On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
> I dont think we need finer grained code owners, but I also don't have real
> objections.
Then we can leave well enough alone. :-)
~Aaron
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015, 3:31 PM Aaron Ballman wrote:
>>
>> aaron.ballman closed this revision.
>> a
I dont think we need finer grained code owners, but I also don't have real
objections.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015, 3:31 PM Aaron Ballman wrote:
> aaron.ballman closed this revision.
> aaron.ballman added a comment.
>
> Thanks! I've commit in r249130.
>
> Do we want to have code owners for this sort of
aaron.ballman closed this revision.
aaron.ballman added a comment.
Thanks! I've commit in r249130.
Do we want to have code owners for this sort of thing, or is that too
fine-grained of a concept? If we do want them, I am (obviously) happy to be the
code owner for anything in the CERT directory.
klimek added a subscriber: klimek.
klimek accepted this revision.
klimek added a reviewer: klimek.
klimek added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
lg
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13352
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@li
