https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77295
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cor3ntin wrote:
@erichkeane @AaronBallman
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77092
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Balázs Kéri
Date: 2024-01-10T09:09:51+01:00
New Revision: 8f78dd4b92b44c490d263a4d161850853874859d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8f78dd4b92b44c490d263a4d161850853874859d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8f78dd4b92b44c490d263a4d161850853874859d.diff
L
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77331
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
owenca wrote:
Relanded as b53628a52d19. (See
[here](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/42ec976184acd40436acd7104ad715c60ca3e7ed#commitcomment-136674701)).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76733
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commit
Author: Dominik Adamski
Date: 2024-01-10T09:38:58+01:00
New Revision: f443fbc49b8914a8453de61aea741221df9648cf
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f443fbc49b8914a8453de61aea741221df9648cf
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f443fbc49b8914a8453de61aea741221df9648cf.dif
https://github.com/DominikAdamski closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71045
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ set(LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS
Support
TargetParser
FrontendOpenMP
+ FrontendDriver
lukel97 wrote:
I agree. I think I'm coming around to the opinion that this is a bit overkill
just to avoid duplicating 16 lines of code.
I'm also thinking th
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ set(LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS
Support
TargetParser
FrontendOpenMP
+ FrontendDriver
tschuett wrote:
I would prefer putting it into FrontendDriver for style and as a precedence to
encourage others to put more into the frontend.
https://github
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ set(LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS
Support
TargetParser
FrontendOpenMP
+ FrontendDriver
lukel97 wrote:
I think the issue with llvmFrontendDriver specifically is that this code
wouldn't be called from any of the drivers, it would be called from cl
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77509
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-01-10T12:51:04+04:00
New Revision: d0918a20d2a85bad3cd0ec48be4b91e873bfe737
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d0918a20d2a85bad3cd0ec48be4b91e873bfe737
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d0918a20d2a85bad3cd0ec48be4b91e873bfe737.
https://github.com/NorthBlue333 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77456
>From 8081b93a021b24c5310bc9a08d00f0d07f1bbfa1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NorthBlue333
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 14:01:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Do not update cursor pos if no includes
replac
@@ -386,6 +393,11 @@ bool
RISCVTargetInfo::handleTargetFeatures(std::vector &Features,
if (llvm::is_contained(Features, "+experimental"))
HasExperimental = true;
+ if (ABI == "ilp32e" && ISAInfo->hasExtension("d")) {
+Diags.Report(diag::err_invalid_feature_combinat
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusi=CC=81kova=CC=81?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
cor3ntin wrote:
Oups, can you rebase?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77214
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-01-10T00:58:35-08:00
New Revision: c69ec700adec315b3daa55742f2ef655242fa297
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c69ec700adec315b3daa55742f2ef655242fa297
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c69ec700adec315b3daa55742f2ef655242fa297.diff
LOG:
@@ -386,6 +393,11 @@ bool
RISCVTargetInfo::handleTargetFeatures(std::vector &Features,
if (llvm::is_contained(Features, "+experimental"))
HasExperimental = true;
+ if (ABI == "ilp32e" && ISAInfo->hasExtension("d")) {
+Diags.Report(diag::err_invalid_feature_combinat
https://github.com/hanickadot updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77214
From 766df92436569a924ef1c3860b3e1019c2048b53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Hana=20Dusi=CC=81kova=CC=81?=
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:00:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [coverage] fix incorrect coverage rep
carlos4242 wrote:
Sure thing @benshi001 ... I'll create tests. The Swift ABI is documented here:
https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/main/docs/ABI/CallingConvention.rst
I don't think this change will actually change any ABI. All my code uses the
normal avr-gcc ABI you referenced.
I'll work ou
zmodem wrote:
Seems okay to me, but it would be good to include an update to the release
notes, which ideally shows an example of what replacing the cmake flag with a
config file would look like.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77537
___
cf
https://github.com/wangpc-pp edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76777
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NorthBlue333 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77456
>From 04258b4ee42e29ec160b7fa4992dd1ad63db77dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NorthBlue333
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 14:01:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Do not update cursor pos if no includes
replac
NorthBlue333 wrote:
The change is done 👍
Is the code formatting check broken?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77456
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jeanPerier approved this pull request.
