is possible at all.
>
> Thanks again,
> Samuel
>
>
> - Original message -
> From: Hans Wennborg
> Sent by: hwennb...@google.com
> To: Samuel F Antao/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: Mike Aizatsky , cfe-commits
> , "Bataev, Alexey"
> Subject: Re: r276977 - [O
ng any> non-portable code pattern here.>> Alexey, do you have a easy way to test this? Can you give me a little help> here?>> Thanks!> Samuel>>> - Original message -> From: Hans Wennborg > Sent by: hwennb...@google.com> To: Samuel F Antao/Watson/IBM@
y bot message
>> complaining
>> about that code.
>>
>> Do you still see the issues?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Samuel
>>
>>
>> - Original message -
>> From: Mike Aizatsky
>> To: Samuel F Antao/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, cfe-commits@lis
shortly after> I pushed the patch. After that I didn't receive any bot message complaining> about that code.>> Do you still see the issues?>> Thanks,> Samuel>>> - Original message -> From: Mike Aizatsky > To: Samuel F Antao/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, cfe-commits
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: r276977 - [OpenMP] Codegen for use_device_ptr clause.
> Date: Thu, Jul 28, 2016 4:20 PM
>
> Samuel,
>
> I think your change breaks the build:
>
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-windows/builds/26397
>
> F
Hi Mike,
I've already pushed r276981 and r276988 to fix those failures shortly after I pushed the patch. After that I didn't receive any bot message complaining about that code.
Do you still see the issues?
Thanks,
Samuel
- Original message -From: Mike Aizatsky To: Samuel F Antao/W
Author: sfantao
Date: Thu Jul 28 09:23:26 2016
New Revision: 276977
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=276977&view=rev
Log:
[OpenMP] Codegen for use_device_ptr clause.
Summary: This patch adds support for the use_device_ptr clause. It includes
changes in SEMA that could not be tested w
