llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
Author: Wang Pengcheng (wangpc-pp)
Changes
We can reduce some code.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74280.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/RISCV.cpp (+2-7)
``diff
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74279
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
xiangzh1 wrote:
> We should add TTI check for the condition. I believe don't unroll on X86 is a
> correct decision. Only like AMDGPU or NVPTX these GPU backend with heavy
> stack cost need this.
>
> And I think you need to precommit tests first.
In fact, there is no direct/strong relation wit
JOE1994 wrote:
I've been using `git clang-format` without the `--bin` flag using the following
setting
1. `PATH=$PATH:~/llvm-project/build/bin:~/llvm-project/clang/tools/clang-format`
2. Run `git clang-format HEAD~1` at `~/llvm-project` directory
After this revision, I get the following error:
https://github.com/KanRobert updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74199
>From 246d6e2bc3f6fb60623b5d4c3f07b53c628ed88a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shengchen Kan
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 23:52:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [X86] Support CFE flags for APX features
Positive options:
@@ -139,12 +139,36 @@ SmallVector
getValuesSortedByKey(ArrayRef keys, ArrayRef values,
llvm::function_ref compare);
+/// Helper function to check whether the passed in `sizes` or `values` are
Lewuathe wrote:
```suggestion
/// Helper funct
https://github.com/Lewuathe edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74200
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -139,12 +139,36 @@ SmallVector
getValuesSortedByKey(ArrayRef keys, ArrayRef values,
llvm::function_ref compare);
+/// Helper function to check whether the passed in `sizes` or `values` are
+/// valid. This can be used to re-check whether dimensions are
https://github.com/Lewuathe commented:
Is it possible to add the test case (or minimal similar example) with
`--inline` option so that we can confirm the original issue is resolved.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/73383
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74200
__
bcl5980 wrote:
> > We should add TTI check for the condition. I believe don't unroll on X86 is
> > a correct decision. Only like AMDGPU or NVPTX these GPU backend with heavy
> > stack cost need this.
> > And I think you need to precommit tests first.
>
> In fact, there is no direct/strong rela
vikramRH wrote:
> Is there a separate PR open for "Add vector processing support to AMDGPU
> printf"? I think it's easiest to move this part forward first
@arsenm , you are right. I just want to make sure we are good on runtime
changes too now since there seems to be a blocker. The changes her
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Brandon Wu (4vtomat)
Changes
The
spec(https://sifive.cdn.prismic.io/sifive/60d5a660-3af0-49a3-a904-d2bbb1a21517_int8-matmul-spec.pdf)
is updated.
---
Patch is 121.79 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
Author: Brandon Wu (4vtomat)
Changes
The
spec(https://sifive.cdn.prismic.io/sifive/60d5a660-3af0-49a3-a904-d2bbb1a21517_int8-matmul-spec.pdf)
is updated.
---
Patch is 121.79 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://gi
https://github.com/owenca updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74235
>From 7323d9261fe8c876fe3a656a98e186af3dd0b2a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 01:41:57 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-format] Remove duplicates in @property using
std::set
Re-im
https://github.com/rikhuijzer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74200
>From 22928e7e5da508d8d9dc8d4b7e54f84cccadef06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rik Huijzer
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 09:02:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [mlir][tensor] Fix canon via `hasNegativeDimension`
---
ml
@@ -298,3 +298,11 @@ multiclass ZAAddSub {
defm SVADD : ZAAddSub<"add">;
defm SVSUB : ZAAddSub<"sub">;
+
+//
+// Spill and fill of ZT0
+//
+let TargetGuard = "sme2" in {
+ def SVLDR_ZT : Inst<"svldr_zt", "viQ", "", MergeNone, "aarch64_sme_ldr_zt",
[IsOverloadNone, IsStreamin
@@ -5999,6 +5999,12 @@ def mno_gather : Flag<["-"], "mno-gather">,
Group,
HelpText<"Disable generation of gather instructions in
auto-vectorization(x86 only)">;
def mno_scatter : Flag<["-"], "mno-scatter">, Group,
HelpText<"Disable generatio
@@ -927,6 +939,16 @@ void X86TargetInfo::getTargetDefines(const LangOptions
&Opts,
Builder.defineMacro("__USERMSR__");
if (HasCRC32)
Builder.defineMacro("__CRC32__");
+ if (HasEGPR)
+Builder.defineMacro("__EGPR__");
+ if (HasPush2Pop2)
+Builder.defineMacro(
https://github.com/KanRobert edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74199
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5999,6 +5999,12 @@ def mno_gather : Flag<["-"], "mno-gather">,
Group,
HelpText<"Disable generation of gather instructions in
auto-vectorization(x86 only)">;
def mno_scatter : Flag<["-"], "mno-scatter">, Group,
HelpText<"Disable generatio
@@ -422,3 +422,28 @@
// RUN: touch %t.o
// RUN: %clang -fdriver-only -Werror --target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
-mharden-sls=all %t.o -o /dev/null 2>&1 | count 0
+// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -mapxf %s -### -o %t.o 2>&1 |
FileCheck -check-prefix=APXF %s
+// RUN:
@@ -422,3 +422,28 @@
// RUN: touch %t.o
// RUN: %clang -fdriver-only -Werror --target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
-mharden-sls=all %t.o -o /dev/null 2>&1 | count 0
+// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -mapxf %s -### -o %t.o 2>&1 |
FileCheck -check-prefix=APXF %s
https://github.com/KanRobert updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74199
>From 246d6e2bc3f6fb60623b5d4c3f07b53c628ed88a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shengchen Kan
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 23:52:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [X86] Support CFE flags for APX features
Positive options:
https://github.com/rikhuijzer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74200
>From 22928e7e5da508d8d9dc8d4b7e54f84cccadef06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rik Huijzer
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 09:02:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [mlir][tensor] Fix canon via `hasNegativeDimension`
---
ml
@@ -5999,6 +5999,12 @@ def mno_gather : Flag<["-"], "mno-gather">,
Group,
HelpText<"Disable generation of gather instructions in
auto-vectorization(x86 only)">;
def mno_scatter : Flag<["-"], "mno-scatter">, Group,
HelpText<"Disable generatio
rikhuijzer wrote:
> Is it possible to add the test case (or minimal similar example) with
> `--inline` option so that we can confirm the original issue is resolved.
>
> #73383
Thanks for the review and fixing the typos that I've made! I've added a test in
a new `MemRef/inlining.mlir` file, wh
@@ -927,6 +939,16 @@ void X86TargetInfo::getTargetDefines(const LangOptions
&Opts,
Builder.defineMacro("__USERMSR__");
if (HasCRC32)
Builder.defineMacro("__CRC32__");
+ if (HasEGPR)
+Builder.defineMacro("__EGPR__");
+ if (HasPush2Pop2)
+Builder.defineMacro(
https://github.com/KanRobert updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74199
>From 246d6e2bc3f6fb60623b5d4c3f07b53c628ed88a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shengchen Kan
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 23:52:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [X86] Support CFE flags for APX features
Positive options:
@@ -367,3 +394,14 @@ clang::dataflow::FieldSet
clang::dataflow::getObjectFields(QualType Type) {
getFieldsFromClassHierarchy(Type, Fields);
return Fields;
}
+
+bool clang::dataflow::containsSameFields(
+const clang::dataflow::FieldSet &Fields,
+const clang::dataflo
101 - 129 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
