On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <
dexonsm...@apple.com> wrote:
> Thanks. Unfortunately that's one of the ways we figured it out :(.
>
> The status quo, before this commit, was an ABI difference between
> Objective-C++ (-fobjc-arc) and C++/Objective-C++ (-fno-objc-arc), wh
Thanks. Unfortunately that's one of the ways we figured it out :(.
The status quo, before this commit, was an ABI difference between Objective-C++
(-fobjc-arc) and C++/Objective-C++ (-fno-objc-arc), which is... really bad.
But rare enough I guess it took a couple of years to find.
I suspect/h
This will be ABI breaking for Objective-C++ users. I'm not objecting to
fixing the bogus configuration, but I just wanted to point it out.
/Eric
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: dexonsmith
> Date: Fri Mar 31
Author: dexonsmith
Date: Fri Mar 31 12:39:56 2017
New Revision: 299236
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=299236&view=rev
Log:
Use strong enums independently of -fobjc-arc
r145698 introduced _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_STRONG_ENUMS by copy-pasting the
__has_feature check from objc_arc_weak/_LIBCPP_H
