Author: Paul T Robinson
Date: 2024-01-10T10:53:11-05:00
New Revision: 5934a6ee5967f795634d5161d46da8412be96404
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5934a6ee5967f795634d5161d46da8412be96404
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5934a6ee5967f795634d5161d46da8412be96404.dif
https://github.com/pogo59 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77525
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -978,6 +978,20 @@ bool Parser::ConsumeAndStoreFunctionPrologue(CachedTokens
&Toks) {
} else {
break;
}
+ // Pack indexing
+ if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus26 && Tok.is(tok::ellipsis) &&
ldionne wrote:
@philnik777 This would requir
11happy wrote:
Sure Sure, I will take up another issue.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77586
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -978,6 +978,20 @@ bool Parser::ConsumeAndStoreFunctionPrologue(CachedTokens
&Toks) {
} else {
break;
}
+ // Pack indexing
+ if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus26 && Tok.is(tok::ellipsis) &&
erichkeane wrote:
Would a change like that b
alexey-bataev wrote:
> @alexey-bataev : In particular I'd like to make you aware of what I've done
> here, since this is similar to the work you've done before/will affect it. It
> is currently my thought to make the OMPArraySectionExpr type a generic
> 'ArraySectionExpr' type in the not-so-di
https://github.com/Pierre-vh edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76955
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Pierre-vh edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76954
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -978,6 +978,20 @@ bool Parser::ConsumeAndStoreFunctionPrologue(CachedTokens
&Toks) {
} else {
break;
}
+ // Pack indexing
+ if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus26 && Tok.is(tok::ellipsis) &&
ldionne wrote:
I think it might be possible
https://github.com/alexey-bataev approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77617
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -978,6 +978,20 @@ bool Parser::ConsumeAndStoreFunctionPrologue(CachedTokens
&Toks) {
} else {
break;
}
+ // Pack indexing
+ if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus26 && Tok.is(tok::ellipsis) &&
philnik777 wrote:
> @philnik777 This would r
@@ -4193,6 +4194,13 @@ void CXXNameMangler::mangleType(const PackExpansionType
*T) {
mangleType(T->getPattern());
}
+void CXXNameMangler::mangleType(const PackIndexingType *T) {
cor3ntin wrote:
I did open an issue there https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/c
ZequanWu wrote:
Hi, this breaks our build. I don't know how to update the expectation to match
Current expectation:
DCHECK_OK(foo); //
expected-error@components/reporting/util/status_macros.h:*
{{{CHECK,DCHECK,ASSERT,EXPECT}_OK do not accept a type other than Status or
StatusOr.}}
https
sethp wrote:
@ZequanWu would either of these work for you?:
```c++
DCHECK_OK(foo); // expected-error@components/reporting/util/status_macros.h:*
{{{CHECK,DCHECK,ASSERT,EXPECT}_OK do not accept a type other than Status or
StatusOr.}}}
```
or
```c++
DCHECK_OK(foo); //
expected-error-re@comp
https://github.com/kstoimenov approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77210
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ extern "C" {
#define __isb(i) __builtin_arm_isb(i)
#endif
-/* 8.4 Hints */
+/* 7.4 Hints */
voltur01 wrote:
HTML version has the extra `.`
https://arm-software.github.io/acle/main/acle.html#hints but the PDF one does
not
https://github.co
sethp wrote:
Though, maybe we should revert this change, and gate it behind a new suffix
(`expected-error-ext`?), since it is a breaking change to the verifier's
mini-language.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77326
___
cfe-commits mailing
ZequanWu wrote:
> @ZequanWu would either of these work for you?
>
> ```c++
> DCHECK_OK(foo); //
> expected-error@components/reporting/util/status_macros.h:*
> {{{CHECK,DCHECK,ASSERT,EXPECT}_OK do not accept a type other than Status or
> StatusOr.}}}
> ```
>
> or
>
> ```c++
> DCHECK_OK(foo
https://github.com/hanhanW closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77409
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
banach-space wrote:
Thanks for addressing my comment!
The overall logic LGTM, but please wait for somebody to review the finer RISC-V
details before landing this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77588
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commi
qmfrederik wrote:
@davidchisnall Apologies, that was a fat-finger mistake while addressing the
latest feedback. CI is green now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77255
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
sethp wrote:
Of course, thank you for tracking it down!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77326
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -4193,6 +4194,13 @@ void CXXNameMangler::mangleType(const PackExpansionType
*T) {
mangleType(T->getPattern());
}
+void CXXNameMangler::mangleType(const PackIndexingType *T) {
cor3ntin wrote:
@rnk I was told that you could help with the microsoft abi for
erichkeane wrote:
> > @alexey-bataev : In particular I'd like to make you aware of what I've done
> > here, since this is similar to the work you've done before/will affect it.
