Probably not (unless someone corrects me). In that case, it can wait
for the next release.
Thanks,
Hans
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Aaron Ballman wrote:
> Is PR25804 a regression?
>
> ~Aaron
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Hans Wennborg via cfe-commits
> wrote:
>> It was requested that
Is PR25804 a regression?
~Aaron
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Hans Wennborg via cfe-commits
wrote:
> It was requested that this be merged to 3.8 as it fixes PR25804.
>
> Manuel: does this look OK for the branch?
>
> Thanks,
> Hans
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Samuel Benzaquen via cfe-c
It was requested that this be merged to 3.8 as it fixes PR25804.
Manuel: does this look OK for the branch?
Thanks,
Hans
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Samuel Benzaquen via cfe-commits
wrote:
> Author: sbenza
> Date: Fri Feb 5 12:29:24 2016
> New Revision: 259898
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/view
Author: sbenza
Date: Fri Feb 5 12:29:24 2016
New Revision: 259898
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=259898&view=rev
Log:
[ASTMatchers] Allow hasName() to look through inline namespaces
Summary:
Allow hasName() to look through inline namespaces.
This will fix the interaction between so
