llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot7` while
building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/24/builds/5252
Here is the releva
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125020
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125020
>From 10af91096eda7eb2b7f07cf239f53ac3af456566 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vitaly Buka
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 19:59:21 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
=?
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125020
>From 10af91096eda7eb2b7f07cf239f53ac3af456566 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vitaly Buka
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 19:59:21 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
=?
vitalybuka wrote:
> Please add a release note so that users know about the fix and about the
> expected performance costs, but otherwise LGTM
done
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125020
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.or
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125020
>From 10af91096eda7eb2b7f07cf239f53ac3af456566 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vitaly Buka
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 19:59:21 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20initia?=
=?
AaronBallman wrote:
> The public libclang interface needs to be stable, yes... but in this context,
> that's just the interfaces declared in clang/include/clang-c/CXString.h. We
> can do whatever we want with the internal interface in
> clang/tools/libclang/CXString.h.
Oh, good catch! Agreed.
efriedma-quic wrote:
The public libclang interface needs to be stable, yes... but in this context,
that's just the interfaces declared in clang/include/clang-c/CXString.h. We can
do whatever we want with the internal interface in
clang/tools/libclang/CXString.h.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-p
https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
If `CXString createRef(StringRef)` is essentially equivalent to `CXString
createDup(StringRef)`, should we just get rid of `CXString
createRef(StringRef)`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125020
_
vitalybuka wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125020
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125020
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125020
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125020
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125020
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
14 matches
Mail list logo
