*Sent: *Thursday, March 24, 2016 10:39:18 AM
> *Subject: *Re: r264205 - [CUDA] Don't define __NVCC__.
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:30 AM, David Blaikie via cfe-commits <
> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> This seems like a different tradeoff from the
- Original Message -
> From: "Reid Kleckner via cfe-commits"
> To: "David Blaikie"
> Cc: "cfe-commits"
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 10:39:18 AM
> Subject: Re: r264205 - [CUDA] Don't define __NVCC__.
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:30 AM, David Blaikie via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> This seems like a different tradeoff from the one Clang made for GCC
> compatibility (we define all the GCC macros, but then also define others so
> people can detect Clang). If people were just
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Justin Lebar via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: jlebar
> Date: Wed Mar 23 17:42:27 2016
> New Revision: 264205
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=264205&view=rev
> Log:
> [CUDA] Don't define __NVCC__.
>
> Summary:
> We deci
