jcsxky wrote:
> I don't think this is the right approach. I stepped though the example and
> the reason we reject is because:
>
> * We substitute a dependent `AutoType` in for the types of the template
> parameters when they are initially built.
> * We call `getMoreSpecialized` determine wheth
zyn0217 wrote:
> So, I think the correct fix is to propagate dependence in
> ASTContext::getUnconstrainedType. I have a branch that implements this here.
> WDYT @erichkeane @cor3ntin @zyn0217
That looks similar to the approach which I investigated some time ago. The
difference is that I remov
https://github.com/erichkeane closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
erichkeane wrote:
> > Yeah, that seems incredibly reasonable and a much lower touch here with
> > fewer concerns about the side-effects that we got here.
>
> Should I open a PR then?
Yep, I think you should.
Sorry @jcsxky : We're going to close this one, it seems that @sdkrystian has a
'mo
sdkrystian wrote:
> Yeah, that seems incredibly reasonable and a much lower touch here with fewer
> concerns about the side-effects that we got here.
Should I open a PR then?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91842
___
cfe-commits mailing lis
erichkeane wrote:
> I don't think this is the right approach. I stepped though the example and
> the reason we reject is because:
>
> * We substitute a dependent `AutoType` in for the types of the template
> parameters when they are initially built.
>
> * We call `getMoreSpecialized`
sdkrystian wrote:
I don't think this is the right approach. I stepped though the example and the
reason we reject is because:
- We substitute a dependent `AutoType` in for the types of the template
parameters when they are initially built.
- We call `getMoreSpecialized` determine whether the pa
https://github.com/jcsxky updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91842
>From 0ebdcec675c39b26b8bee1a8b07c12fae2c58523 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: huqizhi
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 14:04:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] visit constraint of NTTP
---
clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
https://github.com/jcsxky updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91842
>From 4133001711b82c93e057e1bd05476c5d052d597f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: huqizhi
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 14:04:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] visit constraint of NTTP
---
clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -79,14 +79,14 @@ template struct Y2 {}; //
expected-note {{partial
template class U, typename... Z>
struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; };
template class U, typename... Z>
-struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; };
+struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; }; // expected-note {{partial
specialization matches [wit
https://github.com/jcsxky edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -79,14 +79,14 @@ template struct Y2 {}; //
expected-note {{partial
template class U, typename... Z>
struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; };
template class U, typename... Z>
-struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; };
+struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; }; // expected-note {{partial
specialization matches [wit
@@ -79,14 +79,14 @@ template struct Y2 {}; //
expected-note {{partial
template class U, typename... Z>
struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; };
template class U, typename... Z>
-struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; };
+struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; }; // expected-note {{partial
specialization matches [wit
@@ -79,14 +79,14 @@ template struct Y2 {}; //
expected-note {{partial
template class U, typename... Z>
struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; };
template class U, typename... Z>
-struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; };
+struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; }; // expected-note {{partial
specialization matches [wit
@@ -79,14 +79,14 @@ template struct Y2 {}; //
expected-note {{partial
template class U, typename... Z>
struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; };
template class U, typename... Z>
-struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; };
+struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; }; // expected-note {{partial
specialization matches [wit
@@ -2257,6 +2257,11 @@ void StmtProfiler::VisitSubstNonTypeTemplateParmExpr(
const SubstNonTypeTemplateParmExpr *E) {
// Profile exactly as the replacement expression.
Visit(E->getReplacement());
+ if (auto *NTTP =
+ dyn_cast_if_present(E->getParameter());
---
@@ -79,14 +79,14 @@ template struct Y2 {}; //
expected-note {{partial
template class U, typename... Z>
struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; };
template class U, typename... Z>
-struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; };
+struct Y3 { Y3()=delete; }; // expected-note {{partial
specialization matches [wit
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Qizhi Hu (jcsxky)
Changes
attempt to fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/77377
`isSameTemplateArg` returns incorrect result since clang didn't visit
constraint of NTTP. Furthermore, It makes class template partial
spe
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Qizhi Hu (jcsxky)
Changes
attempt to fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/77377
`isSameTemplateArg` returns incorrect result since clang didn't visit
constraint of NTTP. Furthermore, It makes class template partial
specializat
https://github.com/jcsxky edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jcsxky created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91842
attempt to fix
`isSameTemplateArg` returns incorrect result since clang didn't visit
constraint of NTTP. Furthermore, It makes class template partial
specialization not more specialized than the class template
21 matches
Mail list logo
