llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Younan Zhang (zyn0217)
Changes
We preserve the trailing requires-expression during the lambda
expression transformation. In order to get those referenced parameters
inside a requires-expression properly resolved to the instantiated
decls, w
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
This makes sense to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79568
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Andreu Carminati
Date: 2024-01-26T09:36:59-08:00
New Revision: be8e462a0c27e4850020c96290cabdcdbcab46f3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/be8e462a0c27e4850020c96290cabdcdbcab46f3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/be8e462a0c27e4850020c96290cabdcdbcab46f3.di
https://github.com/topperc closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76432
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Amy Kwan
Date: 2024-01-26T12:39:25-05:00
New Revision: d5fe1bd081ec129a1259cccf5171692d87dbd1f3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d5fe1bd081ec129a1259cccf5171692d87dbd1f3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d5fe1bd081ec129a1259cccf5171692d87dbd1f3.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/amy-kwan closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79252
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Fznamznon updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74512
>From 169d962b64b8ae242c3a6d332677296cf7503839 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Podchishchaeva, Mariya"
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:28:44 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang] Avoid -Wshadow warning when init-capture
Fznamznon wrote:
Ok, now it emits `-Wshadow-uncaptured-local` when lambda doesn't capture this,
and `-Wshadow` when it does.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74512
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org
@@ -8395,10 +8395,11 @@ void Sema::CheckShadow(NamedDecl *D, NamedDecl
*ShadowedDecl,
unsigned WarningDiag = diag::warn_decl_shadow;
SourceLocation CaptureLoc;
- if (isa(D) && isa(ShadowedDecl) && NewDC &&
- isa(NewDC)) {
+ if (isa(D) && NewDC && isa(NewDC)) {
https://github.com/shafik commented:
Thank you for the Fix! Your summary should be a description of the problem and
how your solution fixes that problem. You should also link to the github issue
in the summary.
Questions about the changes in the PR should go as a comment to the PR.
Please add
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+# Tests for basic Debuginfod functionality
+
+Because the Debuginfod protocol is a simple HTTP path-based system, one can
+mimic a Debuginfod server by setting up a directory structure to reflect the
+protocol properly. That's how all these tests operate. We over
AdvenamTacet wrote:
I rewrote all functions with turned off instrumentation (I removed
`_LIBCPP_STRING_INTERNAL_MEMORY_ACCESS` completely) and I see no change in
behavior. Error happens in the very same way with the very same shadow memory
(and backtrace).
I don't see where annotations can be
ldionne wrote:
@AaronBallman We're struggling a bit to find the right person to help review
this -- do you know who would be a good candidate? Hui is very familiar with
libc++ but he's less familiar with codegen, and I'm not very useful in that
area of the project :-).
https://github.com/llvm
davemgreen wrote:
It looks like this needs to update testAArch64CPUArchList too. Otherwise it LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79614
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/c
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -fcxx-exceptions -verify %s
+
+#if !__has_builtin(__builtin_verbose_trap)
+#error
+#endif
+
+constexpr char const* constMsg1 = "hello";
+char const* const constMsg2 = "hello";
+char const constMsg3[] = "hello";
+
+templ
https://github.com/pileghoff edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79588
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/e-kud edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77608
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/e-kud edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77608
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/e-kud edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77608
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -245,10 +265,15 @@ int *nothingIsCertain(int x, int y) {
if (x >= 2)
return 0;
int *mem = (
pileghoff wrote:
> Thank you for the Fix! Your summary should be a description of the problem
> and how your solution fixes that problem. You should also link to the github
> issue in the summary.
>
> Questions about the changes in the PR should go as a comment to the PR.
>
> Please add a rel
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79360
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79360
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
https://github.com/efriedma-quic edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75371
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2456,6 +2461,139 @@ static RValue
EmitHipStdParUnsupportedBuiltin(CodeGenFunction *CGF,
return RValue::get(CGF->Builder.CreateCall(UBF, Args));
}
+template
+void RecursivelyClearPaddingImpl(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Value *Ptr, QualType
Ty, size_t CurrentStartOffset, size
@@ -2456,6 +2461,139 @@ static RValue
EmitHipStdParUnsupportedBuiltin(CodeGenFunction *CGF,
return RValue::get(CGF->Builder.CreateCall(UBF, Args));
}
+template
+void RecursivelyClearPaddingImpl(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Value *Ptr, QualType
Ty, size_t CurrentStartOffset, size
@@ -2456,6 +2461,139 @@ static RValue
EmitHipStdParUnsupportedBuiltin(CodeGenFunction *CGF,
return RValue::get(CGF->Builder.CreateCall(UBF, Args));
}
+template
+void RecursivelyClearPaddingImpl(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Value *Ptr, QualType
Ty, size_t CurrentStartOffset, size
@@ -2327,6 +2327,25 @@ Sema::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(FunctionDecl *FDecl,
unsigned BuiltinID,
}
case Builtin::BI__builtin_launder:
return SemaBuiltinLaunder(*this, TheCall);
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_clear_padding: {
+const Expr *PtrArg = TheCall->getArg(0)->Ig
@@ -60,9 +60,14 @@
#include "llvm/Support/ScopedPrinter.h"
#include "llvm/TargetParser/AArch64TargetParser.h"
#include "llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.h"
+#include
#include
#include
+
+
+#include
efriedma-quic wrote:
iostream is forbidden in LLVM co
@@ -2456,6 +2461,139 @@ static RValue
EmitHipStdParUnsupportedBuiltin(CodeGenFunction *CGF,
return RValue::get(CGF->Builder.CreateCall(UBF, Args));
}
+template
+void RecursivelyClearPaddingImpl(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Value *Ptr, QualType
Ty, size_t CurrentStartOffset, size
@@ -2456,6 +2461,139 @@ static RValue
EmitHipStdParUnsupportedBuiltin(CodeGenFunction *CGF,
return RValue::get(CGF->Builder.CreateCall(UBF, Args));
}
+template
+void RecursivelyClearPaddingImpl(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Value *Ptr, QualType
Ty, size_t CurrentStartOffset, size
@@ -2327,6 +2327,25 @@ Sema::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(FunctionDecl *FDecl,
unsigned BuiltinID,
}
case Builtin::BI__builtin_launder:
return SemaBuiltinLaunder(*this, TheCall);
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_clear_padding: {
+const Expr *PtrArg = TheCall->getArg(0)->Ig
@@ -2456,6 +2461,139 @@ static RValue
EmitHipStdParUnsupportedBuiltin(CodeGenFunction *CGF,
return RValue::get(CGF->Builder.CreateCall(UBF, Args));
}
+template
+void RecursivelyClearPaddingImpl(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Value *Ptr, QualType
Ty, size_t CurrentStartOffset, size
@@ -2327,6 +2327,25 @@ Sema::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(FunctionDecl *FDecl,
unsigned BuiltinID,
}
case Builtin::BI__builtin_launder:
return SemaBuiltinLaunder(*this, TheCall);
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_clear_padding: {
+const Expr *PtrArg = TheCall->getArg(0)->Ig
@@ -4315,6 +4453,13 @@ RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitBuiltinExpr(const GlobalDecl
GD, unsigned BuiltinID,
return RValue::get(Ptr);
}
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_clear_padding: {
+const Expr *Op = E->getArg(0);
+Value *Address = EmitScalarExpr(Op);
---
@@ -2456,6 +2461,139 @@ static RValue
EmitHipStdParUnsupportedBuiltin(CodeGenFunction *CGF,
return RValue::get(CGF->Builder.CreateCall(UBF, Args));
}
+template
+void RecursivelyClearPaddingImpl(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Value *Ptr, QualType
Ty, size_t CurrentStartOffset, size
https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
Please clang-format changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75371
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,556 @@
+// RUN: mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: %clang++ %s -o %t/run
+// RUN: %t/run
efriedma-quic wrote:
Tests that need to actually run generated code go into the test-suite repo. (I
don't think that's really necessary here, though; if you're going to start
@@ -2456,6 +2461,139 @@ static RValue
EmitHipStdParUnsupportedBuiltin(CodeGenFunction *CGF,
return RValue::get(CGF->Builder.CreateCall(UBF, Args));
}
+template
+void RecursivelyClearPaddingImpl(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Value *Ptr, QualType
Ty, size_t CurrentStartOffset, size
pileghoff wrote:
I can also see i broke the `n3042.c` test. Stuff like `if (null_val) {}` now
throws a warning, since `null_val` is a constant.
I would expect this warning to be okay in that scenario?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79588
_
efriedma-quic wrote:
Also, please fix the title so it isn't prefixed with "[libc++]"; the intent is
for this to be used in libc++, but it's proposing a clang intrinsic.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75371
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-c
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -fcxx-exceptions -verify %s
+
+#if !__has_builtin(__builtin_verbose_trap)
+#error
+#endif
+
+constexpr char const* constMsg1 = "hello";
+char const* const constMsg2 = "hello";
+char const constMsg3[] = "hello";
+
+templ
https://github.com/Sh0g0-1758 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78338
>From b98f02d4c155b5be9bd4f5b2e4bf73720a81f39a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sh0g0-1758
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 01:24:17 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] Fix : more detailed no expected directive message
---
cla
https://github.com/HighCommander4 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79617
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Nour1248
Date: 2024-01-26T14:21:07-05:00
New Revision: 6c74d8083bd97ff47cadb43cdf03da35f450389a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6c74d8083bd97ff47cadb43cdf03da35f450389a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6c74d8083bd97ff47cadb43cdf03da35f450389a.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/HighCommander4 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79617
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66514
>From 5014d98b1893225ebdcc1e9ce0941b348f504740 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 15:51:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][Diagnostics] Highlight code snippets
Ad
Author: Ziqing Luo
Date: 2024-01-26T11:23:15-08:00
New Revision: 2a068507016e476893b6b1b9c55b255dbae5829e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2a068507016e476893b6b1b9c55b255dbae5829e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2a068507016e476893b6b1b9c55b255dbae5829e.diff
LO
https://github.com/ziqingluo-90 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78380
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -13288,9 +13288,23 @@ EvaluateComparisonBinaryOperator(EvalInfo &Info, const
BinaryOperator *E,
// Reject differing bases from the normal codepath; we special-case
// comparisons to null.
