Hi Richard,
Thanks for you analysis. I have some follow up questions though:
First, either of these two suggestions below should fix the bug, though it may
be better to do both. Right ?
Then, approach (2) has a cost. It will prevent devirtualizations of calls which
could get defined elsewhere.
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Srivastava, Sunil <
sunil.srivast...@sony.com> wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>
>
> Thanks for you analysis. I have some follow up questions though:
>
>
> First, either of these two suggestions below should fix the bug, though it
> may be better to do both. Right ?
>
Eith
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Srivastava, Sunil via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I want to discuss the issue in PR27895,
>
>https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27895
>
>
>
> But I will give a slightly different example for this discussion.
>
>
>
> The
Hi,
I want to discuss the issue in PR27895,
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27895
But I will give a slightly different example for this discussion.
The issue can be demonstrated by this standalone code. Should this example link
successfully?
-
