I'm perhaps not the only person who is wondering, so I'll update the
original thread instead of replying to this thread.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Martell Malone
wrote:
> cc @rui this is why I reverted it.
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Martell Malone
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>>
cc @rui this is why I reverted it.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Martell Malone
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I reverted this for now, I assume it has to do with the argument ordering.
> Will try a change and re apply.
>
> Many Thanks,
> Martell
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Martell Malone
Hi Mike,
I reverted this for now, I assume it has to do with the argument ordering.
Will try a change and re apply.
Many Thanks,
Martell
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Martell Malone
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I actually posted this in the phab thread a few minutes ago.
>
> ```
> Tests for this
Hi Mike,
I actually posted this in the phab thread a few minutes ago.
```
Tests for this pass locally but the build bots are complaining with
// CHECK_LLD_32: "{{[^"]*}}ld.lld{{(.exe)?}}"
^
:1:1: note: scanning from here
clang version 6.0.0 (trunk 313082)
^
:5:51: note: possible
Hi,
Would you please have a look at:
http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage1-cmake-RA-incremental/42380/
it appears this commit is causing some tests to fail on our bots. Any
assistance you may provide in getting the bots back green would be greatly
appreciated.
Respectfully,
Mike Edwar
