[clang] Ofast deprecation clarifications (PR #101005)

2024-08-02 Thread via cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote: /pull-request llvm/llvm-project#101663 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101005 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] Ofast deprecation clarifications (PR #101005)

2024-08-02 Thread Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits
AaronBallman wrote: > We could add similar clarifications to the release notes, which were > initially included in an earlier version of this patch. So same question how > we would need to approach that. In terms of updating the release notes, once the cherry-pick happens, there's an automate

[clang] Ofast deprecation clarifications (PR #101005)

2024-08-02 Thread Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman milestoned https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101005 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] Ofast deprecation clarifications (PR #101005)

2024-08-02 Thread Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits
AaronBallman wrote: We have instructions at https://www.llvm.org/docs/GitHub.html#backporting-fixes-to-the-release-branches but the basic gist of it is to add a special comment and add the PR to the correct milestone. As in: /cherry-pick 48d4d4b641702bf6db03a1bac73b7e13dea28349 https://githu

[clang] Ofast deprecation clarifications (PR #101005)

2024-08-02 Thread Sjoerd Meijer via cfe-commits
sjoerdmeijer wrote: > LGTM, let's go ahead and merge this and get it backported to 19.x, thank you! Thanks for your help with this. I am mostly unfamiliar with the release process. Do you know how we can achieve this? Do we suggest this commit to the release manager for a backport and cherry

[clang] Ofast deprecation clarifications (PR #101005)

2024-08-02 Thread Sjoerd Meijer via cfe-commits
https://github.com/sjoerdmeijer closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101005 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] Ofast deprecation clarifications (PR #101005)

2024-08-02 Thread Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request. LGTM, let's go ahead and merge this and get it backported to 19.x, thank you! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101005 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://l

[clang] Ofast deprecation clarifications (PR #101005)

2024-08-01 Thread Sjoerd Meijer via cfe-commits
sjoerdmeijer wrote: @AaronBallman, shall we merge this? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101005 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] Ofast deprecation clarifications (PR #101005)

2024-07-29 Thread James Y Knight via cfe-commits
https://github.com/jyknight approved this pull request. LGTM, thanks. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101005 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] Ofast deprecation clarifications (PR #101005)

2024-07-29 Thread Vlad Serebrennikov via cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101005 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] Ofast deprecation clarifications (PR #101005)

2024-07-29 Thread Vlad Serebrennikov via cfe-commits
@@ -429,8 +429,12 @@ Code Generation Options :option:`-Ofast` Enables all the optimizations from :option:`-O3` along with other aggressive optimizations that may violate strict compliance with -language standards. This is deprecated in favor of :option:`-O3` -i

[clang] Ofast deprecation clarifications (PR #101005)

2024-07-29 Thread Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits
@@ -429,8 +429,12 @@ Code Generation Options :option:`-Ofast` Enables all the optimizations from :option:`-O3` along with other aggressive optimizations that may violate strict compliance with -language standards. This is deprecated in favor of :option:`-O3` -i

[clang] Ofast deprecation clarifications (PR #101005)

2024-07-29 Thread Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101005 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] Ofast deprecation clarifications (PR #101005)

2024-07-29 Thread Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented: FWIW, I'm happy enough with the proposed wording (I want to give others a chance to weigh in before approving though). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101005 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits

[clang] Ofast deprecation clarifications (PR #101005)

2024-07-29 Thread Sjoerd Meijer via cfe-commits
https://github.com/sjoerdmeijer updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101005 >From 22f2e40c6d44c562e97162f04dee055a1be57460 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sjoerd Meijer Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 19:31:18 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] Ofast documentation deprecation clarifications Following u