frasercrmck wrote:
> > It's a shame we've got such an ugly way of "opting out" of builtins, but I
> > don't know if it's worth coming up with a nicer one.
>
> Yes, I don't think it's worth it right now.
>
> Could you please submit that PR?
Sure thing.
One thing I wondered is whether the empt
https://github.com/rjodinchr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134094
clspv uses a better implementation that is not using a bigger side when not
available.
Add a dummy implementation for mul_hi to avoid to override the implementation
of clspv with the one in libclc.
>From 46d
https://github.com/frasercrmck closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134094
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rjodinchr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134094
>From 46d4e40a3142b36811b85ac3d2ececf46d5b8e7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Romaric Jodin
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 17:12:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [libclc]: clspv: add a dummy implememtation for mul_hi
cls
rjodinchr wrote:
For the record, clspv implementation is based on OpMulExtended which is SPIR-V
specific and not accessible from C.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134094
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.
rjodinchr wrote:
@frasercrmck could you please review?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134094
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
