Woops. I misread the name of the test. I just committed a fix. Thanks for
the heads up.
/Eric
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Francois Pichet
wrote:
> You didn't update allocator.members\construct.pass.cpp in your patch.
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Eric Fiselier wrote:
>
>> Still?
You didn't update allocator.members\construct.pass.cpp in your patch.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Eric Fiselier wrote:
> Still?
>
> I would of hoped this patch fixed it.
>
> Could you provide the test output?
>
> /Eric
>
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 4:39 PM, Francois Pichet
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
Still?
I would of hoped this patch fixed it.
Could you provide the test output?
/Eric
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 4:39 PM, Francois Pichet
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am seeing failure on this test too.
> test\std\utilities\memory\default.allocator\allocator.member
> s\construct.pass.cpp
>
> For the s
Hi,
I am seeing failure on this test too.
test\std\utilities\memory\default.allocator\allocator.
members\construct.pass.cpp
For the same reason : new optimized away.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: ericwf
> Date: