rsmith added a comment.
Looks good. Can you add a test to `test/CXX/drs/dr23xx.cpp` with a suitable
`dr2386: 10` comment to track that we've implemented DR2386 in Clang 10, please?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66040/new/
https://r
Charusso updated this revision to Diff 214490.
Charusso added a comment.
- Remove one misleading 'no-warning' comment.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042
Files:
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/ClangTidy.cpp
clang/include/clang/Driv
jcai19 updated this revision to Diff 214491.
jcai19 added a comment.
Lower the intrinsic to pseudo instructions directly, instead of SelectDAG nodes
first.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65019/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65019
F
jcai19 marked 4 inline comments as done.
jcai19 added a comment.
@efriedma I have changed my implementation to lower llvm.gnu.eabi.mcount
intrinsic into pseudo instructions directly, instead of first lowering them
into SelectionDAG call nodes. Thanks.
Comment at: llvm/lib/Tar
jcai19 updated this revision to Diff 214496.
jcai19 marked 2 inline comments as done.
jcai19 added a comment.
clang-format the patch.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65019/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65019
Files:
clang/lib/Basic
NoQ added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/Checkers.td:561
+CmdLineOption `Show` -> `Enable`?
> **recursion**, //n.,// see "recursion"
I think it's valuable when the object and the documentation describe the same
idea in //different//
NoQ updated this revision to Diff 214495.
NoQ marked 3 inline comments as done.
NoQ added a comment.
Fix un-singed options.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65182/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65182
Files:
clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/Checkers.td
clang/
NoQ added reviewers: alexfh, Szelethus.
NoQ added a subscriber: alexfh.
NoQ added a comment.
+@alexfh because clang-tidy now finally has a way of safely disabling core
checkers without causing crashes all over the place! Would you like to take the
same approach as we picked in scan-build, i.e. w
Charusso accepted this revision.
Charusso added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend/AnalysisConsumer.cpp:103
void enableWerror() { ShouldEmitAsError = true; }
+ void enableFixitsAsRemarks() { FixitsAsRemarks = true; }
NoQ wrote:
>
Charusso added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Driver/CC1Options.td:127-128
+def analyzer_disable_warning : Separate<["-"], "analyzer-disable-warning">,
+ HelpText<"Choose analyzer checkers of the warnings to disable">;
+def analyzer_disable_warning_EQ : Joine
Charusso updated this revision to Diff 214498.
Charusso marked 5 inline comments as done.
Charusso added a comment.
- Fix.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042
Files:
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/ClangTidy.cpp
clang/include/clang/
Charusso updated this revision to Diff 214500.
Charusso added a comment.
- Fix a comment.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042
Files:
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/ClangTidy.cpp
clang/include/clang/Driver/CC1Options.td
clang/incl
NoQ added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporterVisitors.cpp:1750
+ // [B1] -> [B2] -> [B3] -> [sink]
+ // assert(A && B || C);\ \ \
+ // ---> [go on with the executi
NoQ added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/AnalyzerOptions.h:192-197
+ /// Pair of checker name and enable/disable to do analysis.
+ std::vector> CheckerAnalysisVector;
+
+ /// Vector of checker names to do not emit warnings.
+ std::vector
NoQ accepted this revision.
NoQ added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
But i definitely like it how smooth this patch turned out to be!
Also recent bugzilla requests for this feature:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42816
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418
NoQ added a reviewer: NoQ.
NoQ added a comment.
I like where this is going! I'll add myself so that not to forget to review the
CFG bits next week.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66045/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66045
__
Charusso added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/AnalyzerOptions.h:192-197
+ /// Pair of checker name and enable/disable to do analysis.
+ std::vector> CheckerAnalysisVector;
+
+ /// Vector of checker names to do not emit warnings.
+ std::ve
Jeroen added a comment.
In the reproduction of https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33236 there is
explicit mentioning of `const T`. It would be nice if the test cases for this
fix would also have coverage for that.
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/dcl.decl/dcl.decomp/p3.cpp:15
t
201 - 218 of 218 matches
Mail list logo