Re: r352079 - [FileManager] Revert r347205 to avoid PCH file-descriptor leak.

2019-01-28 Thread Hans Wennborg via cfe-commits
Thanks for looking into this. I've reverted the test assertions on the branch in r352354. On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 1:14 AM Sam McCall wrote: > > This is kind of expected: r347205 was a bugfix. > Reverting it causes a real bug, and the tests are failing. The bug is > acceptable for 8.0 - it affect

Re: r352079 - [FileManager] Revert r347205 to avoid PCH file-descriptor leak.

2019-01-28 Thread Sam McCall via cfe-commits
This is kind of expected: r347205 was a bugfix. Reverting it causes a real bug, and the tests are failing. The bug is acceptable for 8.0 - it affects only a marginal case (go-to-definition on a #include *outside* the preamble section of a file that was also transitively #included in the preamble).

Re: r352079 - [FileManager] Revert r347205 to avoid PCH file-descriptor leak.

2019-01-25 Thread Hans Wennborg via cfe-commits
Sorry to bring more bad news, but merging this seems to have regressed a clangd test on the branch (I didn't notice at the time, because I ran the wrong set of tests, d'oh). I've searched my inbox but couldn't find any recent commits touching the test. Do you have any idea what might be happening?

Re: r352079 - [FileManager] Revert r347205 to avoid PCH file-descriptor leak.

2019-01-25 Thread Hans Wennborg via cfe-commits
Merged to 8.0 in r352225. On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 10:55 AM Sam McCall via cfe-commits wrote: > > Author: sammccall > Date: Thu Jan 24 10:55:24 2019 > New Revision: 352079 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=352079&view=rev > Log: > [FileManager] Revert r347205 to avoid PCH file-descr