if (!HasSameBase(LHSValue, RHSValue)) {
- auto DiagComparison = [&] (
https://github.com/srcarroll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79626
>From ab475c9ffb7c3562bad4772389e97b82e9f110c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:55:06 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Add elementwise criteria to match.structured.body
---
.../Linalg/Transf
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79549
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -13288,9 +13288,23 @@ EvaluateComparisonBinaryOperator(EvalInfo &Info, const
BinaryOperator *E,
// Reject differing bases from the normal codepath; we special-case
// comparisons to null.
if (!HasSameBase(LHSValue, RHSValue)) {
- auto DiagComparison = [&] (
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -fcxx-exceptions -verify %s
+
+#if !__has_builtin(__builtin_verbose_trap)
+#error
+#endif
+
+constexpr char const* constMsg1 = "hello";
+char const* const constMsg2 = "hello";
+char const constMsg3[] = "hello";
+
+templ
https://github.com/ilovepi closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79031
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ilovepi wrote:
Abandoning in favor of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79256
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79031
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
petrhosek wrote:
I tried this branch on our Windows builders although I'm not sure if it's
related or not to this patch:
```
# COMPILED WITH
C:/b/s/w/ir/x/w/llvm_build/./bin/clang-cl.exe
C:\b\s\w\ir\x\w\github-H-G-Hristov-llvm-project\libcxx\test\libcxx\fuzzing\random.pass.cpp
--driver-mode=g+
Zingam wrote:
@petrhosek It is not related. It was supposedly fixed by this:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79619
I've been observing the chromium Windows CI failing for a while. Let's see if
the above patch fixes it. I'll rebase now this one now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-projec
https://github.com/Zingam updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79032
>From e03452fda84a5284420bba1913299b68caabb6cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zingam
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:35:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Revert "Revert "[libc++][format] P2637R3: Member `visit`
(`std::basi
Zingam wrote:
@petrhosek According to the log, the tests in this patch pass. Could you please
try again. I'll wait a while and if there is not negative feedback I'll reland
the patch.
> https://logs.chromium.org/logs/fuchsia/led/phosek_google.com/62644843c966785c9dedf065a79d80df8734b4df5ff7703
https://github.com/shafik commented:
I believe the problem is that `DiagComparison` is capturing the locals
`LHSValue` and `RHSValue` the lambda is being returned, the local are not
longer in lifetime but we are calling `toString` on them.
Maybe there is some SSO going on here that changes wh
https://github.com/shafik edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79522
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
chelini wrote:
Is it ready for review? Is marked as "draft".
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79626
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/srcarroll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79626
>From ab475c9ffb7c3562bad4772389e97b82e9f110c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:55:06 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Add elementwise criteria to match.structured.body
---
.../Linalg/Transf
https://github.com/AdvenamTacet converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79522
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/srcarroll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79626
>From ab475c9ffb7c3562bad4772389e97b82e9f110c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:55:06 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add elementwise criteria to match.structured.body
---
.../Linalg/Tr
https://github.com/srcarroll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79626
>From ab475c9ffb7c3562bad4772389e97b82e9f110c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:55:06 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add elementwise criteria to match.structured.body
---
.../Linalg/Tr
https://github.com/srcarroll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79626
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/srcarroll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79626
>From ab475c9ffb7c3562bad4772389e97b82e9f110c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:55:06 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add elementwise criteria to match.structured.body
---
.../Linalg/Tr
https://github.com/srcarroll ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79626
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir
Author: None (srcarroll)
Changes
As far as I am aware, there is no simple way to match on elementwise ops. I
propose to add an `elementwise` criteria to the `match.structured.body` op.
Although my only hesitation is that elementwise is not only
https://github.com/Zingam updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79032
>From e03452fda84a5284420bba1913299b68caabb6cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zingam
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:35:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Revert "Revert "[libc++][format] P2637R3: Member `visit`
(`std::basi
AdvenamTacet wrote:
> I think we need to understand the problem better.
