Even if it still did add overhead, it seems perfectly reasonable, from a
user's perspective (namely mine), that if I introduce unnecessary narrowing
matchers to my chain that there may be a performance penalty.
The ability to do the following easily outweighs any performance issues for
me:
anyOf
One of the reasons we added the minimum was because these nodes added
overhead to the matching that was not unnecessary when they only had a
single node.
On the current implementation we could actually get rid of the node
completely for the one argument calls.
I would be ok with removing the lower
