jpienaar wrote:
> Can you expand on the motivation? Why is it a problem that PDL is always
> included? Your description isn’t very explicit on the impact.
Done. Its not PDL specific, I think it is a problem if any dialect is always
included even if not used :) The others just have a simple met
https://github.com/jpienaar edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69927
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
joker-eph wrote:
Can you expand on the motivation? Why is it a problem that PDL is always
included? Your description isn’t very explicit on the impact.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69927
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm
https://github.com/jpienaar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69927
>From eea36708d838411d70eb99265c3a2f3aabb91460 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacques Pienaar
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:33:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [mlir] Add config for PDL
Make it so that PDL can be optional
