Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Embedded bitcode and related upstream (Part II)

> On Jul 25, 2016, at 3:24 AM, Jonas Devlieghere wrote: > > Hi, > > I hope I'm not breaking any mailing list etiquette by replying to this > mail, but if I am then please accept my apologies. > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Steven Wu via llvm-dev > wrote: >> Hi everyone >> >> I am still

Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Embedded bitcode and related upstream (Part II)

Hi, I hope I'm not breaking any mailing list etiquette by replying to this mail, but if I am then please accept my apologies. On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Steven Wu via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi everyone > > I am still in the process of upstreaming some improvements to the embed > bitcode option.

Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Embedded bitcode and related upstream (Part II)

> On Jun 14, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:37 AM Steven Wu > wrote: > Thanks for the feedback! Replies inline. > >> On Jun 12, 2016, at 11:44 PM, Eric Christopher > > wrote: >> >> Hi Steven,

Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Embedded bitcode and related upstream (Part II)

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:09 PM Adrian Prantl wrote: > On Jun 13, 2016, at 9:37 AM, Steven Wu wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback! Replies inline. > > On Jun 12, 2016, at 11:44 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > Hi Steven, > > Great to see the commentary and updates here. I've got a few questions >

Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Embedded bitcode and related upstream (Part II)

> On Jun 13, 2016, at 9:37 AM, Steven Wu wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback! Replies inline. > >> On Jun 12, 2016, at 11:44 PM, Eric Christopher > > wrote: >> >> Hi Steven, >> >> Great to see the commentary and updates here. I've got a few questions about >> some

Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Embedded bitcode and related upstream (Part II)

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:37 AM Steven Wu wrote: > Thanks for the feedback! Replies inline. > > On Jun 12, 2016, at 11:44 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > Hi Steven, > > Great to see the commentary and updates here. I've got a few questions > about some of this work. It might be nice to see some

Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Embedded bitcode and related upstream (Part II)

Thanks for the feedback! Replies inline. > On Jun 12, 2016, at 11:44 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > Hi Steven, > > Great to see the commentary and updates here. I've got a few questions about > some of this work. It might be nice to see some separate RFCs for a couple of > things, but we'll

Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Embedded bitcode and related upstream (Part II)

Hi Steven, Great to see the commentary and updates here. I've got a few questions about some of this work. It might be nice to see some separate RFCs for a couple of things, but we'll figure that out after you send out patches probably :) What needs to be improved: > 1. Whitelist for command line