https://github.com/eopXD edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67018
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/eopXD edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67018
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kasuga-fj wrote:
Thank you for your review! Here are some comments and my thoughts.
> Note that you should probably rebase your patch onto main and force-push to
> update the PR
Does it mean that I can rebase and force-push since (it should be avoided in
normal case but) this is a special cas
@@ -156,10 +156,11 @@ define void @storesTIInit(double %Val) #0 {
; SMALL32: # %bb.0: # %entry
; SMALL32-NEXT:mflr 0
; SMALL32-NEXT:stwu 1, -32(1)
-; SMALL32-NEXT:lwz 3, L..C4(2) # target-flags(ppc-lo) @TIInit
-; SMALL32-NEXT:lwz 4, L..C5(2) # target-flags
https://github.com/eopXD created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67089
`isRVVSizelessBuiltinType` and `isRVVType` has the same functionality. This
commit removes the former since we have more variants available in `isRVVType`.
>From 483240e16d800e52783dcfaf52eae81fb1dfca7c Mon Sep 17
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Changes
`isRVVSizelessBuiltinType` and `isRVVType` has the same functionality. This
commit removes the former since we have more variants available in `isRVVType`.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67089.diff
5 Files Affec
@@ -463,3 +463,38 @@ static_assert(bit_cast(ld539) ==
fivehundredandthirtynine, "");
static_assert(round_trip<__int128_t>(34.0L));
#endif
}
+
+namespace test_vector {
+
+typedef unsigned uint2 __attribute__((vector_size(2 * sizeof(unsigned;
+typedef char byte8 __attribute_
phosek added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/UEFI.cpp:58-59
+
+ // Other UEFI binary subsystems that are currently unsupported:
+ // efi_boot_service_driver, efi_rom, efi_runtime_driver.
+ CmdArgs.push_back("-subsystem:efi_application");
--
phosek added a comment.
Is it possible to abandon this change?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D152206/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D152206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.ll
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ set(ENABLE_LINKER_BUILD_ID ON CACHE BOOL "")
set(ENABLE_X86_RELAX_RELOCATIONS ON CACHE BOOL "")
set(CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE Release CACHE STRING "")
+set(CMAKE_CXX_VISIBILITY_PRESET default CACHE STRING "")
petrhosek wrote:
Should we also set `CMAK
401 - 410 of 410 matches
Mail list logo