llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-5` while building `clang,llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/17189
Here
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-3` while building `clang,llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/23/builds/8840
Here is
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast` running on `sanitizer-buildbot4` while building
`clang,llvm` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/169/builds/9864
Here is the relevant pi
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `arc-builder` running on
`arc-worker` while building `clang,llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/3/builds/13692
Here is the relevant pie
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-msan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot9` while
building `clang,llvm` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/94/builds/5667
Here is the r
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-solaris11-sparcv9`
running on `solaris11-sparcv9` while building `clang,llvm` at step 5 "ninja
check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/13/builds/6233
Here is the relevant piec
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-win`
running on `sie-win-worker` while building `clang,llvm` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/46/builds/14277
Here
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-cmake-x86_64-avx512-win` running on `avx512-intel64-win` while building
`clang,llvm` at step 6 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/81/builds/5698
Here is the releva
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-m68k-linux-cross`
running on `suse-gary-m68k-cross` while building `clang,llvm` at step 5 "ninja
check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/27/builds/7752
Here is the relevant pi
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-cmake-x86_64-avx512-linux` running on `avx512-intel64` while building
`clang,llvm` at step 7 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/133/builds/13540
Here is the releva
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-armv8-quick` running
on `linaro-clang-armv8-quick` while building `clang,llvm` at step 5 "ninja
check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/154/builds/14035
Here is the relevant p
https://github.com/djtodoro closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132907
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-quick`
running on `linaro-clang-aarch64-quick` while building `clang,llvm` at step 5
"ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/65/builds/14490
Here is the relevan
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast` running on `sie-linux-worker` while
building `clang,llvm` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/21
https://github.com/djtodoro approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132907
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+// RUN: %clang --target=mips64-linux-gnu -mcpu=i6400 -o %t -c %s 2>&1 |
FileCheck --allow-empty %s
+// CHECK-NOT: {{.*}} is not a recognized feature for this target
+
djtodoro wrote:
nit: no need for 2 newlines here
https://github.com/llvm/llvm
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+// RUN: %clang --target=mips64-linux-gnu -mcpu=i6400 -o %t -c %s 2>&1 |
FileCheck --allow-empty %s
+// CHECK-NOT: {{.*}} is not a recognized feature for this target
+
mgoudar wrote:
thank you for the review. I have removed extra line.
https://g
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Mallikarjuna Gouda (mgoudar)
Changes
PR #130587 defined same SubTargetFeature for CPUs i6400 and i6500 which
resulted into following warning when -mcpu=i6500 was used:
+i6500' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)
https://github.com/mgoudar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132907
>From 752aaecc52b78a86a36d84af4ca42d166bcdc28e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mallikarjuna Gouda
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:18:52 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [MIPS] Define SubTargetFeature for i6500 cpu
PR #13058
https://github.com/mgoudar created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132907
PR #130587 defined same SubTargetFeature for CPUs i6400 and i6500 which
resulted into following warning when -mcpu=i6500 was used:
+i6500' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)
This PR
20 matches
Mail list logo