Thanks for the updates @yi-wu-arm, LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74077
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
Author: Martin Storsjö
Date: 2024-01-10T11:25:17+02:00
New Revision: be320fdf7ba9a94f6970f433ec1402cdc5cfe6b1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/be320fdf7ba9a94f6970f433ec1402cdc5cfe6b1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/be320fdf7ba9a94f6970f433ec1402cdc5cfe6b1.diff
https://github.com/mstorsjo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77534
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mstorsjo wrote:
> `bool isEABIHF` from clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/ARM.cpp can probably be
> factored.
Yep - any suggestion on where we could move it? Up to the `Triple` class?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77536
___
cfe-commits mailing lis
Author: Martin Storsjö
Date: 2024-01-10T11:27:46+02:00
New Revision: 65a56a29b6ad3d9df43df1c5a1238b1f870f24f9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/65a56a29b6ad3d9df43df1c5a1238b1f870f24f9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/65a56a29b6ad3d9df43df1c5a1238b1f870f24f9.diff
@@ -8900,6 +8900,82 @@ SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerINT_TO_FP(SDValue Op,
return FP;
}
+SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerSET_ROUNDING(SDValue Op,
+ SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
+ SDLoc Dl(Op);
+ MachineFunction &MF = DAG.getMachi
https://github.com/mstorsjo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77536
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ecnelises updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67302
>From a1567f579531c3abbd1f4e9b7c7edd2f95ead42c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qiu Chaofan
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 17:10:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [PowerPC] Implement llvm.set.rounding intrinsic
According to
ecnelises wrote:
> Maybe we can do some perf test between this expansion for set rounding mode
> and the system library's version for fesetround().
They are faster than system `fesetround` on both Linux and AIX. Linux glibc
optimizes `fesetround` with faster `mffscrn` on P9, I just exploited t
https://github.com/NorthBlue333 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77456
>From 18163c8cad017274adaf8c4e23c0121dc1f3c844 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NorthBlue333
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 14:01:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Do not update cursor pos if no includes
replac
owenca wrote:
> The change is done 👍 Is the code formatting check broken?
See
[here](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76059#issuecomment-1865850011).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77456
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@li
@@ -8900,6 +8900,82 @@ SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerINT_TO_FP(SDValue Op,
return FP;
}
+SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerSET_ROUNDING(SDValue Op,
+ SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
+ SDLoc Dl(Op);
+ MachineFunction &MF = DAG.getMachi
https://github.com/jeanPerier approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71222
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
yronglin wrote:
ping~
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76361
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
muneebkhan85 wrote:
@matthias-springer I had to move the pull request
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71555 here due to an erroneous force
push.
I have addressed all the comments you had pointed out in the original review.
Most importantly
1) I have re-written the logic for the co
nikic wrote:
Some IR for reference: https://clang.godbolt.org/z/qEsP7vozW I believe that on
unwind, the sret temporary is either entirely unused (if no cleanup landingpad
is necessary) or we will call lifetime.end on it (which is legal for
dead_on_unwind). This should be independent of whether
martinboehme wrote:
This breaks some internal integration tests. Reverting while we investigate.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77453
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe
https://github.com/martinboehme created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77570
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#77453
>From 038c85ca9733404a67c0f328f268ca0124cf5b17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: martinboehme
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:49:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[clang][dataflow] Ad
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-01-10T10:50:16+01:00
New Revision: 7ce010f2fb01341ab253547324e126d81d47f794
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7ce010f2fb01341ab253547324e126d81d47f794
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7ce010f2fb01341ab253547324e126d81d47f794.diff
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77570
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (martinboehme)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#77453
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77570.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Formula.h (-4)
- (modified) clang
https://github.com/wangpc-pp created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77573
The doc is not correctly rendered with missing blank lines.
