madsravn added a comment.
Just curious, as I'm sort of new to this. How long will it take before its
merged in?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20365
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
Prazek added a subscriber: Prazek.
Prazek added a comment.
You have to push it by yourself. It's ain't fun if someone do it for you :D
You have to obtain commit access
http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#obtaining-commit-access and then push
it (you can also find in docs how to do it)
Tha
madsravn added a comment.
@Prazek thanks. I will look into it :)
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20365
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
madsravn created this revision.
madsravn added reviewers: alexfh, flx.
madsravn added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
This is fix for bug 27802: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27802
I have added a check to clang-tidy which refrains from putting parantheses
around macros which are variadic.
ht
ogoffart created this revision.
ogoffart added reviewers: cfe-commits, rsmith.
It is only a crash if the compiler optimize for this!=nullptr because
LocalInstantiationScope::getPartiallySubstitutedPack checks if 'this' is null.
(This is crashing when clang is compiled with GCC6)
http://review
twoh added a comment.
Hmm, yes it seems not so simple to move the call to another place. If I come up
with a better idea I'll submit it as a separate patch, as I don't want to block
this one. Thank you for your work, @faisalv!
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19783
_
madsravn created this revision.
madsravn added reviewers: alexfh, flx.
madsravn added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
Patch for bug 27475: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27475
I used the suggestion of alexfh to check the header extension.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20512
Files:
clang-tidy/llv
Author: rksimon
Date: Sat May 21 16:14:35 2016
New Revision: 270330
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=270330&view=rev
Log:
[X86][AVX] Ensure zero-extension of _mm256_extract_epi8 and _mm256_extract_epi16
Ensure _mm256_extract_epi8 and _mm256_extract_epi16 zero extend their i8/i16
resu
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL270330: [X86][AVX] Ensure zero-extension of
_mm256_extract_epi8 and _mm256_extract_epi16 (authored by RKSimon).
Changed prior to commit:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20468?vs=57927&id=58045#toc
Repository:
kerberizer added a comment.
Dmitry, for a few days now I'm seeing another regression test failure. It has
most likely appeared in the 6 hours frame after r269852, because that's the
period of my automatic builds, and r269852 was the last to pass the tests
successfully. The failure this time is
Author: compnerd
Date: Sat May 21 20:37:36 2016
New Revision: 270351
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=270351&view=rev
Log:
Driver: simplify getDynameLinker
Convert the cascading if/else to a switch. This makes it easier to follow the
logic. Minor difference is that we no longer defa
Author: compnerd
Date: Sat May 21 22:12:19 2016
New Revision: 270352
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=270352&view=rev
Log:
Driver: sink getLinuxDynamicLoader into the Toolchain
The parameter already requires the toolchain, sink the method into the class.
This also enables the use of t
Author: majnemer
Date: Sun May 22 00:34:26 2016
New Revision: 270353
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=270353&view=rev
Log:
[AST] Cleanup comments regarding CXXRecordDecl::isEmpty
We were missing references to the standard, some of our home-grown
verbiage didn't make any sense.
No fun
13 matches
Mail list logo
