Test updated.
patch.diff
Description: Binary data
On 9 Jan 2017, at 3:48 PM, Akira Hatanaka wrote:Perhaps you can check more explicitly that the destructor is called inside the loop?// CHECK: [[regex for LOOP_BODY]]:// CHECK: call void @_ZN3fooC1Ev// CHECK-NOT: br// CHECK: ca
Perhaps you can check more explicitly that the destructor is called inside the
loop?
// CHECK: [[regex for LOOP_BODY]]:
// CHECK: call void @_ZN3fooC1Ev
// CHECK-NOT: br
// CHECK: call void @_ZN3barC1E3foo
// CHECK-NOT: br
// CHECK: call void @_ZN3fooD1Ev
// CHECK: br [[LOOP_BODY]]
> On Jan 8, 2