I will try implementing John's suggestions. Thanks.
Sam
From: rjmcc...@apple.com [mailto:rjmcc...@apple.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2018 12:14 PM
To: Richard Smith
Cc: Liu, Yaxun (Sam) ; cfe-commits
Subject: Re: r326946 - CodeGen: Fix address space of indirect function argument
On
> On Mar 9, 2018, at 8:51 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This change increases the size of a CallArg, and thus that of a CallArgList,
> dramatically (an LValue is *much* larger than an RValue, and unlike an
> RValue, does not appear to be at all optimized for size). This results in
> Ca
Hi,
This change increases the size of a CallArg, and thus that of a
CallArgList, dramatically (an LValue is *much* larger than an RValue, and
unlike an RValue, does not appear to be at all optimized for size). This
results in CallArgList (which contains inline storage for 16 CallArgs)
ballooning i