>From 2d249aefa1bfa91f41a3866c4203eff041415546 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wangpc
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:54:27 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Wang Pengcheng (wangpc-pp)
Changes
The doc is not correctly rendered with missing blank lines.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77573.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/LanguageExtensions.rst (+2)
Author: Hana Dusíková
Date: 2024-01-10T11:01:23+01:00
New Revision: a26cc759ae5a8018e2c328cf53173992340b995a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a26cc759ae5a8018e2c328cf53173992340b995a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a26cc759ae5a8018e2c328cf53173992340b995a.diff
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77214
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yi-wu-arm closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74077
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
matthias-springer wrote:
Can you re-open the old PR and force-push the contents of this PR to the old
PR? Ideally, we'd keep using the old PR, so that we don't loose the review
comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77328
___
cfe-commit
https://github.com/ecnelises updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67302
>From a1567f579531c3abbd1f4e9b7c7edd2f95ead42c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qiu Chaofan
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 17:10:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [PowerPC] Implement llvm.set.rounding intrinsic
According to
@@ -105,6 +106,161 @@ static void specializeForLoopForUnrolling(ForOp op) {
op.erase();
}
+/// Create a new for loop for the remaining iterations (partialIteration)
+/// after a for loop has been peeled. This is followed by correcting the
+/// loop bounds for both loops give
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 40236257ea9d1e451daee5c0938bd23abd5d1450
df3227d73e03b5d013e14293013e54da120c0b77 --
https://github.com/Pierre-vh edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76955
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/benshi001 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77576
According to https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/, the return
value of 'ftell' is not restricted to > 0, and may return 0 in real world.
And the corresponding unit test also show `Ret >= 0` not `R
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ben Shi (benshi001)
Changes
According to https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/, the return
value of 'ftell' is not restricted to > 0, and may return 0 in real world.
And the corresponding unit test also show `Ret >= 0` not `Re
https://github.com/r4nt updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76245
>From 52cb11f0279dbd9f65f15e81f44869cfac00d544 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Manuel Klimek
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:00:35 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [ClangFormat] Fix formatting bugs.
1. There are multiple calls to
https://github.com/benshi001 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77576
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Pierre-vh updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76954
>From 6368d8210e211948b5a03ab326b996695b8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pvanhout
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:12:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [AMDGPU] Introduce Code Object V6
Introduce Code Object V6 in Clang,
weliveindetail wrote:
Thanks for the quick review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77491
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -105,6 +106,161 @@ static void specializeForLoopForUnrolling(ForOp op) {
op.erase();
}
+/// Create a new for loop for the remaining iterations (partialIteration)
+/// after a for loop has been peeled. This is followed by correcting the
+/// loop bounds for both loops give
Author: Stefan Gränitz
Date: 2024-01-10T11:49:01+01:00
New Revision: 5cc03442d392693d0d2457f571cc8fa1736bfe5e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5cc03442d392693d0d2457f571cc8fa1736bfe5e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5cc03442d392693d0d2457f571cc8fa1736bfe5e.diff
https://github.com/weliveindetail closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77491
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jayfoad closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77470
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1321,12 +1321,17 @@ def SVSET_3_BF16 : SInst<"svset3[_{d}]", "33id", "b",
MergeNone, "", [IsTupleSet
def SVSET_4_BF16 : SInst<"svset4[_{d}]", "44id", "b", MergeNone, "",
[IsTupleSet], [ImmCheck<1, ImmCheck0_3>]>;
}
-let TargetGuard = "sve2p1" in {
- def SVGET_2_B : SIns
NorthBlue333 wrote:
Currently fixing the tests.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77456
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
john-brawn-arm wrote:
Ping.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75486
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/benshi001 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77580
None
>From cb79cad6837dba5d33476c65923ec714507a3fef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Shi
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 19:00:27 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][analyzer] Support 'tello' and 'fseeko' in the
StreamCh
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Ben Shi (benshi001)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77580.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StreamChecker.cpp (+4)
- (modified) clang/test/Analysis
@@ -105,6 +106,161 @@ static void specializeForLoopForUnrolling(ForOp op) {
op.erase();
}
+/// Create a new for loop for the remaining iterations (partialIteration)
+/// after a for loop has been peeled. This is followed by correcting the
+/// loop bounds for both loops give
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Amirreza Ashouri (AMP999)
Changes
---
Patch is 188.49 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77584.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/test/SemaCXX/type-traits.cpp (+1672-1683
https://github.com/11happy created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77586
**Overview:**
This pull request fixes #38469 where the issue proposes a new static analysis
check in C++ to discourage the explicit return 0; statement at the end of the
main() function. As C++ automatically ass
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Bhuminjay Soni (11happy)
Changes
**Overview:**
This pull request fixes #38469 where the issue proposes a new static
analysis check in C++ to discourage the explicit return 0; statement at the end
of the main() function. As C++ automa
https://github.com/11happy updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77586
>From bae95013cd7f937a5496cafcd40a77cc563addb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: 11happy
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:48:43 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Added check for redundant return statement
Signed-off-by: 11happy
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 8f78dd4b92b44c490d263a4d161850853874859d
bae95013cd7f937a5496cafcd40a77cc563addb0 --
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77587
Fixes: #77583
bcd51aaaf8bde4b0ae7a4155d9ce3dec78fe2598 fixed part of template instantiation
dependent name issues but still missing some cases This patch want to enhance
the dependent name check
>From f6b9a
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Congcong Cai (HerrCai0907)
Changes
Fixes: #77583
bcd51aaaf8bde4b0ae7a4155d9ce3dec78fe2598 fixed part of template instantiation
dependent name issues but still missing some cases This patch want to enhance
the dependent name check
---
Ful
https://github.com/lukel97 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77588
This patch adds support for the -mrvv-vector-bits flag in the Flang driver, and
translates them to -mvscale-min/-mvscale-max.
