Re: trivial_abi

> On Jan 8, 2018, at 10:57 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > (just a side note: perhaps this conversation would've been more suited to > cfe-dev? I sort of missed it because I only check commits once a week, unless > I'm specifically cc'd on something. All good though :)) I suppose it's more design-an

Re: trivial_abi

(just a side note: perhaps this conversation would've been more suited to cfe-dev? I sort of missed it because I only check commits once a week, unless I'm specifically cc'd on something. All good though :)) On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 4:06 PM Richard Smith via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>

Re: trivial_abi

On 3 January 2018 at 15:24, John McCall via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Jan 3, 2018, at 5:53 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > On 3 January 2018 at 14:29, John McCall via cfe-commits < > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On Jan 3, 2018, at 5:12 PM, Richard Smith wrote

Re: trivial_abi

> On Jan 3, 2018, at 5:53 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > On 3 January 2018 at 14:29, John McCall via cfe-commits > mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > >> On Jan 3, 2018, at 5:12 PM, Richard Smith > > wrote: >> >> On 2 January 2018 at 20:55, John McCall via cfe

Re: trivial_abi

On 3 January 2018 at 14:29, John McCall via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Jan 3, 2018, at 5:12 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > > On 2 January 2018 at 20:55, John McCall via cfe-commits < > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On Jan 2, 2018, at 10:43 PM, Richard Smith wro

Re: trivial_abi

> On Jan 3, 2018, at 5:12 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > > On 2 January 2018 at 20:55, John McCall via cfe-commits > mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> On Jan 2, 2018, at 10:43 PM, Richard Smith > > wrote: >> >> On 2 January 2018 at 19:02, John McCall via c

Re: trivial_abi

On 2 January 2018 at 20:55, John McCall via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Jan 2, 2018, at 10:43 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > > On 2 January 2018 at 19:02, John McCall via cfe-commits < > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On Jan 2, 2018, at 9:15 PM, Akira Hatanaka w

Re: trivial_abi

> On Jan 2, 2018, at 10:43 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > > On 2 January 2018 at 19:02, John McCall via cfe-commits > mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > >> On Jan 2, 2018, at 9:15 PM, Akira Hatanaka > > wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Jan 2, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Richar

Re: trivial_abi

On 2 January 2018 at 19:02, John McCall via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Jan 2, 2018, at 9:15 PM, Akira Hatanaka wrote: > > > > On Jan 2, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Richard Smith via cfe-commits < > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 2 January 2018 at 15:33, John McCall v

Re: trivial_abi

> On Jan 2, 2018, at 9:15 PM, Akira Hatanaka wrote: > > > >> On Jan 2, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Richard Smith via cfe-commits >> mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> On 2 January 2018 at 15:33, John McCall via cfe-commits >> mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> Hey, Richard et

Re: trivial_abi

> On Jan 2, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Richard Smith via cfe-commits > wrote: > > On 2 January 2018 at 15:33, John McCall via cfe-commits > mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > Hey, Richard et al. Akira and I were talking about the right ABI rule for > deciding can-pass-in-registers-ness for

Re: trivial_abi

On 2 January 2018 at 15:33, John McCall via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hey, Richard et al. Akira and I were talking about the right ABI rule for > deciding can-pass-in-registers-ness for structs in the presence of > trivial_abi, and I think I like Akira's approach but want