https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67939
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
shafik wrote:
I think you should also add `[ASTMatcher]` to the subject after `[Clang]` at
least that is what past PRs seem to do.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67939
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.ll
5chmidti wrote:
Added a comment to the release notes
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67939
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/5chmidti updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67939
>From d0ac0cdb0f9ccbe78ec236932ca9b9a85768ecf2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Schmidt <44101708+5chmi...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 01:34:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] fix hasAnyBa
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Changes
The BoundNodesTreeBuilder used in the BaseSpecMatcher was the original
and was reset to its original state if a match occurred.
The matcher now uses the local copy in the inner matcher.
Fixes #65421
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/
https://github.com/5chmidti created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67939
The BoundNodesTreeBuilder used in the BaseSpecMatcher was the original
and was reset to its original state if a match occurred.
The matcher now uses the local copy in the inner matcher.
Fixes #65421
>From 8a57
