On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Arthur O'Dwyer
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Hal Finkel wrote:
>> > On 10/21/2017 10:14 AM, Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Attributes come with multiple s
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > On 10/21/2017 10:14 AM, Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits wrote:
> >>
> >> Attributes come with multiple spelling flavors, but when it comes to
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Hal Finkel wrote:
>
> On 10/21/2017 10:14 AM, Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits wrote:
>>
>> Attributes come with multiple spelling flavors, but when it comes to
>> adding new attributes that are not present in other compiler tools
>> such as GCC or MSVC, we have done
On 10/21/2017 10:14 AM, Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits wrote:
Attributes come with multiple spelling flavors, but when it comes to
adding new attributes that are not present in other compiler tools
such as GCC or MSVC, we have done a poor job of being consistent with
which spelling flavors we ado
Very much a +1 on having attributes map in via `__attribute__` and
`[[clang::]]` uniformly when appropriate.
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Attributes come with multiple spelling flavors, but when it comes to
> adding new attr
Attributes come with multiple spelling flavors, but when it comes to
adding new attributes that are not present in other compiler tools
such as GCC or MSVC, we have done a poor job of being consistent with
which spelling flavors we adopt the attributes under. Some of our
attributes are specified wi
