HaohaiWen wrote:
Refer https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76921 for failure output
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76933
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
https://github.com/yetingk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68075
>From be70878169742f7e9cbb276a05254019c586897b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yeting Kuo
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 16:08:06 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [RISCV] Implement shadow stack on shadow stack mode with
Zicfiss
https://github.com/daltairwalter updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70621
>From f44d7746a990a3bd8e53de047a30baee4da2c790 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Walter
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 00:08:56 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] Initial commit of add new check before changes
---
..
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+; RUN: llc --verify-machineinstrs < %s
+source_filename = "test.cpp"
+target datalayout =
"e-m:w-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
+target triple = "x86_64-pc-windows-msvc19.12.0"
+
+$"?test@Test@@Plugin@@Host@@@Z" = comd
@@ -57,11 +57,12 @@ compiled application or the operating system. Integrating
the runtime into
the operating system should be preferred since otherwise all thread creation
and destruction would need to be intercepted by the application.
-The instrumentation makes use of the p
https://github.com/lukel97 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76942
>From caa25a73dd69268490c89d5e9e91b8d545bce760 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luke Lau
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:02:39 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [RISCV] Deduplicate
RISCVISAInfo::toFeatures/toFeatureVector. NFC
@@ -42,9 +42,10 @@ static bool getArchFeatures(const Driver &D, StringRef Arch,
return false;
}
- (*ISAInfo)->toFeatures(
- Features, [&Args](const Twine &Str) { return Args.MakeArgString(Str); },
- /*AddAllExtensions=*/true);
+ const auto ISAInfoFeatures = (
https://github.com/heiher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72078
>From e3863873ab817dacf8680763bb42d91f005fe5ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: WANG Rui
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 21:07:48 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [clang] Add per-global code model attribute
This patch adds a pe
@@ -22,10 +22,7 @@ define void @add(ptr %pa, ptr %pb, ptr %pc) nounwind {
; X86-NEXT:vaddss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
; X86-NEXT:vmovss %xmm0, (%esp)
; X86-NEXT:calll __truncsfbf2
-; X86-NEXT:fstps {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
-; X86-NEXT:vmovd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = mem[0],zero,zer
@@ -3369,6 +3369,36 @@ static void handleSectionAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D, const
ParsedAttr &AL) {
}
}
+static void handleCodeModelAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D, const ParsedAttr &AL) {
+ StringRef CM;
+ StringRef Str;
+ SourceLocation LiteralLoc;
+ bool Ok = false;
+ // Check tha
@@ -22,10 +22,7 @@ define void @add(ptr %pa, ptr %pb, ptr %pc) nounwind {
; X86-NEXT:vaddss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
; X86-NEXT:vmovss %xmm0, (%esp)
; X86-NEXT:calll __truncsfbf2
-; X86-NEXT:fstps {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
-; X86-NEXT:vmovd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = mem[0],zero,zer
Luhaocong wrote:
> LGTM.
>
> The format diagnostics are new in Clang 18 and as such we do not need a
> release note. Correct?
This format diagnostics is existent until
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/04e6178ae932c9a1d939dcfe3ef1189f4bbb21aa
had been committed. Clang 17.0.1 gives
@@ -22,10 +22,7 @@ define void @add(ptr %pa, ptr %pb, ptr %pc) nounwind {
; X86-NEXT:vaddss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
; X86-NEXT:vmovss %xmm0, (%esp)
; X86-NEXT:calll __truncsfbf2
-; X86-NEXT:fstps {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
-; X86-NEXT:vmovd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = mem[0],zero,zer
SuperSodaSea wrote:
Problem solved :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68485
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/phoebewang edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76901
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yetingk edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68075
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/FreddyLeaf approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76901
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -22,10 +22,7 @@ define void @add(ptr %pa, ptr %pb, ptr %pc) nounwind {
; X86-NEXT:vaddss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
; X86-NEXT:vmovss %xmm0, (%esp)
; X86-NEXT:calll __truncsfbf2
-; X86-NEXT:fstps {{[0-9]+}}(%esp)
-; X86-NEXT:vmovd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = mem[0],zero,zer
koute wrote:
Side note: shouldn't we also update `compiler-rt/lib/builtins/riscv/{save,
restore}.S`? E.g. with something like this:
```patch
diff --git a/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/riscv/restore.S
b/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/riscv/restore.S
index 73f64a920d66..2e185ecae3f7 100644
--- a/compiler-r
phoebewang wrote:
Thanks @FreddyLeaf !
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76901
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/phoebewang closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76901
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -586,6 +586,16 @@ void swap(int&, int&) {
throw 1;
}
+void iter_swap(int&, int&) {
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:6: warning: an exception may be thrown in
function 'iter_swap' which should not throw exceptions
+ throw 1;
+}
+
+void iter_move(int&, int&) {
-
wangpc-pp wrote:
> Side note: shouldn't we also update `compiler-rt/lib/builtins/riscv/{save,
> restore}.S`? E.g. with something like this:
> [...]
> (I don't remember why exactly since I did it a long time ago, but for some
> reason I do have this patch in my LLVM fork, so it probably was nec
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
Thanks for confirming.
Do you need me to merge that for you?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74439
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/
cor3ntin wrote:
Can you provide a more complete description of your change, a better title?
Does this change needs tests? A release note?
Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77031
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ht
@@ -7671,9 +7671,12 @@ The ``[[clang::coro_lifetimebound]]`` is a class
attribute which can be applied
to a coroutine return type (`CRT`_) (i.e.
it should also be annotated with ``[[clang::coro_return_type]]``).
-All parameters of a function are considered to be lifetime boun
https://github.com/kadircet updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76795
From 18ef1d8901835f5129f775d292425b808f42fe85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kadir Cetinkaya
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 09:28:35 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-format] Break after string literals with trailing
li
kadircet wrote:
ping @HazardyKnusperkeks @owenca this is blocking releases on our side,
anything concerning here?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76795
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
zyn0217 wrote:
Just get back to this again. So, I have explored the other case and found it
particular to explicit template arguments. In fact, we could slightly revise
the motivating case to
```cpp
template
concept C = false;
template typename T>
int wow(T ts);
template struct S {};
int
Luhaocong wrote:
> Thanks for confirming. Do you need me to merge that for you?
It can't be better, thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74439
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
koute wrote:
> As for your diffs, it seems that you only handle the
> `__riscv_save/restore_[2|1|0]`, which is incomplete. And the code is not
> different with non-rve cases?
Yes, I mostly copy-pasted the existing code and removed all of the code dealing
with registers not available on RV32E,
@@ -291,13 +307,63 @@ OpenACCDirectiveKind ParseOpenACCDirectiveKind(Parser &P)
{
return DirKind;
}
+bool ClauseHasRequiredParens(OpenACCClauseKind Kind) {
+ return Kind == OpenACCClauseKind::Default;
+}
+
+bool ParseOpenACCClauseParams(Parser &P, OpenACCClauseKind Kind) {
@@ -345,15 +345,19 @@ MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList
Sema::getTemplateInstantiationArgs(
using namespace TemplateInstArgsHelpers;
const Decl *CurDecl = ND;
+
+ if (!ND)
zyn0217 wrote:
> Can we also get a comment here why this makes sense to call
> `Dec
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76811
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
501 - 534 of 534 matches
Mail list logo
