Re: r278763 - PR28978: If we need overload resolution for the move constructor of an

2016-08-16 Thread Hans Wennborg via cfe-commits
r278817. Many thanks. On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > Hi Hans, Eric Fiselier requested that we fix this bug for 3.9 (it affects > libc++'s std::optional implementation), so this would be a good candidate > for the branch. > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Richard Smith

Re: r278763 - PR28978: If we need overload resolution for the move constructor of an

2016-08-15 Thread Richard Smith via cfe-commits
Hi Hans, Eric Fiselier requested that we fix this bug for 3.9 (it affects libc++'s std::optional implementation), so this would be a good candidate for the branch. On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Richard Smith via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Author: rsmith > Date: Mon Aug

r278763 - PR28978: If we need overload resolution for the move constructor of an

2016-08-15 Thread Richard Smith via cfe-commits
Author: rsmith Date: Mon Aug 15 19:13:47 2016 New Revision: 278763 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=278763&view=rev Log: PR28978: If we need overload resolution for the move constructor of an anonymous union member of a class, we need overload resolution for the move constructor of the