Replies inline.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 7:59 PM Sam McCall wrote:
> Thanks - I think there's quite a lot of background missing here:
>
Indeed, here are clarifications.
> what/who is this for,
>
Building the index for clangd without actually running clangd it seems
useful, e.g. for cases when yo
Thanks - I think there's quite a lot of background missing here: what/who
is this for, why a separate binary from clangd-indexer (or and how do they
relate, how much of the BackgroundIndex code structure makes sense with
multiple users.
I assume there's been some offline discussion about this, but
