llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `openmp-s390x-linux`
running on `systemz-1` while building `clang,llvm` at step 6 "test-openmp".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/88/builds/3579
Here is the relevant piece of the build l
https://github.com/Lukacma closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111677
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SpencerAbson updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111677
>From f02f798702ec74d7168f5f95446a99ad2bc0e2e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marian Lukac
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 10:52:42 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [AArch64] Introduce new armv9.6 features
---
.../print-
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111677
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -6,14 +6,50 @@
// RUN: %clang -target aarch64 -mlittle-endian -march=armv9.6-a -### -c %s
2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=GENERICV96A %s
// RUN: %clang -target aarch64_be -mlittle-endian -march=armv9.6a -### -c %s
2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=GENERICV96A %s
// RUN: %clang
@@ -6,14 +6,50 @@
// RUN: %clang -target aarch64 -mlittle-endian -march=armv9.6-a -### -c %s
2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=GENERICV96A %s
// RUN: %clang -target aarch64_be -mlittle-endian -march=armv9.6a -### -c %s
2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=GENERICV96A %s
// RUN: %clang
https://github.com/SpencerAbson updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111677
>From efabe14befb5c35ae35826d79af0b64756cb3e9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marian Lukac
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 10:52:42 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [AArch64] Introduce new armv9.6 features
---
.../print-
@@ -522,6 +522,39 @@ def FeatureTLBIW : ExtensionWithMArch<"tlbiw", "TLBIW",
"FEAT_TLBIW",
// Armv9.6 Architecture Extensions
//===--===//
+def FeatureCMPBR : ExtensionWithMArch<"cmpbr", "CMPBR", "FEAT_CMPB
https://github.com/Lukacma updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111677
>From efabe14befb5c35ae35826d79af0b64756cb3e9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marian Lukac
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 10:52:42 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [AArch64] Introduce new armv9.6 features
---
.../print-suppo
Lukacma wrote:
In the end, we are going to go forward with adding Armv9.6-A to all feature
descriptions.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111677
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
@@ -1791,22 +1822,52 @@ AArch64ExtensionDependenciesBaseArchTestParams
{"sve2-bitperm", "nosve2"},
{},
{"sve2", "sve2-bitperm"}},
-{AArch64::ARMV8A, {"nosve2", "sve2-aes"}, {"sve2", "sve2-aes"}, {}},
-{AArch64::ARMV8A, {"sve2-aes", "no
@@ -1510,12 +1524,16 @@ TEST(TargetParserTest, AArch64ArchExtFeature) {
{"rdm", "nordm", "+rdm", "-rdm"},
{"sve", "nosve", "+sve", "-sve"},
{"sve-b16b16", "nosve-b16b16", "+sve-b16b16", "-sve-b16b16"},
+ {"sve-bfscale", "nosve-bfscale", "+sve-bfscale", "-
@@ -1413,6 +1424,9 @@ TEST(TargetParserTest, AArch64ExtensionFeatures) {
EXPECT_TRUE(llvm::is_contained(Features, "+tlbiw"));
EXPECT_TRUE(llvm::is_contained(Features, "+jsconv"));
EXPECT_TRUE(llvm::is_contained(Features, "+complxnum"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(llvm::is_contained(F
@@ -522,6 +522,39 @@ def FeatureTLBIW : ExtensionWithMArch<"tlbiw", "TLBIW",
"FEAT_TLBIW",
// Armv9.6 Architecture Extensions
//===--===//
+def FeatureCMPBR : ExtensionWithMArch<"cmpbr", "CMPBR", "FEAT_CMPB
@@ -522,6 +522,39 @@ def FeatureTLBIW : ExtensionWithMArch<"tlbiw", "TLBIW",
"FEAT_TLBIW",
// Armv9.6 Architecture Extensions
//===--===//
