On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Nico Weber wrote:
> Consider landing the obvious bits (print function, mostly) separately and
> use this only for the interesting bits.
>
Sounds good. I just wanted to make sure I got the simple bits right as well.
If this doesn't get reviewed in the next week I'
Consider landing the obvious bits (print function, mostly) separately and
use this only for the interesting bits.
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Michał Górny via Phabricator via
cfe-commits wrote:
> mgorny added inline comments.
>
>
>
> Comment at: tools/clang-format/git-clang