> > It is currently my thought to make the OMPArraySectionExpr type a generic
> > 'ArraySectionExpr' type in the not-
yi-wu-arm wrote:
> This patch broke the Solaris build:
>
> ```
> FAILED:
> tools/flang/runtime/CMakeFiles/obj.FortranRuntime.dir/extensions.cpp.o
> [...]
> /vol/llvm/src/llvm-project/dist/flang/runtime/extensions.cpp:60:24: error:
> use of undeclared identifier 'LOGIN_NAME_MAX'
>60 | co
@@ -475,13 +475,21 @@ struct S {
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
namespace dependent_conversion_function_id_lookup {
- template struct A {
+ struct A1 {
cor3ntin wrote:
can you add a comment with the number of the relevant github issue(s) ? thanks
https://githu
Author: Frederik Carlier
Date: 2024-01-10T16:52:13Z
New Revision: 1d5106d69cf475215887c42834158d710e586f1b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d5106d69cf475215887c42834158d710e586f1b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d5106d69cf475215887c42834158d710e586f1b.diff
L
https://github.com/davidchisnall closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77255
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
MaxEW707 wrote:
> Users (Chromium included) use recent versions of Clang that are not vendored
> by Microsoft. Users can also use the LLVM OSS releases. I think most users
> probably won't notice the compile time regression, and it will silently go
> away the next time the update MSVC, but if
@@ -324,6 +355,57 @@ void error_fseek_0(void) {
fclose(F);
}
+void error_fseeko_0(void) {
+ FILE *F = fopen("file", "r");
+ if (!F)
+return;
+ int rc = fseeko(F, 0, SEEK_SET);
+ if (rc) {
+int IsFEof = feof(F), IsFError = ferror(F);
+// Get ferror or no error
@@ -324,6 +355,57 @@ void error_fseek_0(void) {
fclose(F);
}
+void error_fseeko_0(void) {
+ FILE *F = fopen("file", "r");
+ if (!F)
+return;
+ int rc = fseeko(F, 0, SEEK_SET);
+ if (rc) {
+int IsFEof = feof(F), IsFError = ferror(F);
+// Get ferror or no error
https://github.com/balazske deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77580
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat approved this pull request.
I don't see any issue.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77613
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -324,6 +355,57 @@ void error_fseek_0(void) {
fclose(F);
}
+void error_fseeko_0(void) {
+ FILE *F = fopen("file", "r");
+ if (!F)
+return;
+ int rc = fseeko(F, 0, SEEK_SET);
+ if (rc) {
+int IsFEof = feof(F), IsFError = ferror(F);
+// Get ferror or no error
@@ -324,6 +355,57 @@ void error_fseek_0(void) {
fclose(F);
}
+void error_fseeko_0(void) {
+ FILE *F = fopen("file", "r");
+ if (!F)
+return;
+ int rc = fseeko(F, 0, SEEK_SET);
+ if (rc) {
+int IsFEof = feof(F), IsFError = ferror(F);
+// Get ferror or no error
@@ -268,8 +268,12 @@ class StreamChecker : public Checkerhttps://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77580
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: CarolineConcatto
Date: 2024-01-10T17:12:14Z
New Revision: 14e7dac92a32f900a66cb868be89c964b687a825
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/14e7dac92a32f900a66cb868be89c964b687a825
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/14e7dac92a32f900a66cb868be89c964b687a825.diff
L
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76844
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SamTebbs33 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77338
>From 091048a63e9c4ac21fd38b8e7483953c602c714f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam Tebbs
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 10:47:01 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Rename and enable boolean get, set, create and
undef f
@@ -1321,12 +1321,17 @@ def SVSET_3_BF16 : SInst<"svset3[_{d}]", "33id", "b",
MergeNone, "", [IsTupleSet
def SVSET_4_BF16 : SInst<"svset4[_{d}]", "44id", "b", MergeNone, "",
[IsTupleSet], [ImmCheck<1, ImmCheck0_3>]>;
}
-let TargetGuard = "sve2p1" in {
- def SVGET_2_B : SIns
https://github.com/preames approved this pull request.