+def FeatureCMPBR : ExtensionWithMArch<"cmpbr", "CMPBR", "FEAT_CMPB
@@ -522,6 +522,39 @@ def FeatureTLBIW : ExtensionWithMArch<"tlbiw", "TLBIW",
"FEAT_TLBIW",
// Armv9.6 Architecture Extensions
//===--===//
+def FeatureCMPBR : ExtensionWithMArch<"cmpbr", "CMPBR", "FEAT_CMPB
https://github.com/Lukacma updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111677
>From efabe14befb5c35ae35826d79af0b64756cb3e9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marian Lukac
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 10:52:42 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AArch64] Introduce new armv9.6 features
---
.../print-suppo
https://github.com/jthackray deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111677
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Lukacma wrote:
@jthackray @CarolineConcatto Regarding using Armv9.6-A in feature
descriptions, I am bit on the fence here. On the hand, I think it would make it
clearer, in what architecture extension these features has been introduced, but
on other hand these features can also be used with A
@@ -833,8 +866,8 @@ def HasV9_5aOps : Architecture64<9, 5, "a", "v9.5a",
[HasV9_4aOps, FeatureCPA],
!listconcat(HasV9_4aOps.DefaultExts, [FeatureCPA, FeatureLUT,
FeatureFAMINMAX])>;
def HasV9_6aOps : Architecture64<9, 6, "a", "v9.6a",
- [HasV9_5aOps],
- !listconcat(HasV
@@ -1791,22 +1822,52 @@ AArch64ExtensionDependenciesBaseArchTestParams
{"sve2-bitperm", "nosve2"},
{},
{"sve2", "sve2-bitperm"}},
-{AArch64::ARMV8A, {"nosve2", "sve2-aes"}, {"sve2", "sve2-aes"}, {}},
-{AArch64::ARMV8A, {"sve2-aes", "no
@@ -1413,6 +1424,9 @@ TEST(TargetParserTest, AArch64ExtensionFeatures) {
EXPECT_TRUE(llvm::is_contained(Features, "+tlbiw"));
EXPECT_TRUE(llvm::is_contained(Features, "+jsconv"));
EXPECT_TRUE(llvm::is_contained(Features, "+complxnum"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(llvm::is_contained(F
@@ -1510,12 +1524,16 @@ TEST(TargetParserTest, AArch64ArchExtFeature) {
{"rdm", "nordm", "+rdm", "-rdm"},
{"sve", "nosve", "+sve", "-sve"},
{"sve-b16b16", "nosve-b16b16", "+sve-b16b16", "-sve-b16b16"},
+ {"sve-bfscale", "nosve-bfscale", "+sve-bfscale", "-
@@ -833,8 +866,8 @@ def HasV9_5aOps : Architecture64<9, 5, "a", "v9.5a",
[HasV9_4aOps, FeatureCPA],
!listconcat(HasV9_4aOps.DefaultExts, [FeatureCPA, FeatureLUT,
FeatureFAMINMAX])>;
def HasV9_6aOps : Architecture64<9, 6, "a", "v9.6a",
- [HasV9_5aOps],
- !listconcat(HasV
@@ -522,6 +522,39 @@ def FeatureTLBIW : ExtensionWithMArch<"tlbiw", "TLBIW",
"FEAT_TLBIW",
// Armv9.6 Architecture Extensions
//===--===//
+def FeatureCMPBR : ExtensionWithMArch<"cmpbr", "CMPBR", "FEAT_CMPB
@@ -522,6 +522,39 @@ def FeatureTLBIW : ExtensionWithMArch<"tlbiw", "TLBIW",
"FEAT_TLBIW",
// Armv9.6 Architecture Extensions
//===--===//
+def FeatureCMPBR : ExtensionWithMArch<"cmpbr", "CMPBR", "FEAT_CMPB
@@ -522,6 +522,39 @@ def FeatureTLBIW : ExtensionWithMArch<"tlbiw", "TLBIW",
"FEAT_TLBIW",
// Armv9.6 Architecture Extensions
//===--===//
+def FeatureCMPBR : ExtensionWithMArch<"cmpbr", "CMPBR", "FEAT_CMPB
@@ -522,6 +522,39 @@ def FeatureTLBIW : ExtensionWithMArch<"tlbiw", "TLBIW",
"FEAT_TLBIW",
// Armv9.6 Architecture Extensions
//===--===//
+def FeatureCMPBR : ExtensionWithMArch<"cmpbr", "CMPBR", "FEAT_CMPB
@@ -522,6 +522,39 @@ def FeatureTLBIW : ExtensionWithMArch<"tlbiw", "TLBIW",
"FEAT_TLBIW",
// Armv9.6 Architecture Extensions
//===--===//
+def FeatureCMPBR : ExtensionWithMArch<"cmpbr", "CMPBR", "FEAT_CMPB
@@ -522,6 +522,39 @@ def FeatureTLBIW : ExtensionWithMArch<"tlbiw", "TLBIW",
"FEAT_TLBIW",
// Armv9.6 Architecture Extensions
//===--===//
+def FeatureCMPBR : ExtensionWithMArch<"cmpbr", "CMPBR", "FEAT_CMPB
@@ -522,6 +522,39 @@ def FeatureTLBIW : ExtensionWithMArch<"tlbiw", "TLBIW",
"FEAT_TLBIW",
// Armv9.6 Architecture Extensions
//===--===//
+def FeatureCMPBR : ExtensionWithMArch<"cmpbr", "CMPBR", "FEAT_CMPB
31 matches
Mail list logo
