D2)
> *Cc:* cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
> *Subject:* Re: FW: SemaAccess bug (protected members of derived)
>
>
>
> Thanks, can you please attach a diff that includes both the code change
> and the new test?
>
>
>
> On 21 March 2017 at 14:18, Dixon Ryan (ETAS/ERS-PD2) via c
From path:
URL: http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk
Relative URL: ^/cfe/trunk
From: Alex L [mailto:arpha...@gmail.com]
Sent: 21 March 2017 14:22
To: Dixon Ryan (ETAS/ERS-PD2)
Cc: cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: FW: SemaAccess bug (protected members of derived)
Thanks, can you
nt:* 21 March 2017 14:18
> *To:* 'Alex L'
> *Subject:* RE: SemaAccess bug (protected members of derived)
>
>
>
> Hello, sorry this is the first time I have done this.
>
>
>
> The test case is attached. It should fail without the patch and then
> should pass
Sending to mailing list.
From: Dixon Ryan (ETAS/ERS-PD2)
Sent: 21 March 2017 14:18
To: 'Alex L'
Subject: RE: SemaAccess bug (protected members of derived)
Hello, sorry this is the first time I have done this.
The test case is attached. It should fail without the patch and then sh
Hi,
Can you please add a suitable test-case? Clang's code-completion tests are
normally in test/CodeCompletion or test/Index.
Cheers,
Alex
On 21 March 2017 at 12:05, Dixon Ryan (ETAS/ERS-PD2) via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> There are a number of users of the clang static
There are a number of users of the clang static analyser back-end for
intelligent code completion. Irony-Mode for emacs, for example. For a while
people have been reporting an issue with not getting completions for protected
members of parent classes and I believe this patch solves the bug: simp