LGTM
We should explore options for merging the option processing code for options
supported by both clang and flang, but that's explicitly future work.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77588
_
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77303
>From aa7ebd9f13d8b7a58f87dc8b00b99acca7f69196 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 15:12:37 +0100
Subject: [PATC
@@ -1125,6 +1130,10 @@ Register SparcTargetLowering::getRegisterByName(const
char* RegName, LLT VT,
.Case("g4", SP::G4).Case("g5", SP::G5).Case("g6", SP::G6).Case("g7",
SP::G7)
.Default(0);
+ const SparcRegisterInfo *TRI = Subtarget->getRegisterInfo();
+ if (!TRI->
https://github.com/spaits updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76580
From a19329050600d4d89cc698b686d7aaa13e0c22c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gabor Spaits
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 17:54:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 01/19] [analyzer] Add std::any checker
---
clang/docs/analyzer/chec
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77637
The test checks that objects in arrays are destructed in reverse order during
stack unwinding.
>From 545ee4900e48b186e1c9fff93dc62a459ee19754 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 10 Jan
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll)
Changes
The test checks that objects in arrays are destructed in reverse order during
stack unwinding.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77637.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (added) clang/t
Author: Luke Lau
Date: 2024-01-11T00:37:01+07:00
New Revision: 2c60d59864ed8b2b26c4f0683ee7a1816c6d951e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2c60d59864ed8b2b26c4f0683ee7a1816c6d951e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2c60d59864ed8b2b26c4f0683ee7a1816c6d951e.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/lukel97 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77588
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
-fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors | llvm-cxxfilt -n | FileCheck %s
--check-prefixes CHECK,CXX98
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
-f
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77637
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
The test should also validate the non-catch case! The destruction order is
also relevant for the 'try' block's cleanup as well. So there is probably two
different 'check' sections here that need to happen.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/776
https://github.com/spaits updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76580
From a19329050600d4d89cc698b686d7aaa13e0c22c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gabor Spaits
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 17:54:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 01/20] [analyzer] Add std::any checker
---
clang/docs/analyzer/chec
Endilll wrote:
Our C++ DR test suite has little codegen tests (around 3 or 4, depending on how
you count). This rather simple DR about order of destruction of stack unwinding
aims to establish a precedent for how such test should be written. Specific
points I'd like to highlight:
1. Use of `ll
https://github.com/lukel97 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77645
We have two structs for representing the version of an extension in
RISCVISAInfo, with the exact same fields. This patch deduplicates them.
> [!NOTE]
> When renaming the struct, I also dropped the struct's name f
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-support
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Luke Lau (lukel97)
Changes
We have two structs for representing the version of an extension in
RISCVISAInfo, with the exact same fields. This patch deduplicates them.
> [!NOTE]
> When renaming the struct,
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+//===- StdAnyChecker.cpp -*- C++
-*===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/lukel97 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77645
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/lukel97 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77645
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 14e291000f96c20e35ef494bd407f459b4617fca
916d4f271982501b7236d60b90c9fa822f7aa2a6 --
Endilll wrote:
@erichkeane Defect report reads
> The test should also validate the non-catch case! The destruction order is
> also relevant for the 'try' block's cleanup as well. So there is probably two
> different 'check' sections here that need to happen.
So I think while both your points a
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
-fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors | llvm-cxxfilt -n | FileCheck %s
--check-prefixes CHECK,CXX98
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
-f
https://github.com/lukel97 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77645
>From 916d4f271982501b7236d60b90c9fa822f7aa2a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luke Lau
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:44:19 +0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [RISCV] Deduplicate version struct in RISCVISAInfo. NFC
We have t
https://github.com/MDevereau created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77656
This fixes cvt multi vector builtins that erroneously had inverted return
vectors and vector parameters. This caused the incorrect instructions to be
emitted.
>From 67be98b05d771dabe11af54b69532641fa548fb1 Mo
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-ir
Author: Matthew Devereau (MDevereau)
Changes
This fixes cvt multi vector builtins that erroneously had inverted return
vectors and vector parameters. This caused the incorrect instructions to be
emitted.
---
Patch is 38.88 KiB, truncated to 2
https://github.com/QuietMisdreavus edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77451
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/QuietMisdreavus approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77451
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1267,30 +1271,31 @@ class APISet {
DeclarationFragments Declaration,
DeclarationFragments SubHeading, bool
IsFromSystemHeader);
- /// Create and add a struct field record into the API set.
