Re: [libcxx] r261381 - Add stdbool.h wrapper for libc++

2016-02-19 Thread Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits
> Is there any point in the #include_next, even? I think so. If stdbool.h may provide extensions/additional definitions (ex "#define _Bool"). I don't want to manage these within libc++ and I don't want to prevent users from getting them from the actual header. Although upon further inspection "_B

Re: [libcxx] r261381 - Add stdbool.h wrapper for libc++

2016-02-19 Thread Richard Smith via cfe-commits
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits wrote: > Author: ericwf > Date: Fri Feb 19 18:16:41 2016 > New Revision: 261381 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=261381&view=rev > Log: > Add stdbool.h wrapper for libc++ > > Summary: > According to the C++ standard is

[libcxx] r261381 - Add stdbool.h wrapper for libc++

2016-02-19 Thread Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits
Author: ericwf Date: Fri Feb 19 18:16:41 2016 New Revision: 261381 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=261381&view=rev Log: Add stdbool.h wrapper for libc++ Summary: According to the C++ standard isn't allowed to define `true` `false` or `bool`. However these macros are sometimes defin