The code was copied from the Clang toolchain (similarly to what was done for
AArch64's
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-driver
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Luke Lau (lukel97)
Changes
This patch adds support for the -mrvv-vector-bits flag in the Flang driver, and
translates them to -mvscale-min/-mvscale-max.
The code was copied from the Clang toolchain (simila
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ void test_svmla_single4_u16(uint32_t slice_base,
svuint16x4_t zn, svuint16_t zm)
//
void test_svmla_single4_s16(uint32_t slice_base, svint16x4_t zn, svint16_t zm)
__arm_streaming __arm_shared_za
{
- SVE_ACLE_FUNC(svmla_single_za32,,_s16,,_vg2x4)(slice_ba
https://github.com/MDevereau edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76711
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MDevereau edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76711
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AMP999 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77584
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MDevereau updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76711
>From 908da224bd01e4758392a98ba2191185d7296c6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Devereau
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 11:36:33 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [AArch64][SME2] Fix SME2 mla/mls tests
The ACLE defines the
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+//===--- DonotreturnzerocheckCheck.h - clang-tidy ---*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+//===--- DonotreturnzerocheckCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+//===--- DonotreturnzerocheckCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+//===--- DonotreturnzerocheckCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ void test_svmla_single4_u16(uint32_t slice_base,
svuint16x4_t zn, svuint16_t zm)
//
void test_svmla_single4_s16(uint32_t slice_base, svint16x4_t zn, svint16_t zm)
__arm_streaming __arm_shared_za
{
- SVE_ACLE_FUNC(svmla_single_za32,,_s16,,_vg2x4)(slice_ba
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ void test_svmls_lane1_f16(uint32_t slice_base, svfloat16_t
zn, svfloat16_t zm) _
//
void test_svmls_lane1_bf16(uint32_t slice_base, svbfloat16_t zn, svbfloat16_t
zm) __arm_streaming __arm_shared_za
{
- SVE_ACLE_FUNC(svmls_lane_za32,,_bf16,,_vg2x1)(slice_
mariusz-sikora-at-amd wrote:
ping @arsenm
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76212
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
dtemirbulatov wrote:
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77097
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/luporl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77365
>From 01a2a8d315af2edb9fe3f0c9b57b5c74935521f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leandro Lupori
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 16:37:54 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [flang][driver] Add support for -isysroot in the frontend
If
luporl wrote:
Thanks for the review and all the suggestions!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77365
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AMP999 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77092
>From 5d8204ef66bea614d614b5c16a2ddf765402f710 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amirreza Ashouri
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:23:14 +0330
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Fix behavior of __is_trivially_relocatable(volatile
int
https://github.com/dtemirbulatov approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77097
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
luporl wrote:
I guess I was so focused on testing executables on Darwin that I forgot this
test also applies to other targets.
Let's hope it doesn't introduce a failure on any target.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77365
https://github.com/PiotrZSL requested changes to this pull request.
I'm not fan about this check. For me there is no use case for it.
For sure it's not readability, simply because explicit return is more readable,
and people who do not know that main by default will return 0 may even consider
t
https://github.com/d0k approved this pull request.
I don't know anything about Emacs, but if the version field is required I see
no harm in adding it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76110
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.
Author: darkfeline
Date: 2024-01-10T13:14:21+01:00
New Revision: 5b4abae7630572c96a736faa1f09b1a3c37201a2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5b4abae7630572c96a736faa1f09b1a3c37201a2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5b4abae7630572c96a736faa1f09b1a3c37201a2.diff
LO
1 - 100 of 540 matches
Mail list logo
