Thanks!
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:58 AM Eric Fiselier wrote:
> Fixed in r313499.
>
> /Eric
>
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Eric Fiselier wrote:
>
>> I'll correct them.
>>
>> /Eric
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Richard Smith
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This is a bug in the libc++ tests. It's
Thank you!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 17, 2017, at 1:58 PM, Eric Fiselier wrote:
>
> Fixed in r313499.
>
> /Eric
>
>> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Eric Fiselier wrote:
>> I'll correct them.
>>
>> /Eric
>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Richard Smith
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> This is
Fixed in r313499.
/Eric
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Eric Fiselier wrote:
> I'll correct them.
>
> /Eric
>
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Richard Smith
> wrote:
>
>> This is a bug in the libc++ tests. It's OK for them to check that the
>> static_assert message is produced, but not that
I'll correct them.
/Eric
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Richard Smith
wrote:
> This is a bug in the libc++ tests. It's OK for them to check that the
> static_assert message is produced, but not that they're prefixed with the
> exact string "static_assert failed:".
>
> On 16 September 2017 at
This is a bug in the libc++ tests. It's OK for them to check that the
static_assert message is produced, but not that they're prefixed with the
exact string "static_assert failed:".
On 16 September 2017 at 05:54, NAKAMURA Takumi via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> This triggere
This triggered failure in libcxx tests.
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/bootstrap-clang-libcxx-lld-i686-linux/builds/97
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 8:40 AM Douglas Gregor via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: dgregor
> Date: Thu Sep 14 16:38:42 2017
> New Revision: 313315
>
> URL:
