On 19.01.2017 23:43, Liu, Yaxun (Sam) wrote:
I think the supported extensions for a target should be as accurate as
possible, for it to be useful. Setting all
extensions to be supported on all targets will defeat its purpose.
I agree on the first part, but arrive at the exact opposite result
different targets based on that.
Sam
-Original Message-
From: Anastasia Stulova [mailto:anastasia.stul...@arm.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 12:31 PM
To: Kalle Raiskila
Cc: cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org; Liu, Yaxun (Sam) ; nd
Subject: RE: PATCH: re-enable OpenCL extensions
As me
lto:cfe-commits-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of
Kalle Raiskila via cfe-commits
Sent: 19 January 2017 08:03
To: cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Subject: PATCH: re-enable OpenCL extensions
Hi,
I noticed a change from clang 3.8 to 3.9, that it disabled all OpenCL extension
pragmas per default.
This br
Hi,
I noticed a change from clang 3.8 to 3.9, that it disabled all OpenCL extension
pragmas per default.
This broke pocl on e.g. ARM for LLVM 3.9
(https://github.com/pocl/pocl/issues/409).
Example:
$ echo "#pragma OPENCL EXTENSION cl_khr_icd: enable" > hello.cl
$ clang -emit-llvm -x cl -o tmp
