>
>
> Awesome! Does it mean that the optimization for adding less constraints
> was in fact buggy?
>
>
I pretty sure it was not related to the optimizations, I removed them days
ago (in the previous version of this patch) and the bug was still there.
>
> 2. Could it be something unrelated to your
Hi,
> Just a bit of context and to have some expectation management regarding
> this patch. The main purpose of this implementation was to back a thesis.
> It was made under a very serious time pressure and the main goal was to be
> able to measure on real world projects as soon as possible and i
