ot;cfe-commits cfe"
>>> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 7:06:26 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Don't pass --build-id by default.
>>>
>>> > This is going to break a lot of my local rpm packaging scripts, and
>>> > I suspect the same is true for others. Th
On 2 June 2016 at 21:19, Hal Finkel via cfe-commits
wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Rafael Espíndola"
>> To: "Hal Finkel"
>> Cc: "cfe-commits cfe"
>> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 7:06:26 PM
>> Subject: Re: Don
- Original Message -
> From: "Rafael Espíndola"
> To: "Hal Finkel"
> Cc: "cfe-commits cfe"
> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 7:06:26 PM
> Subject: Re: Don't pass --build-id by default.
>
> > This is going to break a lot of my loca
On 2 June 2016 at 17:06, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
>> This is going to break a lot of my local rpm packaging scripts, and I
>> suspect the same is true for others. This is not a huge deal, but I wonder
>> if we should emulate GCC is this regard and provide some CMake option to
>> keep the current
> This is going to break a lot of my local rpm packaging scripts, and I suspect
> the same is true for others. This is not a huge deal, but I wonder if we
> should emulate GCC is this regard and provide some CMake option to keep the
> current behavior?
Yes, a cmake option is probably best.
Wha
- Original Message -
> From: "Rafael Espíndola via cfe-commits"
> To: "cfe-commits cfe"
> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 5:55:25 PM
> Subject: Don't pass --build-id by default.
>
> We do it just because gcc in some distributions do it.
I'm not a person who can sign it off, but it looks good to me.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
> We do it just because gcc in some distributions do it.
>
> I can see why --build-id is useful for distributions, but given the
> cost on day to day edit+build cycles, any dist
We do it just because gcc in some distributions do it.
I can see why --build-id is useful for distributions, but given the
cost on day to day edit+build cycles, any distro using clang should
really just pass -Wl,--build-id in rpmbuild (or corresponding tool).
Even upstream gcc is not as aggressiv
