Re: [PATCH] D20423: [Clang][LLVMGold] Passing LLVM arguments to gold plugin

2016-05-31 Thread Mehdi AMINI via cfe-commits
mehdi_amini added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20423#440539, @bunty2020 wrote: > Clang's help shows the following description: > **-mllvm Additional arguments to forward to LLVM's option > processing** > > If -mllvm sets some internal option for cc1 then its strange > for

Re: [PATCH] D20423: [Clang][LLVMGold] Passing LLVM arguments to gold plugin

2016-05-26 Thread Bhargav Reddy Godala via cfe-commits
bunty2020 added a comment. Clang's help shows the following description: **-mllvm Additional arguments to forward to LLVM's option processing** If -mllvm sets some internal option for cc1 then its strange for front-end parser using some option which is supposed to be LLVM's option.

Re: [PATCH] D20423: [Clang][LLVMGold] Passing LLVM arguments to gold plugin

2016-05-24 Thread Mailing List "llvm-commits" via cfe-commits
llvm-commits added a subscriber: llvm-commits. llvm-commits added a comment. This seems strange to me. For example, it breaks the otherwise very convenient: $ clang -flto t.c -mllvm -some-internal-option-for-cc1 ---