Agree as well, I changed PR to WIP. But I don't really know where to look now.
> I think popping into a debugger would likely help here.
@shafik What is the correct way of building a single test, so we have access
to a
https://github.com/spaits updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79371
From 3e0c3db0d8500e5f2111e3603da3d8f2b1cd261d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gabor Spaits
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:21:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 01/16] [Sema]Substitue template parameter packs when deduced
from fu
https://github.com/Lewuathe updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76316
>From a5810363e546da073543cb2d62cceb956c46b2e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kai Sasaki
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 15:53:54 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [mlir][complex] Prevent underflow in complex.abs
---
.../Comp
https://github.com/ldionne milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73618
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shafik edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78400
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shafik commented:
nitpick
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78400
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3061,11 +3062,19 @@ bool Sema::SubstDefaultArgument(
/*ForDefinition*/ false);
if (addInstantiatedParametersToScope(FD, PatternFD, *LIS, TemplateArgs))
return true;
+ if (FD->isOutOfLine()) {
+TemplateArgumentList *CurrentTemplateArgumen
https://github.com/jhuber6 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79660
Summary:
Currently, the AMDGPU toolchain accepts not passing `-mcpu` as a means
to create a sort of "generic" IR. The resulting IR will not contain any
target dependent attributes and can then be inserted into ano
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu
Author: Joseph Huber (jhuber6)
Changes
Summary:
Currently, the AMDGPU toolchain accepts not passing `-mcpu` as a means
to create a sort of "generic" IR. The resulting IR will not contain any
target dependent attributes and can then be inse
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 55c6d9103444aaf70bf680c3768c14e8649bf580
63d0328f9b17b833762ad599ee97381158958f3b --
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79660
>From ba04b20709cbf76ef6f1490081aecc125bdafec7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 16:25:30 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [AMDGPU] Do not emit arch dependent macros with unspecified
cpu
https://github.com/jkorous-apple approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78763
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78905
>From 3a5987046ea03dc552e1dc54ca1c60c4afe984cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 11:52:11 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Resolve FIXME i
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ def err_verify_invalid_no_diags : Error<
"%select{expected|'expected-no-diagnostics'}0 directive cannot follow "
"%select{'expected-no-diagnostics' directive|other expected directives}0">;
def err_verify_no_directives : Error<
-"no expected direc
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ def err_verify_invalid_no_diags : Error<
"%select{expected|'expected-no-diagnostics'}0 directive cannot follow "
"%select{'expected-no-diagnostics' directive|other expected directives}0">;
def err_verify_no_directives : Error<
-"no expected direc
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ def err_verify_invalid_no_diags : Error<
"%select{expected|'expected-no-diagnostics'}0 directive cannot follow "
"%select{'expected-no-diagnostics' directive|other expected directives}0">;
jrtc27 wrote:
This looks like it needs templ
@@ -274,30 +274,31 @@ void AMDGPUTargetInfo::getTargetDefines(const LangOptions
&Opts,
else
Builder.defineMacro("__R600__");
- if (GPUKind != llvm::AMDGPU::GK_NONE) {
-StringRef CanonName = isAMDGCN(getTriple()) ?
- getArchNameAMDGCN(GPUKind) : getArchNameR600
yxsamliu wrote:
LGTM. AFAIK only device libs compile OpenCL code without -mcpu. I don't think
it uses any of these predefined macros.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79660
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79660
>From ba04b20709cbf76ef6f1490081aecc125bdafec7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 16:25:30 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AMDGPU] Do not emit arch dependent macros with
unspecified c
Author: Ziqing Luo
Date: 2024-01-26T15:43:46-08:00
New Revision: 9816863dd439cd60c96d5764c4c21ca1a7f3d8da
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9816863dd439cd60c96d5764c4c21ca1a7f3d8da
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9816863dd439cd60c96d5764c4c21ca1a7f3d8da.diff
LO
https://github.com/ziqingluo-90 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77148
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/trcrsired created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79667
The wasm unwind build appears to be dysfunctional, likely because the author
has only supplied a customized LLVM build on request, rather than a fully
functional patch.
This patch fixes the build
>From 39bc0
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it i
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libunwind
Author: cqwrteur (trcrsired)
Changes
The wasm unwind build appears to be dysfunctional, likely because the author
has only supplied a customized LLVM build on request, rather than a fully
functional patch.
This patch fixes the build
---
Ful
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 55c6d9103444aaf70bf680c3768c14e8649bf580
39bc0171e7c07e367446dd1abdc56fd918013a9d --
trcrsired wrote:
i do not know whether old code should be formatted or not, because the LLVM dev
said do not format old code
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79667
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org
201 - 300 of 387 matches
Mail list logo
