r310674. Thanks!
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> Seems reasonable to me.
>
> On 10 August 2017 at 14:28, Hans Wennborg via cfe-commits
> wrote:
>>
>> Should we merge this to 5.0?
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Alexander Kornienko via cfe-commits
>> wrote:
>> > Au
Seems reasonable to me.
On 10 August 2017 at 14:28, Hans Wennborg via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Should we merge this to 5.0?
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Alexander Kornienko via cfe-commits
> wrote:
> > Author: alexfh
> > Date: Mon Jul 31 08:21:26 2017
> > New Re
Should we merge this to 5.0?
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Alexander Kornienko via cfe-commits
wrote:
> Author: alexfh
> Date: Mon Jul 31 08:21:26 2017
> New Revision: 309569
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=309569&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix -Wshadow false positives with function-lo
Author: alexfh
Date: Mon Jul 31 08:21:26 2017
New Revision: 309569
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=309569&view=rev
Log:
Fix -Wshadow false positives with function-local classes.
Summary:
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR33947.
https://godbolt.org/g/54XRMT
void f(int a) {
struct A {
vo