+ /// Create and add a record field r
erichkeane wrote:
> @erichkeane Defect report reads
>
> > The destruction of fully-constructed array elements when array
> > initialization is terminated by an exception is required by 14.3
> > [[except.ctor](https://wg21.link/except.ctor#2)] paragraph 2, but the order
> > in which they are t
Author: Erich Keane
Date: 2024-01-10T10:26:49-08:00
New Revision: cac6b1a5420d76f4635696372849dbbf07a77376
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cac6b1a5420d76f4635696372849dbbf07a77376
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cac6b1a5420d76f4635696372849dbbf07a77376.diff
L
https://github.com/erichkeane closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77617
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ymand updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77481
>From 34121d09cbb833c6462d516767f14b2cd05db82d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yitzhak Mandelbaum
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 15:36:40 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][dataflow] Make cap on block visits configurable
by
https://github.com/ymand updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76746
>From 3524e2bc42aa6f83a8ecb3ad892d4a7a33f31f03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yitzhak Mandelbaum
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 19:27:21 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][dataflow] Fix bug in `Value` comparison.
Makes valu
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 11ac97c67a9315dce48fd938d68ae991e3559f10
b2a6821ea88f6ed3b38c6dca1e5c7aaeef4159a2 --
@@ -1391,7 +1394,26 @@ class LowerMatrixIntrinsics {
return TTI.getMemoryOpCost(Instruction::Load, VecTy, Align(1), 0) -
N * TTI.getMemoryOpCost(Instruction::Load, EltTy, Align(1), 0);
};
-auto LHSCost = GetCostForArg(LHS, LShape.NumColumns);
+
--
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77537
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77537
>From 8bd31c3cdb6ce41194b063c9ac13e5e2fbfbcc02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fangrui Song
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 14:01:02 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [CMake] Deprecate GCC_INSTALL_PREFIX
Part of https://reviews.llvm
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77637
>From 545ee4900e48b186e1c9fff93dc62a459ee19754 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 20:27:53 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Add test for CWG1807
The test checks that objec
MaskRay wrote:
> Seems okay to me, but it would be good to include an update to the release
> notes, which ideally shows an example of what replacing the cmake flag with a
> config file would look like.
Thanks for the feedback. I have added pseudocode how GCC installation detection
works in t
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77537
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2024-01-10T11:01:55-08:00
New Revision: 3358c77b01fff71c586cc998dd80e06662d9e854
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3358c77b01fff71c586cc998dd80e06662d9e854
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3358c77b01fff71c586cc998dd80e06662d9e854.diff
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77537
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ldionne ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73617
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66963
>From 647f5fe641b30c874bab770fced9fcec9b601161 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zijun Zhao
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:26:01 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] [libc++] Implement ranges::contains_subrange
---
libcxx
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77637
>From 545ee4900e48b186e1c9fff93dc62a459ee19754 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 20:27:53 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Add test for CWG1807
The test checks that objec
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77444
>From 1cbf8eec15112cd6871fcfb69425c62f08c8f681 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 14:17:21 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Add tests for DRs about complete-class context
MI
https://github.com/ldionne ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76447
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ldionne ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66963
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77210
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ldionne ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76449
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-01-10T20:19:04+01:00
New Revision: e80b9436476bba714e843461e03227b222185f7b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e80b9436476bba714e843461e03227b222185f7b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e80b9436476bba714e843461e03227b222185f7b.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77295
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77670
Previously, we've been mentioning tests that were placed in their own files in
corresponding `drNNxx.cpp` file. This patch makes sure we do this consistently,
and improves upon existing practice by specifying th
Endilll wrote:
This PR is created to check it against CI
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77670
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll)
Changes
Previously, we've been mentioning tests that were placed in their own files in
corresponding `drNNxx.cpp` file. This patch makes sure we do this consistently,
and improves upon existing practice by spe
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
-fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors | llvm-cxxfilt -n | FileCheck %s
--check-prefixes CHECK,CXX98
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
-f
https://github.com/wlei-llvm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75092
>From ccfee2d0c5399b03b53ef79a4645ab0d10efeafd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wlei
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 18:30:42 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [PseudoProbe] Mix and reorder block and call probe ID in
lexical or
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77670
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
wlei-llvm wrote:
> > Agreed with this concern. To do this, we probably also need a flag in the
> > binary, because otherwise if we use the new toolchain for prof-gen but the
> > binary built on the old toolchain, we then would generate a profile with
> > this flag on but the order is the old o
kosarev wrote:
It seems after this change we started to fail on `LLVM ::
ExecutionEngine/JITLink/RISCV/ELF_ehframe.s` when using debug libgcxx.
Tagging #68594.
```
/usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_algo.h:2217:
In function:
std::pair<_FIter, _FIter> std::equal_range(_FIter, _FIter, const _Tp&,
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
+//===-- runtime/execute.cpp
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
201 - 300 of 540 matches
Mail list logo
