04f77d28170a78be9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bea17ff652bc49b2de8d6be04f77d28170a78be9.diff
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
Thank you for the fix! I have another suggested test case, and please be sure
to add a release note to clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst so users know about the
fix. Also, I think AttrDocs.td should be updated to document the fact that
`always_destroy` will
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86486
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tahonermann closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85529
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ struct A { ~A(); };
}
namespace test5 {
+struct A { ~A(); };
+[[clang::always_destroy]] A a; // no warning
+}
+
AaronBallman wrote:
```suggestion
struct A { ~A(); };
[[clang::always_destroy]] A a; // no warning
void func() {
[[clang::alw
https://github.com/usx95 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85398
>From 0654f624b3b60026398e8b0168623a85e3129630 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 13:19:36 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [codegen] Emit cleanups for branch in stmt-expr and coro
suspe
usx95 wrote:
> Perhaps we want this test to live in CodeGen rather than CodeGenCoroutines
> given that it covers so many non-coroutine test cases as well?
Makes sense. I split the tests into coroutine and stmt-expr (didn't want to
depend on "Inputs/coroutine.h" from CodegenCXX).
https://gith
https://github.com/llvm-beanz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85716
>From 4a11a73b4dd41637b1d730489954c2994489d6be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Bieneman
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:30:41 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [NFC] Refactor ConstantArrayType size storage
In PR #793
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85716
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
https://github.com/hokein created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86512
This patch implements a `__is_bitwise_copyable` builtin in clang.
The bitwise copyable types act as the trivially copyable types, but they
support a wider range of types (e.g. classes with virtual methods) -- the
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Haojian Wu (hokein)
Changes
This patch implements a `__is_bitwise_copyable` builtin in clang.
The bitwise copyable types act as the trivially copyable types, but they
support a wider range of types (e.g. classes with virtual methods) -- t
https://github.com/ZequanWu approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83961
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ZequanWu edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83961
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -102,23 +104,24 @@ struct llvm::TimeTraceProfiler {
llvm::get_thread_name(ThreadName);
}
- void begin(std::string Name, llvm::function_ref Detail) {
-Stack.emplace_back(ClockType::now(), TimePointType(), std::move(Name),
- Detail());
+ Time
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86512
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86411
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 5a744776bb6192dae04360609457c9f49dce43a2
481627e3bacf2e9fa5ca71adece32e4ca5fa94ef --
@@ -804,10 +804,38 @@ Check for performance anti-patterns when using Grand
Central Dispatch.
.. _optin-performance-Padding:
-optin.performance.Padding
-"
+optin.performance.Padding (C, C++, ObjC)
+
Check for ex
@@ -804,10 +804,38 @@ Check for performance anti-patterns when using Grand
Central Dispatch.
.. _optin-performance-Padding:
-optin.performance.Padding
-"
+optin.performance.Padding (C, C++, ObjC)
+
Check for ex
@@ -804,10 +804,38 @@ Check for performance anti-patterns when using Grand
Central Dispatch.
.. _optin-performance-Padding:
-optin.performance.Padding
-"
+optin.performance.Padding (C, C++, ObjC)
+
Check for ex
@@ -804,10 +804,38 @@ Check for performance anti-patterns when using Grand
Central Dispatch.
.. _optin-performance-Padding:
-optin.performance.Padding
-"
+optin.performance.Padding (C, C++, ObjC)
+
Check for ex
https://github.com/steakhal requested changes to this pull request.
The grammar seems good.
I have further concerns inline.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86411
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/c
robincaloudis wrote:
@llvm-beanz, thanks for the review. I miss write access. Can you merge the PR?
Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86407
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+//===- SemaOpenACC.h - Semantic Analysis for OpenACC constructs
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
ldrumm wrote:
> Should we come up with an expected filename format that we can use with
> gitattributes and rename the existing files rather than just listing each
> file that has special needs by itself?
Either way, the author has to do or know *something*. I'm not a fan of "magic"
like this
AaronBallman wrote:
> > Can you also add a test showing the difference between `-Wformat
> > -Wformat-signedness` and `-Wformat-signedness` by itself (which does
> > nothing)?
