r247603
On 7 September 2015 at 13:22, Xan López via cfe-commits
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 09:07:41AM -0700, Saleem Abdulrasool wrote:
>> > Basically check that -lc is present when clang is called in a certain
>> > way I guess? Or something more sophisticated?
>>
>>
>> Yeah, that it is pres
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 09:07:41AM -0700, Saleem Abdulrasool wrote:
> > Basically check that -lc is present when clang is called in a certain
> > way I guess? Or something more sophisticated?
>
>
> Yeah, that it is present when a DSO or executable is linked.
Right, maybe something like this. Pat
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Xan López wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:28:43PM -0700, Saleem Abdulrasool wrote:
> > > Ping?
> > >
> >
> > Testcase? Looks fine otherwise.
>
> Basically check that -lc is present when clang is called in a certain
> way I guess? Or something more sophisticate
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:28:43PM -0700, Saleem Abdulrasool wrote:
> > Ping?
> >
>
> Testcase? Looks fine otherwise.
Basically check that -lc is present when clang is called in a certain
way I guess? Or something more sophisticated?
Xan
>
>
> > > From 8e81d6b095542c0ff1e28cf1f09d675f8afe1a2
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Xan López via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 07:53:40PM +0200, Xan López via cfe-commits wrote:
> > This is actually needed, otherwise libc won't be added at all. For
> > instance when building libclang.so all the libc sym
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 07:53:40PM +0200, Xan López via cfe-commits wrote:
> This is actually needed, otherwise libc won't be added at all. For
> instance when building libclang.so all the libc symbols won't be
> found, with ld warning about libc being an "implicit dependency".
>
> ((This patch si
