On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Reid Kleckner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:35 AM, David Blaikie
> wrote:
>>
>> I believe so, but don't have specific numbers. Alexey made this choice
>> when it was originally implemented & I believe had the data back then.
>>
>
> I don't think we made an
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:35 AM, David Blaikie wrote:
>
> I believe so, but don't have specific numbers. Alexey made this choice
> when it was originally implemented & I believe had the data back then.
>
I don't think we made an explicit choice to use short names. gdb and
addr2line just give you
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Nico Weber wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 3:57 PM, David Blaikie via cfe-commits <
> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Reid Kleckner wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 3:45 PM, David Blaikie
>>> wrote:
>>>
Yeah
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 3:57 PM, David Blaikie via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Reid Kleckner wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 3:45 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah - is this necessary for CodeView? (does something break, or do you
>
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Reid Kleckner wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 3:45 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
>
>> Yeah - is this necessary for CodeView? (does something break, or do you
>> just get simple names where you'd prefer full mangled or qualified names)
>>
>> It was chosen pretty deliber
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 3:45 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
> Yeah - is this necessary for CodeView? (does something break, or do you
> just get simple names where you'd prefer full mangled or qualified names)
>
> It was chosen pretty deliberately to do it this way (use unqualified
> names) for gmlt to
Yeah - is this necessary for CodeView? (does something break, or do you
just get simple names where you'd prefer full mangled or qualified names)
It was chosen pretty deliberately to do it this way (use unqualified names)
for gmlt to keep size down. Have you got numbers for the size delta for
Code
Reid
Kleckner via cfe-commits
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 11:06 AM
To: cfe-commits; David Blaikie; Robinson, Paul
Subject: Re: r274246 - [codeview] Emit qualified display names if
-gline-tables-only is on
David and Paul,
Do you think I should enable this behavior for DWARF as well? We on
David and Paul,
Do you think I should enable this behavior for DWARF as well? We only emit
a DW_TAG_subprogram when a function is inlined or contains inlined
functions, which might not be that many. IIRC Paul did something similar
with DW_AT_linkage_name, and the object file size cost wasn't that
Author: rnk
Date: Thu Jun 30 12:41:31 2016
New Revision: 274246
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=274246&view=rev
Log:
[codeview] Emit qualified display names if -gline-tables-only is on
When -gmlt is on, we don't emit namespace or class scope information,
and the CodeView emission cod
10 matches
Mail list logo