>
> With the current implementation `-Wformat-signedness` by itself actually turn
> on the signedness warnings. This
https://github.com/AaronBallman requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70307
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -19959,7 +19961,10 @@ bool Sema::DiagRuntimeBehavior(SourceLocation Loc,
ArrayRef Stmts,
case ExpressionEvaluationContext::ConstantEvaluated:
case ExpressionEvaluationContext::ImmediateFunctionContext:
// Relevant diagnostics should be produced by constant evaluatio
@@ -11523,9 +11525,9 @@ static void DiagnoseBadShiftValues(Sema& S, ExprResult
&LHS, ExprResult &RHS,
}
S.Diag(Loc, diag::warn_shift_result_gt_typewidth)
-<< HexResult.str() << Result.getMinSignedBits() << LHSType
-<< Left.getBitWidth() << LHS.get()->getSourceRang
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70307
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2805,7 +2805,7 @@ static bool handleIntIntBinOp(EvalInfo &Info, const Expr
*E, const APSInt &LHS,
unsigned SA = (unsigned) RHS.getLimitedValue(LHS.getBitWidth()-1);
if (SA != RHS) {
Info.CCEDiag(E, diag::note_constexpr_large_shift)
-<< RHS << E->getTy
@@ -11428,7 +11428,7 @@ static bool isScopedEnumerationType(QualType T) {
return false;
}
-static void DiagnoseBadShiftValues(Sema& S, ExprResult &LHS, ExprResult &RHS,
+static void DiagnoseBadShiftValues(Sema &S, ExprResult &LHS, ExprResult &RHS,
AaronBallm
@@ -7516,28 +7516,23 @@ void Sema::checkCall(NamedDecl *FDecl, const
FunctionProtoType *Proto,
}
}
-auto *CallerFD = dyn_cast(CurContext);
-bool IsCalleeStreaming =
-(ExtInfo.AArch64SMEAttributes & FunctionType::SME_PStateSMEnabledMask);
-bool Is
@@ -1390,6 +1390,9 @@ def MultiGPU: DiagGroup<"multi-gpu">;
// libc and the CRT to be skipped.
def AVRRtlibLinkingQuirks : DiagGroup<"avr-rtlib-linking-quirks">;
+// A warning group AArch64 related to SME function attribues.
sdesmalen-arm wrote:
nit: Sorry, j
@@ -3717,6 +3717,16 @@ def err_sme_definition_using_za_in_non_sme_target :
Error<
"function using ZA state requires 'sme'">;
def err_sme_definition_using_zt0_in_non_sme2_target : Error<
"function using ZT0 state requires 'sme2'">;
+def warn_sme_streaming_pass_return_vl_to_
@@ -0,0 +1,278 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --function-signature --check-attributes --check-globals
--include-generated-funcs
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-none-linux-gnu -target-feature -v9.5a -S
-emit-llvm -
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Cyndy Ishida (cyndyishida)
Changes
InstallAPI takes a json list of headers that is typically generated from a
build system like Xcode based on a project's attributes. Sometimes, maintainers
may want to alter this for tapi input. Using e.g
@@ -0,0 +1,278 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --function-signature --check-attributes --check-globals
--include-generated-funcs
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-none-linux-gnu -target-feature -v9.5a -S
-emit-llvm -
farzonl wrote:
@robincaloudis Thanks this is what I was looking for.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86407
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86522
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86522
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
https://github.com/farzonl approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86407
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/farzonl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86407
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Robin Caloudis
Date: 2024-03-25T12:00:43-04:00
New Revision: 2b351a3b76b8e58414fb51ff52978c79904ab331
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2b351a3b76b8e58414fb51ff52978c79904ab331
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2b351a3b76b8e58414fb51ff52978c79904ab331.diff
farzonl wrote:
> @llvm-beanz, thanks for the review. I miss write access. Can you merge the
> PR? Thanks.
I got you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86407
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bi
Author: Aaron Ballman
Date: 2024-03-25T12:01:48-04:00
New Revision: 6fd3677fb4f4e806f2efa43bfa814aaf063c506c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6fd3677fb4f4e806f2efa43bfa814aaf063c506c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6fd3677fb4f4e806f2efa43bfa814aaf063c506c.diff
https://github.com/kees updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84428
>From eb5138b45fa450737600050ad8dabdcb27513d42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kees Cook
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:03:09 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [Clang][Sema]: Allow flexible arrays in unions and alone
in structs
https://github.com/farzonl requested changes to this pull request.
This isn't going to work. You have to also fix the tests aswell.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86440
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.ll
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84428
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84428
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
https://github.com/ributzka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86522
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86440
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/farzonl approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86440
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/llvm-beanz approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86440
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86440
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86440
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
@@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ struct A { ~A(); };
}
namespace test5 {
+struct A { ~A(); };
+[[clang::always_destroy]] A a; // no warning
+}
+
ycdtosa wrote:
Yup. I will do.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86486
___
https://github.com/llvm-beanz approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86071
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Sirraide created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86526
This implements support for the `= delete("message")` syntax that was only just
added to C++26
([P2573R2](https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2573R2.html#proposal-scope)).
The major parts are all done, from what
101 - 200 of 448 matches
Mail list logo
