Thanks! Commit in r252104.
~Aaron
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> LGTM, thanks!
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Richard Smith
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Richard Smith
>>
LGTM, thanks!
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Richard Smith
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Richard Smith
> wrote:
> >>
> >> It'd be simpler and would more directly match the C spec
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
>>
>> It'd be simpler and would more directly match the C specification (and
>> would handle a few other cases better, such as placeholder types and atomic
>> types) if you instead passed t
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> It'd be simpler and would more directly match the C specification (and
> would handle a few other cases better, such as placeholder types and atomic
> types) if you instead passed the operand through DefaultLvalueConversion
>
or rather, Defa
It'd be simpler and would more directly match the C specification (and
would handle a few other cases better, such as placeholder types and atomic
types) if you instead passed the operand through DefaultLvalueConversion
rather than matching against the decayed form of the type.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015
